Skip to main content
Log in

Values and potential of games with cooperation structure

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Games with cooperation structure are cooperative games with a family offeasible coalitions, that describes which coalitions can negotiate in the game. We study a model ofcooperation structure and the corresponding restricted game, in which the feasible coalitions are those belonging to apartition system. First, we study a recursive procedure for computing the Hart and Mas-Colell potential of these games and we develop the relation between the dividends of Harsanyi in the restricted game and the worths in the original game. The properties ofpartition convex geometries are used to obtain formulas for theShapley andBanzhaf values of the players in the restricted game υ in terms of the original gamev. Finally, we consider the Owen multilinear extension for the restricted game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borm P, Owen G, Tijs S (1992) The Position value for communication situations. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 5:305–320

    Google Scholar 

  2. Curiel I, Pederzoli G, Tijs S (1989) Sequencing games. European J. Oper. Res. 40:344–351

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dubey P, Shapley LS (1979) Mathematical properties of the Banzhaf power index. Math. of Oper. Res. 4:99–131

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edelman PH, Jamison RE (1985) The theory of convex geometries. Geom. Dedicata 19:247–270

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edelman PH (1997) A note on voting. To appear in Math. Social Sciences

  6. Harsanyi JC (1963) A simplified bargaining model for then-person cooperative game. International Economic Review 4:194–220

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hart S, Mas-Colell A (1988) The potential of the Shapley value. In: Roth AE (ed.) The Shapley value, Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–137

  8. Moulin H (1996) Incremental cost sharing; Characterization by strategyproofness. Mimeo, Duke University, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Myerson RB (1977) Graphs and cooperation in games. Math. of Oper. Res. 2:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myerson RB (1980) Conference structures and fair allocation rules. Intern. J. Game Theory 9:169–182

    Google Scholar 

  11. Myerson RB (1991) Game theory. Analysis of conflict. Harvard University Press

  12. Nouweland A van den, Borm P (1991) On the convexity of communication games. Intern. J. Game Theory 19:421–430

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nouweland A van den, Borm P, Tijs S (1992) Allocation rules for hypergraph communication situations. Intern. J. Game Theory 20:255–268

    Google Scholar 

  14. Owen G (1986) Values of graph-restricted games. SIAM J. Alg. Discr. Meth. 7:210–220

    Google Scholar 

  15. Owen G (1988) Multilinear extension of games. In: Roth AE (ed.) The Shapley Value, Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–151

  16. Potters J, Reijnierse H (1995) Γ-component additive games. Intern. J. Game Theory 24:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shapley LS (1953) A value forn-person games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds.) Contributions to the theory of games II, Princeton University Press, pp. 307–317

  18. Stanley RP (1986) Enumerative combinatorics I. Wadsworth, Monterey CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is grateful to Paul Edelman, Ulrich Faigle and the referees for their comments and suggestions. The proof of Theorem 1 was proposed by the associate editor's referee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bilbao, JM. Values and potential of games with cooperation structure. Int J Game Theory 27, 131–145 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01243199

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01243199

Key words

Navigation