Abstract
The protonation constants logK Hj of the acidH J are determined by regression analysis of potentiometric titration data whencommon parameters (logK Hj,j = 1,...,J) andgroup parameters (E 0′,L 0,H T ) are refined. Two kinds of systematic error have been investigated: the error from an uncertainty of group parameters and the error from a computational strategy of the minimization algorithm used. An analysis of variance of logK Hj matrix was made for 6 reproduced titrations and 7 computational strategies of 6 various regression programs. It was concluded that the influence of the program used is negligible. From two ways of calibration of the glass electrode cell,the internal calibration (performed during titration) was slightly more accurate thanthe external calibration (done separately). Of programs tested, the ESAB and ACBA are most powerful because they permit refinement of group parameters and internal calibration. D-tartaric acid was chosen as model substance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. G. Sillén, B. Warnqvist,Arkiv Kemi 1968,31, 315.
C. W. Childs, P. S. Hallman, D. D. Perrin,Talanta 1969,16, 1119.
F. J. C. Rossotti, H. S. Rossotti, R. J. Whewell,J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1971,33, 2051.
H. S. Rossotti,Talanta 1974,21, 809.
P. Gans,Coord. Chem. Rev. 1976,19, 99.
V. Majer, K. Štulík,Chem. Listy 1978,72, 785.
F. Gaizer,Coord. Chem. Rev. 1979,27, 195.
P. Gans,Adv. Molec. Relax. Inter. Proc. 1980,18, 139.
D. J. Leggett,Am. Lab. 1982,January.
I. Ting Po, G. H. Nancollas,Anal. Chem. 1972,44, 1940.
A. de Robertis, C. De Stefano, C. Rigano, S. Sammartano,Anal. Chim. Acta 1986,191, 385.
F. R. Hartley, C. Burgess, R. M. Alcock,Solution Equilibria, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1980.
D. J. Leggett (ed.),Computational Methods for the Determination of Formation Constants, Plenum Press, New York, 1985: MINIQUAD and MIQUV pp. 99–157; MAGEC pp. 37–70; PSEQUAD pp. 291–354.
M. Meloun, J. Havel, E. Hogfeldt,Computation of Solution Equilibria. A Guide to Methods in Potentiometry, Extraction and Spectrophotometry, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1988.
M. Meloun, J. Havel,Computation of Solution Equilibria, 1. Spectrophotometry, 2. Potentiometry, Folia UJEP, Brno, 1984, 1985.
C. Rigano, M. Grasso, S. Sammartano,Ann. Chim. 1984,74, 537.
C. De Stefano, P. Princi, C. Rigano, S. Sammartano,Ann. Chim. 1987,77, 643.
G. Arena, E. Rizzarelli, S. Sammartano, C. Rigano,Talanta 1979,26, 1.
P. Gans, A. Sabatini, A. Vacca,J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1985, 1195.
M. Meloun, M. Bartoš, E. Högfeldt,Talanta 1988,35, 981.
S. Kotrlý, L. Šůcha,Handbook of Chemical Equilibria in Analytical Chemistry, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1985, p. 160.
A. Sabatini, A. Vacca, P. Gans,Talanta 1974,21, 53.
P. May, D. R. Williams, P. W. Linder, R. G. Torrington,Talanta 1982,29, 249.
R. J. Motekaitis, A. E. Martell,Can. J. Chem. 1982,60, 168.
A. Braibanti, F. Dallavalli, G. Mori, B. Veroni,Talanta 1982,29, 249.
M. Meloun, J. Militký, M. Forina,Chemometrics in Instrumental Analysis, 1. Interactive Data Evaluation, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992.
M. Meloun, J. Militký, M. Forina,Chemometrics in Instrumental Analysis, 2. Interactive Model Building and Testing, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Previous Part III.: Iraqi J. Sci.1981,22, 67.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meloun, M., Bartoš, M. Computer estimation of dissociation constants. Part IV. Precision and accuracy of potentiometric determinations. Mikrochim Acta 108, 227–239 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242432
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242432