Skip to main content
Log in

Cell culture adaptation and propagation of a reovirus-like agent of calf diarrhea from a field outbreak in nebraska

  • Published:
Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The Nebraska calf diarrhea viral (NCDV) agent was successfully adapted and propagated in several cell culture systems. Criteria of propagation were: production of a cytopathic effect, specific fluorescence, interference with cytopathogenicity of another virus, infection of neonatal calves, and identification of the NCDV agent by electron microscopy (EM) or immuno-electron microscopy (I-EM). The EM and I-EM techniques proved to be valuable diagnostic aids for detecting NCDV disease in affected calves.

Morphologically, the NCDV agent resembled the reoviruses. Resistance to lipid solvents and fluorocarbon further related NCDV to this group. The NCDV agent, however, was serologically unrelated to reoviruses so a “reovirus-like” classification for this virus was suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bowne, J. G., andA. E. Ritchie: Some morphological features of bluetongue virus. Virology40, 903–911 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cell Culture Collection Committee: Registry of Animal Cell Lines. 1st ed. U.S. Dept. HEW, Public Health Service, Bethesda, Maryland, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coria, M. F.: Cell cultures of bovine embryonic skin: Growth and characterization. Amer. J. vet. Res.30, 369–375 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, I.: Reovirus type 3 infection in laboratory mice. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci.41, 651–660 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deshmukh, D. R., H. I. Sayed, andB. S. Pomeroy: Avian reoviruses. IV. Relationship to human reoviruses. Avian Dis.13, 16–22 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fernelius, A. L., L. G. Classick, andR. L. Smith: Evaluation of a soluble antigen vaccine prepared from bovine viral diarrhea-mucosal disease virusinfected cell cultures. Amer. J. vet. Res.32, 1963–1980 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fernelius, A. L., G. Lambert, andG. D. Booth: Bovine viral diarrhea virus — host cell interactions: Serotypes and their relationship to biotypes by crossneutralization. Amer. J. vet. Res.32, 229–236 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fujisaki, Y., H. Kawamusa, andD. P. Anderson: Reoviruses isolated from turkeys with bluecomb. Amer. J. vet. Res.30, 1035–1043 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. George, S., andR. A. Feldman: Reovirus antibodies in animals in India. Ind. J. med. Res.57, 2001–2006 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gutekunst, D. E., andW. A. Malmquist: Complement-fixing and neutralizing antibody response to bovine viral diarrhea and hog cholera antigens. Canad. J. comp. Med.28, 19–23 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hartley, J. W., W. P. Rowe, andR. J. Huebner: Recovery of reoviruses from wild and laboratory mice. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)108, 390–395 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hermodsson, S., andZ. Dinter: Properties of bovine virus diarrhoea virus. Nature (Lond.)194, 893–894 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jochim, M. M., A. J. Luedke, andJ. G. Bowne: The clinical and immunogenic response of sheep to oral and intradermal administrations of bluetongue virus. Amer. J. vet. Res.26, 1254–1260 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaaden, O. R., undG. Eissner: Untersuchungen zur Reo-3-Infektion der Weißen Maus. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.27, 364–378 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kasel, J. A., L. Rosen, andH. E. Evans: Infection of human volunteers with a reovirus of bovine origin. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)112, 979–981 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kono, M., R. M.Nakamura, C. A.Mebus, and M. J.Twiehaus: The results of physical and chemical treatments and some biological characteristics of the Nebraska calf diarrhea virus. Presented to the 50th Annual Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases, Chicago, IL, U.S.A., December, 1969.

  17. Lamont, P. H.: Reoviruses. J. Amer. vet. med. Ass.152, 807–813 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Malmquist, W. A., A. L. Fernelius, andD. E. Gutekunst: Interference of bovine viral diarrhea virus by hog cholera virus in swine kidney cell cultures. Amer. J. vet. Res.26, 1316–1327 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  19. McFerran, J. B., andT. Conner: A reovirus isolated from a pig. Res. vet. Sci.11, 388–390 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  20. McFerran, J. B., R. Nelson, J. M. McCracken, andJ. G. Ross: Viruses isolated from sheep. Nature (Lond.)221, 194–195 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mebus, C. A., M. Kono, N. R. Underdahl, andM. J. Twiehaus: Cell culture propagation of neonatal calf diarrhea (scours) virus. Canad. vet. J.12, 69–72 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mebus, C. A., N. R.Underdahl, M. B.Rhodes, and M. J.Twiehaus: Calf diarrhea (scours): reproduced with a virus from a field outbreak. Univ. of Nebr. agric. expt. Sta. res. Bull. 233, 1969.

