Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 187–205 | Cite as

Conditions for sympatric speciation: A diploid model incorporating habitat fidelity and non-habitat assortative mating

  • Paul A. Johnson
  • F. C. Hoppensteadt
  • James J. Smith
  • Guy L. Bush


Three types of genes have been proposed to promote sympatric speciation: habitat preference genes, assortative mating genes and habitat-based fitness genes. Previous computer models have analysed these genes separately or in pairs. In this paper we describe a multilocus model in which genes of all three types are considered simultaneously. Our computer simulations show that speciation occurs in complete sympatry under a broad range of conditions. The process includes an initial diversification phase during which a slight amount of divergence occurs, a quasi-equilibrium phase of stasis during which little or no detectable divergence occurs and a completion phase during which divergence is dramatic and gene flow between diverging habitat morphs is rapidly eliminated. Habitat preference genes and habitat-specific fitness genes become associated when assortative mating occurs due to habitat preference, but interbreeding between individuals adapted to different habitats occurs unless habitat preference is almost error free. However, ‘nonhabitat assortative mating’, when coupled with habitat preference can eliminate this interbreeding. Even when several loci contribute to the probability of expression of non-habitat assortative mating and the contributions of individual loci are small, gene flow between diverging portions of the population can terminate within less than 1000 generations.


