Skip to main content
Log in

Large charmless yield inB decays and inclusiveB decay puzzles

  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent studies of inclusiveB decays, it has been suggested that eitherB mesons decay much more copiously to final states with no open charm than currently assumed, orB(D 0 → Kπ+) has to be reduced significantly. This note takes the experimentalB(D 0 → Kπ+) at its face value and estimatesB(b → no open charm) using complementary methods: one accounts for thec quark inb → c transitions, the other accounts for the c quark inb → ccs transitions. Through cancellation of errors, the average gives our best estimate ofB(b → no open charm), and the difference measures the consistency. The results of the methods are consistent with each other, strongly suggesting a much enhancedB(b → no open charm). This observation indicates that non-perturbative QCD effects are probably causing a sizable fraction of theb → ccs transitions to be seen as charmlessb → s processes, contrary to smaller traditional expectations. This mechanism has generally been overlooked and may explain the existing experimental data within the framework of the standard model. We then briefly discuss implications on baryon production governed byb → ccs processes, rare hadronicB decays and CP violation studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Altarelli and S. Petrarca, Phys. Lett.B261, 303 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. W.F. Palmer and B. Stech, Phys. Rev.D48, 4174 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. I.I. Bigi, B. Blok, M.A. Shifman and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Lett.B323; 408 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A.F. Falk, M.B. Wise, and I. Dunietz, Phys. Rev.D51, 1183 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Barish et al. (CLEO. collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1570 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Dunietz, Fermilab report, FERMILAB-PUB-96-104-T, June 1996 [hep-ph/9606247].

  7. L. Gibbons et al. (CLEO collaboration), Cornell preprint, CLNS 96-23 (1996).

  8. E. Bagan, P. Ball, V.M. Braun, P. Gosdzinsky, Nucl. Phys.B432, 3 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Bagan, P. Ball, V.M. Braun, P. Gosdzinsky, Phys. Lett.B342, 362 (1995);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. [Erratum appeared in, Phys. Lett.B374, 363 (1996)];

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Bagan, P. Ball, B. Fiol, P. Gosdzinsky, Phys. Lett.B351, 546 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Bagan, P. Ball, V.M. Braun, P. Gosdzinsky, Phys. Lett.B374, 363 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.B. Voloshin, Phys. Rev.D51, 3948 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. I. Dunietz, Phys. Rev.D52, 3048 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Buchalla, I. Dunietz, and H. Yamamoto, Phys. Lett.B364, 188 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Kwon (CLEO Collaboration), seminar presented at Moriond, March 1996.

  17. ALEPH Collaboration, Contributed paper to the 28th International Conference on HEP, Warsaw, Poland, July 1996, PA05-060.

  18. I. Dunietz, J. Incandela, R. Snider, K. Tesima, and I. Watanabe, Fermilab report, FERMILAB-PUB-96/26-T, June 1996 [hep-ph/9606327].

  19. ALEPH Collaboration, Contributed paper to the 28th International Conference on HEP, Warsaw, Poland, July 1996, PA05-062.

  20. B. Grzadkowski and W.-S. Hou, Phys. Lett.B272, 383 (1991);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. A.L. Kagan, Phys. Rev.D51, 6196 (1995);

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Roszkowski and M. Shifman, Phys. Rev.D53, 404 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. I. Dunietz, J. Incandela and F.D. Snider, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.)55A, 145 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Richman, talk presented at the 28th International Conference on HEP, Warsaw, Poland, July 1996.

  25. D. Gibaut et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev.D53; 4734 (1996); X. Fu et al. (CLEO collaboration), CLEO report, CLEO CONF 95-11.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. T.E. Browder, talk given at International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics (HEP 95), Brussels, Belgium, 27 Jul. – 2 Aug., 1995 [hep-ex/9602009]; T.E. Browder, K. Honscheid and D. Pedrini [University of Hawaii report, UH-511-848-96, to appear in the 1996 Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science].

  27. M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Lett.B385, 369 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A.F. Falk, Z. Ligeti, M. Neubert, Y. Nir, Phys. Lett.B326, 145 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Neubert and C.T. Sachrajda, CERN report, CERN-TH-96-19 [hep-ph/9603202], March 1996.