  23. Mebus, C. A., N. R.Underdahl, M. B.Rhodes, and M. J.Twiehaus: Further studies on neonatal calf diarrhea virus. Proc. 73rd ann. Meeting, U.S. Anim. Hlth Ass. 97–99, 1969.

  24. Mebus, C. A., N.Underdahl, E. L.Stair, and M. J.Twiehaus: Neonatal calf diarrhea of a viral etiology. Proc. 6th int. Conf. on Cattle Dis., Phila. Pa. U.S.A. 442–446, August 1970.

  25. Miles, J. A. R., andA. C. Stenhouse: Observations on reovirus type 3 in certain culicine mosquitoes. Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg.18, 427–432 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moscovici, C., M. LaPlaca, J. Maisel, andH. Kempe: Studies of bovine enteroviruses. Amer. J. vet. Res.22, 852–863 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pirtle, E. C.: Variation in the modal chromosome number of two PK-15 porcine kidney cell lines. Amer. J. vet. Res.30, 1561–1572 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramos-Alvarez, M., andA. B. Sabin: Enteropathogenic viruses and bacteria. Role in summer diarrheal disease of infancy and early childhood. J. Amer. med. Ass.167, 147–156 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ritchie, A. E., andA. L. Fernelius: Direct immuno-electron microscopy and some morphological features of hog cholera virus. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.23, 292–298 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ritchie, A. E., andA. L. Fernelius: Characterization of bovine viral diarrhea viruses. V. Morphology of characteristic particles studied by electron microscopy. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.28, 369–389 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosen, L.: Reoviruses in animals other than man. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.101, 461–465 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosen, L.: Reoviruses. Virology Monographs No. 1, 73–107 Vienna and New York: Springer (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rosen, L., andF. R. Abinanti: Natural and experimental infection of cattle with human types of reoviruses. Amer. J. Hyg.71, 250–257 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosen, L., F. R. Abinanti, andJ. F. Hovis: Further observations on the natural infection of cattle with reoviruses. Amer. J. Hyg.77, 38–48 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rosen, L., J. F. Hovis, F. M. Mastrota, J. A. Bell, andR. J. Huebner: Observations on a newly recognized virus (Abney) of the reovirus family. Amer. J. Hyg.71, 258–265 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sabin, A. B.: The significance of viruses recovered from the intestinal tracts of healthy infants and children. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.66, 226–230 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sabin, A. B.: Reoviruses: a new group of respiratory and enteric viruses formerly classified as ECHO type 10 is described. Science130, 1387–1389 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Spendlove, R. S., R. F. Whitcomb, andD. D. Jensen: Enhancement of infectivity of a mammalian virus preparation after injection into insects. Virology34, 182–184 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stanley, N. F.: Reovirus — an ubiquitous orphan. Med. J. Aust.2, 815–818 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stanley, N. F.: Reoviruses. Brit. med. Bull.23, 150–155 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Streissle, G., andK. Maramorosch: Reovirus and wound tumor virus: serological cross reaction. Science140, 996–997 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wagner, S.: Isolierung eines „Orphan“ — Enterovirus der Maus. Arch. exp. Vet.-Med.17, 563–594 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Western Hemisphere Committee on Animal Virus Characterization: Animal reference virus recommendations. Amer. J. vet. Res.31, 1915–1928 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  44. White, R. G., C. A. Mebus, andM. J. Twiehaus: Incidence of herds infected with a neonatal calf diarrhea virus (NCDV). Vet. Med. small Anim. Clin.65, 487–490 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published with the approval of the Director as paper No. 3167, Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Project No. 14-1. This investigation was done in cooperation with the US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Agreement No. 12-14-100-10, 610 (45).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernelius, A.L., Ritchie, A.E., Classick, L.G. et al. Cell culture adaptation and propagation of a reovirus-like agent of calf diarrhea from a field outbreak in nebraska. Archiv f Virusforschung 37, 114–130 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241157

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241157

Keywords

Navigation