speciation habitat-sympatric divergence divergent selection habitat preference assortative mating linkage disequilibrium penetrance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barton, N.H. and Charlesworth, B. (1984) Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15 133–64.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, N.H., Jones, J.S. and Mallet, J. (1988) No barriers to speciation.Nature 336 13–14.Google Scholar
  3. Bush, G.L. (1969) Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genusRhagoletis.Evolution 23 237–51.Google Scholar
  4. Bush, G.L. (1975) Sympatric speciation in phytophagous parasitic insects. InEvolutionary strategies of parasitic insects (P.W. Price, ed.), pp. 187–206. Plenum, London.Google Scholar
  5. Bush, G.L. (1982) What do we really know about speciation? InPerspectives on evolution (R. Milkman, ed.), pp. 119–28. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Bush, G.L. (1992) A reaffirmation of Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of small animals. InEvolutionary patterns and processes (D. Edwards and D.R. Lees, eds), pp. 229–49. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, G.L. and Howard, D.J. (1986) Allopatric and non-allopatric speciation; assumptions and evidence. InEvolutionary processes and theory (S. Karlin and E. Nevo, eds), pp. 411–38. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, D.J., Stuessy, T.F., Haines, D.W., Cosner, M.B., Silva, O.M. and Lopez, P. (1992) Allozyme diversity within and divergence among four species of Robinsonia (Asteraceae: Senecioneae), a genus endemic to the Jan Fernandez Islands, Chile. American Journal of Botany79 962–6Google Scholar
  9. De Meeus, T., Michalakis, Y., Renaud, F. and Olivieri, I. (1993) Polymorphism in heterogeneous environments, evolution of habitat selection and sympatric speciation: soft and hard selection models.Evol. Ecol. 7 175–98.Google Scholar
  10. Dickinson, H. and Antonovics, J. (1973) Theoretical considerations of sympatric divergence.Am. Nat. 107 256–74.Google Scholar
  11. Diehl, S.R. and Bush, G.L. (1989) The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. InSpeciation and its consequences (D. Otte and J. Endler, eds), pp. 345–65. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Feder, J.L., Chilcote, C.A. and Bush, G.L. (1989) Are the apple maggot,Rhagoletis pomonella, and blueberry maggot,R. mendax, distinct species? Implications for sympatric speciation.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 51 113–23.Google Scholar
  13. Felsenstein, J. (1981) Scepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals.Evolution 35 124–38.Google Scholar
  14. Fialkowski, K.R. (1988) Lottery of sympatric speciation computer model.J. Theor. Biol. 130 379–90.Google Scholar
  15. Fialkowski, K.R. (1992) Sympatric speciation: a simulation model of imperfect assortative mating.J. Theor. Biol. 157 9–30.Google Scholar
  16. Futuyma, D. (1986)Evolutionary Biology, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MD.Google Scholar
  17. Futuyma, D. and Mayer, G.C. (1980) Non-allopatric speciation in animals.Syst. Zool. 29 254–71.Google Scholar
  18. Gibbons, R.H. (1979) A model for sympatric speciation inMegarhyssa (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): competitive speciation.Am. Nat. 114 719–41.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, P.R. (1986)Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  20. Grula, J.W. and Taylor, O.R., Jr (1979) The inheritance of pheromone production in the sulphur butterfliesColias eurytheme andC. philodice.Heredity 42 359–71.Google Scholar
  21. Haldane, J.B.S. (1930) A note on Fisher's theory of the origin of dominance.Am. Nat. 64 87–90.Google Scholar
  22. Heatwole, H. and Davis, D.M. (1965) Ecology of three species of parasitic insects of the genusMegarhyssa (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Ecology 46 140–50.Google Scholar
  23. Hutchinson, G.E. (1968) When are species necessary? InPopulation biology and evolution (R.C. Lewontin, ed.) pp. 177–86. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  24. Kondrashov, A.S. (1983a) Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. I. One character.Theor. Pop. Biol. 24 121–35.Google Scholar
  25. Kondrashov, A.S. (1983b) Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. II. Two characters.Theor. Pop. Biol. 24 121–35.Google Scholar
  26. Kondrashov, A.S. (1986) Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. III. Computer simulations.Theor. Pop. Biol. 29 1–15.Google Scholar
  27. Kondrashov, A.S. and Mina, M.V. (1986) Sympatric speciation: when is it possible?Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 27 201–23.Google Scholar
  28. Lack, D. (1947)Darwin's Finches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. Levene, H. (1953) Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available.Am. Nat. 87 331–33.Google Scholar
  30. Liberman, U. and Feldman, M.W. (1989) The reduction principle for genetic modifiers of the migration rate. InMathematical evolutionary theory (M.W. Feldman, ed.), pp. 111–44. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  31. Maynard Smith, J. (1962) Disruptive selection, polymorphism and sympatric speciation.Nature 195 60–2.Google Scholar
  32. Maynard Smith, J. (1965) Mr. J. Maynard Smith (comments).Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. London 30 22–3.Google Scholar
  33. Maynard Smith, J. (1966) Sympatric speciation.Am. Nat. 100 637–50.Google Scholar
  34. Mayr, E. (1963)Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  35. Moody, M. (1981) Polymorphism with selection and genotype-dependent migration.J. Math. Biol. 11 245–67.Google Scholar
  36. Murray, M.G. (1990) Comparative morphology and mate competition of flightless male fig wasps.Anim. Behav. 39 434–43.Google Scholar
  37. Nagylaki, T. and Moody, M. (1980) Diffusion model for genotype-dependent migration.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77 4842–6.Google Scholar
  38. Nei, M. and Li, W.H. (1973) Linkage disequilibrium in subdivided populations.Genetics 75 213–19.Google Scholar
  39. Paterson, H.E.H. (1981) The continuing search for the unknown and the unknowable: a critique of contemporary ideas on speciation.South Africa J. Sci. 77 119–33.Google Scholar
  40. Pimentel, D., Smith, G.J.C. and Soans, J.S. (1967) A population model of sympatric speciation.Am. Nat. 101 493–504.Google Scholar
  41. Rausher, M.D. (1984) The evolution of habitat preference in subdivided populations.Evolution 38 596–608.Google Scholar
  42. Rice, W.R. (1984) Disruptive selection on habitat preference and the evolution of reproductive isolation: a simulation study.Evolution 38 1251–60.Google Scholar
  43. Rice, W.R. (1987) Selection via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character.Evol. Ecol. 1 301–14.Google Scholar
  44. Rice, W.R. and Salt, G.W. (1990) The evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character under sympatric conditions: tall evidence.Evolution 44 1140–52.Google Scholar
  45. R'Kha, S., Capy, P. and David, J.R. (1991) Host-plant specialization in theDrosophila melanogaster species complex: a physiological, behavioral, and genetical analysis.Proc. Nat Acad. Sci. USA 88 1835–9.Google Scholar
  46. Roelofs, W.R., Glover, T., Tang, X., Sreng, I., Robbins, D., Eckenrode, C., Lofstedt, G., Hannon, B.S. and Bengtsson, B.O. (1987) Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84 7585–9.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenzweig, M.L. (1978) Competitive speciation.Biol.J. Linn. Soc. 10 275–89.Google Scholar
  48. Seger, J. (1985) Intraspecific resource competition as a cause of sympatric speciation. InEvolution (P.J. Greenwood, P.H. Harveyand and M. Slatkin, eds), pp. 43–53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  49. Shaw, R.G. and Platenkamp, G.A.J. (1993) Quantitative genetics of response to competitors inNemophila menziesii: a greenhouse study.Evolution 47 801–12.Google Scholar
  50. Slatkin, M. (1982) Pleiotropy and parapatric speciation.Evolution 36 263–70.Google Scholar
  51. Smouse, P.E. and Neel, J.V. (1977) Multivariate analysis of gametic disequilibrium in the Yanomama.Genetics 85 733–52.Google Scholar
  52. Soans, A.B., Pimentel, D. and Soans, J.S. (1974) Evolution of reproductive isolation in allopatric and sympatric populations.Am. Nat. 108 117–24.Google Scholar
  53. Sved, J.A. and Ma, O. (1970) The evolution of dominance. InMathematical topics in population genetics (K. Kojima, ed.), pp. 289–316. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Tauber, C.A. and Tauber, M.J. (1977) A genetic model for sympatric speciation through habitat diversification and seasonal isolation.Nature 268 702–5.Google Scholar
  55. Tauber, C.A. and Tauber, M.J. (1989) Sympatric speciation in insects: perception and perspective. InSpeciation and its consequences (D. Otte and J. Endler, eds), pp. 307–343. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  56. Taylor, O.R., Jr (1972) Random vs. non-random mating in the sulfur butterflies,Colias eurytheme andC. philodice (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).Evolution 26 344–56.Google Scholar
  57. Templeton, A.R. (1989) The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. InSpeciation and its consequences (D. Otte and J. Endler, eds), pp. 3–27. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  58. Wade, M.J., Patterson, H., Chang, N. and Johnson, N.A. (1994) Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation in flour beetles.Heredity 72 163–7.Google Scholar
  59. White, M.J.D. (1978)Modes of Speciation. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  60. Wood, T.K. and Guttman, S.I. (1983)Enchenopa binotata complex: sympatric speciation?Science 220 310–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul A. Johnson
    • 1
  • F. C. Hoppensteadt
    • 2
  • James J. Smith
    • 3
  • Guy L. Bush
    • 4
  1. 1.NSF Center for Microbial EcologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Department of Statistics and Probability and NSF Center for Microbial EcologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of Zoology and NSF Center for Microbial EcologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  4. 4.Department of Entomology, Department of Zoology and NSF Center for Microbial EcologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations