Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 161–170 | Cite as

Task-specific distribution of the two worker castes in extranidal activities inMacrotermes bellicosus (Smeathman): Observation of behaviour during food acquisition

  • J. -A. Lys
  • R. H. Leuthold
Research Articles


Caste-specific division of labour can be observed in extranidal activities inMacrotermes bellicosus. Food is acquired through a sequence of tasks shared between the two worker castes. During the exploration phase, a network of subterranean galleries is built outwards from the nest, almost exclusively by minor workers. The frequency of excursions made by major workers during this building period is low, but increases significantly when food is needed by the colony. After a food-source has been discovered, it is hardly exploited by the minor workers and no recruitment occurs. They continue to construct galleries, while individuals which have contact with the food show local fidelity in their building activities within the gallery nearest to the food. After a single sporadic major worker accidentally comes across a food-source, the ratio of major to minor workers continually increases. New major workers aim for the food, bite off pieces and may transfer them to the minor workers. In general, only major workers are recruited after food has been discovered, and they then orientate towards the food-source more distinctly than the minor workers.

Key words

Isoptera Macrotermes polyethism foraging behaviour 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Badertscher, S., C. Gerber and R. H. Leuthold, 1983. Polyethism in food supply and processing in termite colonies ofMacrotermes subhyalinus (Isoptera).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12:115–119.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, N. M., 1977.The population ecology and energetics of Macrotermes bellicosus (Smeathman, Isoptera). Unpublished thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  3. Collins, N. M., 1981a. Populations, age-structure and survivorship of colonies ofMacrotermes bellicosus (Isoptera; Macrotermitinae).J. Anim. Ecol. 50:293–311.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, N. M., 1981b. The role of termites in the decomposition of wood and leaf litter in the southern savanna of Nigeria.Oecologia 51:389–399.Google Scholar
  5. Darlington, J. P. E. C., 1984. A method for sampling the population of large termite nests.Ann. Appl. Biol. 104:427–436.Google Scholar
  6. Garnier-Sillam, E., 1983. Le polyéthisme chezReticulitermes santonensis.Ins. Soc. 30:27–44.Google Scholar
  7. Gerber, C., 1986.Bedeutung der Termite Macrotermes bellicosus (Smeathman) beim Abbau von totem pflanzlichem Material in Kokosplantagen: Einfluss auf das Ökosystem und kolonieinterne Organisation. Unpublished thesis, University of Berne.Google Scholar
  8. Gerber, C., S. Badertscher and R. H. Leuthold, 1988. Polyethism inMacrotermes bellicosus.Ins. Soc. 35:226–240.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, S. C., J. P. Lafage and R. W. Howard, 1988. Isopteran sex ratios: phylogenetic trends.Sociobiology 14:89–156.Google Scholar
  10. Lepage, M. G., 1977. Foraging and food consumption ofMacrotermes subhyalinus.Proc. Int. Congr. IUSSI 8:249–252.Google Scholar
  11. Lepage, M. G., 1981. L'impact des populations récoltantes deMacrotermes michaelseni (Sjöstedt) dans un écosystème semi-aride (Kajiado, Kenya). I. L'activité de récolte et son déterminisme.Ins. Soc. 28:297–308.Google Scholar
  12. Lepage, M. G., 1983. Foraging ofMacrotermes spp. (Isoptera; Macrotermitinae) in the tropics.Soc. Ins. Trop. 2:205–218.Google Scholar
  13. Lys, J. A. and R. H. Leuthold, 1991. Morphology of the gallery system around the nest and gallery development under experimental conditions in the termiteMacrotermes bellicosus (Smeathman).Ins. Soc. 38:63–76.Google Scholar
  14. McMahan, E., 1970. Polyethism in workers ofNasutitermes costalis.Ins. Soc. 7:113–120.Google Scholar
  15. McMahan, E., 1977. Mound repair and foraging polyethism in workers ofNasutitermes exitosus.Ins. Soc. 24:225–232.Google Scholar
  16. McMahan, E., 1979. Temporal polyethism in termites.Sociobiology 4:153–168.Google Scholar
  17. McMahan, E. and J. A. L. Watson, 1977. The effect of separation by “papering” on caste ratios inNasutitermes exitosus.J. Austr. Ent. Soc. 16:455–457.Google Scholar
  18. Noirot, C., 1969. Formation of castes in higher termites. In:Biology of Termites vol. I (Krishna and Weesner, Eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 311–350.Google Scholar
  19. Oster, G. F. and E. O. Wilson, 1978.Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 352.Google Scholar
  20. Pasteels, J. M., 1965. Polyéthisme chez les ouvriers deNasutitermes lujae lors de l'établissement d'une piste de récolte.J. Biol. Gabon 1:191–205.Google Scholar
  21. Schedel, A. and M. Kaib, 1987. Polyethism during foraging inSchedorhinotermes lamanianus in unprotected areas: The role of exocrine glands. In:Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects (Eder and Rembold, Eds.), Peperny, Munich, p. 416.Google Scholar
  22. Traniello, J. F. A. and C. Busher, 1985. Chemical regulation of polyethism during foraging in the neotropical termiteNasutitermes costalis.J. Chem. Ecol. 11:319–322.Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, E. O., 1971.The Insect Societies. The Belknap Press, Cambridge, USA, pp. 548.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. -A. Lys
    • 1
  • R. H. Leuthold
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of NeurobiologyUniversity of BerneBerneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations