Skip to main content
Log in

Computer estimation of dissociation constants. Part IV. Precision and accuracy of potentiometric determinations

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Microchimica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The protonation constants logK Hj of the acidH J are determined by regression analysis of potentiometric titration data whencommon parameters (logK Hj,j = 1,...,J) andgroup parameters (E 0′,L 0,H T ) are refined. Two kinds of systematic error have been investigated: the error from an uncertainty of group parameters and the error from a computational strategy of the minimization algorithm used. An analysis of variance of logK Hj matrix was made for 6 reproduced titrations and 7 computational strategies of 6 various regression programs. It was concluded that the influence of the program used is negligible. From two ways of calibration of the glass electrode cell,the internal calibration (performed during titration) was slightly more accurate thanthe external calibration (done separately). Of programs tested, the ESAB and ACBA are most powerful because they permit refinement of group parameters and internal calibration. D-tartaric acid was chosen as model substance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. G. Sillén, B. Warnqvist,Arkiv Kemi 1968,31, 315.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. W. Childs, P. S. Hallman, D. D. Perrin,Talanta 1969,16, 1119.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. J. C. Rossotti, H. S. Rossotti, R. J. Whewell,J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1971,33, 2051.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. S. Rossotti,Talanta 1974,21, 809.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Gans,Coord. Chem. Rev. 1976,19, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Majer, K. Štulík,Chem. Listy 1978,72, 785.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Gaizer,Coord. Chem. Rev. 1979,27, 195.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Gans,Adv. Molec. Relax. Inter. Proc. 1980,18, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. J. Leggett,Am. Lab. 1982,January.

  10. I. Ting Po, G. H. Nancollas,Anal. Chem. 1972,44, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. de Robertis, C. De Stefano, C. Rigano, S. Sammartano,Anal. Chim. Acta 1986,191, 385.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. R. Hartley, C. Burgess, R. M. Alcock,Solution Equilibria, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. J. Leggett (ed.),Computational Methods for the Determination of Formation Constants, Plenum Press, New York, 1985: MINIQUAD and MIQUV pp. 99–157; MAGEC pp. 37–70; PSEQUAD pp. 291–354.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Meloun, J. Havel, E. Hogfeldt,Computation of Solution Equilibria. A Guide to Methods in Potentiometry, Extraction and Spectrophotometry, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Meloun, J. Havel,Computation of Solution Equilibria, 1. Spectrophotometry, 2. Potentiometry, Folia UJEP, Brno, 1984, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Rigano, M. Grasso, S. Sammartano,Ann. Chim. 1984,74, 537.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. De Stefano, P. Princi, C. Rigano, S. Sammartano,Ann. Chim. 1987,77, 643.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Arena, E. Rizzarelli, S. Sammartano, C. Rigano,Talanta 1979,26, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Gans, A. Sabatini, A. Vacca,J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1985, 1195.

  20. M. Meloun, M. Bartoš, E. Högfeldt,Talanta 1988,35, 981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Kotrlý, L. Šůcha,Handbook of Chemical Equilibria in Analytical Chemistry, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1985, p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Sabatini, A. Vacca, P. Gans,Talanta 1974,21, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. May, D. R. Williams, P. W. Linder, R. G. Torrington,Talanta 1982,29, 249.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. J. Motekaitis, A. E. Martell,Can. J. Chem. 1982,60, 168.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Braibanti, F. Dallavalli, G. Mori, B. Veroni,Talanta 1982,29, 249.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Meloun, J. Militký, M. Forina,Chemometrics in Instrumental Analysis, 1. Interactive Data Evaluation, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Meloun, J. Militký, M. Forina,Chemometrics in Instrumental Analysis, 2. Interactive Model Building and Testing, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Previous Part III.: Iraqi J. Sci.1981,22, 67.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meloun, M., Bartoš, M. Computer estimation of dissociation constants. Part IV. Precision and accuracy of potentiometric determinations. Mikrochim Acta 108, 227–239 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242432

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242432

Key words

Navigation