Skip to main content
Log in

The multiplication of parvovirus Lu III in a synchronized culture system

I. Optimum conditions for virus replication

  • Published:
Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Based on the detection of viral antigen by means of immunofluorescence staining, the replication cycle of parvovirus Lu III was studied in randomly growing and synchronously multiplying HeLa cells. Two different processes could be distinguished in both culture systems. Early events consisted in the appearance of virus specific antigen 3–4 hours following infection independend on the actual physiologic state of the infected cell. The development of intranuclear fluorescence, however, started as early as 8–10 hours p.i. and proved strictly bound to cellular events. Viral replication was finished 16–18 hours p.i. when brightly staining nuclei released distinct fluorescing granules into the cytoplasm or were lost from the cell sheet.

Infection of synchronized HeLa cells at different points of the cell cycle revealed that the shortest possible synchronous replication of Lu III virus could be obtained only if infection occurred about 3 hours after beginning of S phase. Since viral adsorption, penetration, uncoating, as well as transcription of early antigen are independent on cellular physiology and take at least 3 hours, the status of “physiologic competence” necessary for successful completion of virus multiplication may be identical with events in late S phase.

Finally, experiments with UV-inactivated virus suspensions pointed to the presence of a factor which is unaffected by UV irradiation and interferes temporarely with cellular DNA synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Lami, F., N. Ledinko, andH. Toolan: Electron microscope study of human NB and SMH cells infected with the parvovirus H-1: Involvement of the nucleolus. J. gen. Virol.5, 485–492 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernhard, W., F. H. Kasten etCh. Chany: Étude cytochimique et ultrastructurale de cellules infectées par le virus K du rat et le virus H-1. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris)257, 1566–1569 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cole G. A., andN. Nathanson: Immunofluorescent studies of the replication of rat virus (HER strain) in tissue culture. Acta virol.13, 515–520 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fields, H. A., andB. L. Nicholson: The replication of Kilham rat virus (RV) in various host systems: immunofluorescent studies. Canad. J. Microbiol.18, 103–107 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hallauer, C., G. Kronauer, andG. Siegl: Parvoviruses as contaminants of permanent human cell lines. I. Virus isolations from 1960–1970. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.35, 80–90 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hallauer, C., G. Siegl, andG. Kronauer: Parvoviruses as contaminants of permanent human cell lines. III. The biologic properties of the isolated viruses. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.38, 366–382 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hampton, E. G.: H-1 virus growth in synchronized rat embryo cells. Canad. J. Microbiol.16, 266–268 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lesser, B., andT. P. Brent: Cold storage as a method for accumulating mitotic HeLa cells without impairing subsequent synchronous growth. Exp. Cell Res.62, 470–473 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Margolis, G., andL. Kilham: Rat virus, an agent with an affinity for the dividing cells. In: Slow, Latent and Temperate Virus Infections, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness Monograph No.2, pp. 361–367 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayor, H. D., andE. L. Jordan: Electron microscopic study of the rodent “Picodnavirus” X-14. Exp. molec. Path.5, 580–589 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mayor, H. D., andM. Ito: The early detection of picodnavirus X-14 by immuno-fluorescence. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.)129, 684–686 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siegl, G., C. Hallauer, A. Novak, andG. Kronauer: Parvoviruses as contaminants of permanent human cell lines. II. Physicochemical properties of the isolated viruses. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.35, 91–103 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Siegl, G., C. Hallauer, andA. Novak: Parvoviruses as contaminants of permanent human cell lines. IV. Multiplication of KBSH virus in KB cells. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.36, 351–362 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tennant, R. W., K. R. Layman, andR. E. Hand, Jr.: Effect fo cell physiological state on infection by rat virus. J. Virol.4, 872–878 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tennant, R. W., andR. E. Hand, Jr.: Requirement of cellular synthesis for Kilham rat virus replication. Virology42, 1054–1063 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tennant, R. W.: Inhibition of mitosis and macromolecular synthesis in rat embryo cells by Kilham rat virus. J. Virol.8, 402–408 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Terasima, T., andL. J. Tolmach: Growth and nucleic acid synthesis in synchronously dividing populations of HeLa cells. Exp. Cell Res.30, 344–362 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yamashita, T., Y. Moritsugu, andH. Shimojo: Suppression of cellular DNA synthesis in growing cells by ultraviolet-irradiated adenoviruses. Virology45, 687–696 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siegl, G., Gautschi, M. The multiplication of parvovirus Lu III in a synchronized culture system. Archiv f Virusforschung 40, 105–118 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242642

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242642

Keywords

Navigation