Summary
The effects of the administration of a bacterial endotoxin on the course of the Junín viral infection in the mouse were studied. The results showed that maximal protection against the disease was produced when both endotoxin and the virus were given on the day of birth. If endotoxin was administered first (on the day of birth) and was followed by the virus 24 hours later, a lesser degree of protection was obtained, but with a 48-hours interval there was no protection. If the virus was administered first (on the day of birth), followed by endotoxin 1 to 8 days later, the mortality was the same as with virus alone. If the interval between the administration of the virus and the endotoxin was 9 to 10 days, a very high mortality was observed in 24 hours, possibly due to an increased sensitivity of the infected mouse to the lethal effect of endotoxin.
Viral titrations showed that the brains of endotoxin-protected mice contained enough virus to kill normal mice, indicating that the mere presence of the virus is not sufficient to produce death in the infected animals. Circulating antibodies to the virus were detectable 28 days after infection, i.e., about 13 days after the signs of the disease had disappeared. This fact and the failure of endotoxin-protected mice to survive a new challenge with Junín virus suggest that the protective phenomenon is not antibody-related.
Since endotoxin fails to protect when given to mice either simultaneously with the virus 2 days after birth or one or more days after infection on the day of birth, it is very unlikely that an enhanced release of interferon might be responsible for the observed protection.
Thymic function and its possible alteration by endotoxin is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bancroft, H.: Introduction to Biostatistics, New York: Hosber-Harper, 1957.
Denman, A. M., andE. P. Frenkel: Mode of action of antilymphocyte globulin. II. Changes in the lymphoid cell population in rats treated with anti-lymphocyte globulin. Immunology14, 114–126 (1988).
Finger, H., H. Fresenius, andM. Angerer: Bacterial endotoxins as immuno-suppressive agents. Experientia (Basel)27, 456–458 (1971).
Franzl, R. E., andP. D. McMaster: The primary immune response in mice. I. The enhancement and suppression of hemolysin production by a bacterial endotoxin. J. exp. Med.127, 1087–1107 (1968).
Frigerio, M. J., F. Kierszenbaum, andM. R. Nejamkis: Nonspecific resistance invoked by bacterial lipopolysaccharides against tuberculous infection. Int. Arch. Allergy30, 75–82 (1966).
Huang, H. Y., andM. E. Landay: Enhancement of the lethal effects of endotoxins by interferon inducers. J. Bact.100, 1110–1111 (1969).
Kierszenbaum, F., N. R. Nota, R. B. Marra, andS. C. Besuschio: Cell participation in the stimulation of immunologic response byEscherichia coli lipopoly-saccharide. Int. Arch. Allergy32, 91–97 (1967).
Landy, M., andL. Pillemer: Increased resistance to infection and accompanying alteration in properdin levels following administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J. exp. Med.104, 383–409 (1956).
Nota, N. R., M. J. Frigerio, M. R. Nejamkis, G. Carballal yL. B. de Guerrero: Acción del suero anti-timocito en la fiebre hemorrágica argentina experimental. Medicina (B. Aires)31, 298–300 (1971).
Nowotny, A.: Molecular aspects of endotoxic reactions. Bact. Rev.33, 72–98 (1969).
Parodi, A. S., S. Grinstein, andC. E. Coto:E. coli endotoxin action on guinea pigs infected with Junín virus (Argentine Hemorrhagic Fever). Rev. Latinoamer. Microbiol.8, 86–91 (1967).
Parodi, A. S., N. R. Nota, L. B. de Guerrero, M. J. Frigerio, M. Weissenbacher, andE. Rey: Inhibition of the immune response in experimental hemorrhagic fever (Jum'n virus). Acta virol.11, 120–125 (1967).
Rowley, D.: Rapidly induced changes in the level of nonspecific immunity in laboratory animals. Brit. J. exp. Path.37, 223–234 (1956).
Schmuñis, G., M. Weissenbacher, andA. S. Parodi: Tolerance to Junín virus in thymectomized mice. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.21, 200–204 (1967).
Shilo, M.: Nonspecific resistance to infections. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.13, 255–278 (1959).
Stinebring, W. R., andJ. S. Youngner: Patterns of interferon appearance in mice infected with bacteria or bacterial endotoxin. Nature (Lond.)204, 712 (1964).
Weissenbacher, M., G. Schmuñis, andA. S. Parodi: Junín virus multiplication in thymectomized mice. Effect of the thymus and immunocompetent cell grafting. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.26, 63–73 (1969).
Westphal, O., O. Lüderitz undF. Bister: Über die Extraktion von Bakterien mit Phenol-Wasser. Z. Naturforsch.7 b, 148–156 (1952).
Whitby, J. L., J. G. Michael, M. W. Woods, andM. Landy: Symposium on bacterial endotoxins. I. Possible mechanisms whereby endotoxins evoke increased nonspecific resistance to infection. Bact. Rev.25, 437–446 (1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the Comisión Nacional Coordinadora para el Estudio y Lucha contra la Fiebre Hemorrágica Argentina and by the Fundación Emilio Ocampo of Argentina.
Career investigator of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas of Argentina.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Budzko, D.B., Kierszenbaum, F. Endotoxin-induced protection against experimental Junín virus infection. Archiv f Virusforschung 41, 203–210 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01252767
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01252767