  30. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, and I. Dunietz, Phys. Rev.D54, 4419 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. W.-S. Hou, A. Soni and H. Steger, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1521 (1987);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. W.-S. Hou, Nucl. Phys.B308, 561 (1988);H. Simma, Ph.D. Thesis, Diss. ETH-9781, 1992, dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology; Zurich, 1992, and references therein;

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. H. Simma; G. Eilam and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys.B352, 367 (1991); I. Halperin and M. Lublinsky, December 1996, hep-ph/9612366.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. A.J. Buras, Nucl. Phys.B434, 606 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. S.J. Brodsky, P. Hoyer, C. Peterson, and N. Sakai, Phys. Lett.93B, 451 (1980);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. S.J. Brodsky, C. Peterson, and N. Sakai, Phys. Rev.D23, 2745 (1981); S.J. Brodsky et al., in proceedings of the Summer Study on Design and Utilization of the Superconducting Super Collider, Snowmass, Colo., 1984, edited by Rene Donaldson and Jorge G. Morfin; S.J. Brodsky, SLAG-PUB-5382, Nov 1990;

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Vogt and S.J.Z Brodsky, Nucl. Phys.B438, 261 (1995);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. , Phys. Lett.B349, 569 (1995);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. , Nucl. Phys.B478, 311 (1996);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. B.W. Harris, J. Smith, and R. Vogt, Nucl. Phys.B461, 181 (1996); M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, and L. Silvestrini, CERN-TH-97-030, March 1997 [hep-ph/9703353]; S.J. Brodsky and M. Karliner, SLAG-PUB7463, April 1997 [hep-ph/9704379].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. K. Berkelman, private communication; I.Halperin and A. Zhitnitsky, April 1997, hep-ph/9704412.

  42. P. Hasenfratz, R.R. Horgan, J. Kuti, J.M. Richard, Phys. Lett.95B, 299 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. N. Isgur and J. Paton, Phys. Rev.D31, 2910 (1985).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and Z. Ryzak, Ann. Phys.168, 344 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. S. Ono, Z. Phys.C 26, 307 (1984);

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. F.E. Close and P.R. Page, Phys. Lett.B366, 323 (1996); P.R. Page, Ph. D. Thesis submitted at the University of Oxford (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. T. Barnes, F.E. Close, and E.S. Swanson, Phys. Rev.D52, 5242 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. P.R. Page, Manchester University report, MC-TH-96-26, Nov. 1996 [hep-ph/9611375].

  49. D. Buskulic et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), CERN Report CERN-PPE/96-117, to be submitted to Phys. Lett. B.

  50. G. Alexander et al. (OPAL Collaboration), CERN Report, CERN-PPE/96-51, submitted to Z. Phys.

  51. S.J. Brodsky, G.P. Lepage and P.B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev.D 28, 228 (1983);

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. G.P. Lepage and P.B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev.D48, 2250 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. M. Luke, M.J. Savage, and M.B. Wise, Phys. Lett.B343, 329 (1995);B345, 301 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. M.M. Zoeller (CLEO collaboration), Ph. D. Thesis, submitted to the State University of New York, Albany, 1994; D. Cinabro et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Cornell report, CLEO CONF 94-8, 1994.

  55. H. Albrecht et al. (ARGUS Collaboration), Z. Phys.C62, 371 (1994); Henric Ivar Cronstrom, Ph. D. Thesis, Lund University report, RX-1372 (LUND), 1991.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. B. Behrens, a talk given atB Physics andCP Violation, Hawaii 1997.

  57. J. Smith, a talk given at 1997 Aspen Winter Conference.

  58. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, and I. Dunietz, Phys. Lett.B393, 132 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. T. Bergfeld et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Lett.B323, 219 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. R. Balest et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 2328 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. M. Artuso et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Cornell report, CLNS-95-1387, Jan. 1996.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunietz, I., Incandela, J., Snider, F.D. et al. Large charmless yield inB decays and inclusiveB decay puzzles. Eur. Phys. J. C 1, 211–219 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01245810

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01245810

Keywords

Navigation