Skip to main content
Log in

Antibody response to rubella virion (V) and soluble (S) antigens in rubella infection and following vaccination with live attenuated rubella virus

  • Published:
Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The antibody response to rubella virion antigen and rubella S antigen was studied in natural rubella infection and after vaccination with live attenuated rubella virus by the complement fixation (CF), platelet aggregation (PA), and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) techniques.

In natural rubella infection CP and HI antibodies to rubella virion appeared early and rapidly reached high titers. The CP and PA antibody responses to rubella S antigen were more delayed and great individual variation was seen. Generally CF-S titers were several times lower than CF-V titers. The CF antibody response to rubella S antigen is thus different from the immune response to nucleoprotein S antigens of paramyxoviruses, supporting the concept that rubella S antigen is a subunit of virus envelope. Use of virus-free rubella S antigen preparations in routine CF test is recommended for detecting later rises of antibody titer.

After rubella vaccination a 95% seroconversion rate was recorded in both HI and CF-V tests, but the titers were lower than after natural infection. The CF-S and PA antibody responses were weaker and measurable antibodies developed in only 50% and 25% of the cases respectively.

Rubella-specific IgM antibodies could be detected in rubella infection by both sucrose gradient fractionation (followed by HI titration) and fluorescent antibody (FA) techniques. The former was a little more sensitive. In the seronegative vaccinees IgM antibodies became demonstrable in 50% of the cases between the 20th and 55th day after vaccination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmidt, N. J., E. H. Lennette, P. S. Gee, andJ. Dennis: Physical and immunologic properties of rubella antigens. J. Immunol.100, 851–857 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schmidt, N. J., andB. Styk: Immunodiffusion reactions with rubella antigens. J. Immunol.100, 210–216 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vaheri, A., andT. Vesikari: Small size rubella virus antigens and soluble immune complexes: analysis by the platelet aggregation technique. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.35, 10–24 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Myllylä, G., A. Vaheri, T. Vesikari, andK. Penttinen: Interaction between human blood platelets, viruses and antibodies. IV. Clin. exp. Immunol.4, 323–332 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lennette, E. H., N. J. Schmidt, andR. L. Magoffin: The hemagglutination inhibition test for rubella: A comparison of its sensitivity to that of neutralization, complement fixation and fluorescent antibody tests for diagnosis of infection and determination of immunity status. J. Immunol.99, 785–793 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halonen, P. E., J. M. Ryan, andJ. A. Stewart: Rubella hemagglutinin prepared with alkaline extraction of virus grown in suspension culture of BHK-21 cells. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)125, 162–167 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vaheri, A., C-H. von Bonsdorff, T. Vesikari, T. Hovi, andP. Väänänen: Purification of rubella virus particles. J. gen. Virol.5, 39–46 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Halonen, P. E., J. A. Stewart, andA. D. Hall: Rubella hemagglutinin in serum free suspension culture of BHK-21 cells. Ann. Med. exp. Fenn.45, 182–185 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Penttinen, K., andG. Myllylä: Interaction of human blood platelets, viruses and antibodies. I. Platelet aggregation test with microequipment. Ann. Med. exp. Fenn.46, 188–192 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vesikari, T., andA. Vaheri: Rubella: A method for rapid diagnosis of a recent infection by demonstration of the IgM antibodies. Brit. med. J.1, 221–223 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Linder, E., and T.Tallberg: Scandinavian Symposium on Immunology, Stockholm (1969).

  12. Salmi, A.: Gel precipitation reactions between alkaline extracted rubella antigens and human sera. Acta path. microbiol. scand.76, 271–278 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henle, G., A. Harris, andW. Henle: The reactivity of various human sera with mumps complement fixation antigens. J. exp. Med.88, 133–147 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grayzel, A. I., andC. Beck: Rubella infection of synovial cells and the resistance of cells derived from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. exp. Med.131, 367–375 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sever, J. L., D. A. Fuccillo, G. L. Gitnick, R. J. Huebner, M. R. Gilkeson, A. C. Ley, N. Tzan, andR. G. Traub: Rubella antibody determinations. Pediatrics40, 789–797 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Best, J. M., J. E. Banatvala, andD. Watson: Serum IgM and IgG responses in postnatally acquired rubella. LancetII, 65–68 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baublis, J. V., andG. C. Brown: Specific response of the immunoglobulins to rubella infection. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)128, 206–210 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen, S. M., C. P. Ducharme, C. A. Carpenter, andK. Deibel: Rubella antibody in IgG and IgM immunolgobulins detected by immunofluorescence. J. Lab. clin. Med.72, 760–766 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vesikari, T., Vaheri, A. & Leinikki, P. Antibody response to rubella virion (V) and soluble (S) antigens in rubella infection and following vaccination with live attenuated rubella virus. Archiv f Virusforschung 35, 25–37 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01249749

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01249749

Keywords

Navigation