Skip to main content
Log in

Pulsed extraction in LAMMS

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Microchimica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In laser microprobe mass spectrometry (LAMMS), the ablated ions are normally extracted using a 3-kV potential difference. This constant extraction bias continuously extracts ions as they are formed in the plasma and reduces the chance of any thermal equilibration. In contrast, in pulsed extraction a delay between ion formation and extraction should allow for partial thermal equilibration. This would reduce the energy spread of the ions entering the spectrometer and would allow more of the ablated ions to be detected, both effects giving a spectrum more representative of the original sample composition. In this paper, the energy distributions of ions from single element samples are shown experimentally to be reduced at defined delays. This arises from some extent of thermal equilibration (as predicted) and also bunching of the ions at the detector due to the transient extraction profile which causes velocity compaction. An additional result is that heavier elements require longer delays before extraction for the ions to equilibrate, because of their larger initial energy spreads. This mass-dependence of the time to reach equilibrium limits improvement in quantification of LAMMS by pulsed extraction without further modification. A LAMMS instrument designed to extract the ions initially at a low potential (to allow for equilibration) and then to apply a pulsed voltage to each bunch of ions of different mass would improve quantification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. C. Wiley, I. C. McLaren,Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1955,26, 1151.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. A. Mamyrin, V. I. Karataev, D. V. Shmikk, V. A. Zadulin,Sou. Phys.-JETP 1973,37, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. P. Poschenreider, G. H. Oetjen,J. Vac. Sci. Tech 1971,9, 212.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. B. Opsal, J. P. Rally,Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983,99, 461.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. L. Muga,Anal. Instrum. 1987,16, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. L. Marable, G. SanzoneInt. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 1974,13, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. R. Kinsel, M. V. Johnston,Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 1989,91, 157.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. J. Cotter, J. C. Tabet,Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 1983,53, 151.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Southon, M. C. Witt, A. Harris, E. R. Wallach, J. Myatt,Vacuum 1984,34, 903.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Dumville,Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge 1995.

  11. A. Vertes, P. Juhasz, M. De Wolf, R. Gijbels,Scanning Microsc. 1988,2, 1853.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. J. Matthews,Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge 1991.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dumville, J., Bate, D.J., Leake, J.A. et al. Pulsed extraction in LAMMS. Mikrochim Acta 120, 101–110 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244424

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244424

Key words

Navigation