Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 73–78 | Cite as

Crossfostered drones ofApis cerana (Fabricius, 1793) andApis koschevnikovi (Buttel-Reepen, 1906) fly at their species specific mating times

  • G. Koeniger
  • N. Koeniger
  • S. Tingek
Research Articles

Summary

Reciprocal transfer of sealed drone brood between colonies ofApis cerana andApis koschevnikovi was successful and resulted in four colonies (two of each species) with a mixed drone population. Flights ofApis cerana drones occurred between 14.00 and 16.15 regardless whether they were in a conspecific or alien colony.Apis koschevnikovi drones also flew at their species specific time from 16.45 to 18.30. A variance estimation revealed that 99.4% of the total variance depended on the species of the drone. In contrast to theApis drone's general biological dependence upon the colony, crossfostered drones ofApis cerana andApis koschevnikovi showed an unexpected autonomy in chosing their mating flight time.

Key words

Reproduction drone social synchronisation Apis cerana Apis koschevnikovi 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Koeniger, G., Wissel, M. and W. Herth, 1990. Cornual secretion on the endophallus of the honeybee drone (Apis mellifera L.).Apidologie 21:185–191.Google Scholar
  2. Koeniger, N. and G. Koeniger, 1991. An evolutionary approach to mating behaviour and drone copulatory organs inApis.Apidologie 22:581–590.Google Scholar
  3. Koeniger, N., G. Koeniger, S. Tingek, M. Mardan and T. E. Rinderer, 1988. Reproductive isolation by different time of drone flight betweenApis cerana (Fabricius, 1793) andApis vechti (Maa, 1953).Apidologie 19:103–106.Google Scholar
  4. Koeniger, N. and H. N. P. Wijayagunasekera, 1976. Time of drone flight in the three Asiatic honeybee species (Apis cerana, Apis florea, Apis dorsata).J. Apic. Res. 15:67–71.Google Scholar
  5. Medugorac, I. and M. Lindauer, 1967. Das Zeitgedächtnis der Bienen unter dem Einfluß von Narkose und von sozialen Zeitgebern.Z. vergl. Physiol. 55:450–474.Google Scholar
  6. Punchihewa, R. W. K., 1992. Mating behaviour ofApis cerana indica in Sri Lanka. Dissertation Fb. Biologie, J. W. Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt a. M., Germany.Google Scholar
  7. Rowell, G. A., O. R. Tailor Jr and S. Locke, 1986. Variation in drone mating times among commercial honeybee stocks.Apidologie 17:137–158.Google Scholar
  8. Ruttner, F., 1988.Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 284.Google Scholar
  9. Ruttner, F., D. Kauhausen and N. Koeniger, 1989. Position of the red honey bee,Apis koschevnikovi (Buttel-Reepen, 1906), within the genusApis.Apidologie 20:395–404.Google Scholar
  10. Sakagami, S. F., 1959. Some interspecific relations between Japanese and European honeybees.J. Anim. Ecol. 28:51–68.Google Scholar
  11. Shearer, D. A., R. Boch, R. A. Morse and F. M. Laigo, 1970. Occurrence of 9-oxodec-trans-2-enoic acid in queens ofApis dorsata, Apis cerana andApis mellifera.J. Insect. Physiol. 16:1437–1441.Google Scholar
  12. Taber, S., 1964. Factors influencing the circadian flight rhythm of drone honey bees.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 57:769–775.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Koeniger
    • 1
  • N. Koeniger
    • 1
  • S. Tingek
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Bienenkunde (Polytechnische Gesellschaft)Fachbereich Biologie der J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt a. M.Oberursel 1Germany
  2. 2.Agricultural Research StationTenom, SabahMalaysia

Personalised recommendations