Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of a drag-reducing polymer solution ejection on tip vortex cavitation

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments regarding the modification of the foil geometry and/or active or passive mass injection in the vortex core have been performed to investigate the possibility of inhibiting tip vortex cavitation. The ejection at very low flow rates of drag-reducing polymer solutions at the tip of hydrofoils and propeller blades has demonstrated effectiveness as a tip vortex cavitation inhibitor. This paper reports the results obtained with an elliptical hydrofoil, of 8cm maximum chord and 12cm haif-span, operating at Reynolds numbers, of =106, much larger than those previously reported in the literature. Lift coefficients and critical cavitation numbers were determined for a variety of flow and polymer solution ejection conditions. Tangential and axial components of the mean velocity as well as velocity fluctuations along the vortex path were also measured. At 12.5 m/s free stream velocity and a variety of angles of attack, the ejection of a 500 ppm aqueous solution of a drag-reducing polymer at a flow rate of about 5 cm3/s leads to a decrease of up to 30% in the cavitation number. This occurs without modification of the lift coefficient and, hence, of the midspan bound circulation of the foil. Moreover, water injection does not cause any appreciable change in the cavitation numbers. The tangential velocity profiles along the vortex path during polymer ejection indicate that the potential region remains the same, while the viscous core dimension increases, and the maximum tangential velocity decreases substantially as compared to the no ejection or water ejection experiments. Thus, the pressure coefficients at the vortex axis are smaller than for the no ejection or water ejection cases and cause the reduction of the critical cavitation numbers. It is speculated that this inhibition effect is due only to swelling of the polymer solution when exiting the ejection orifice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

core radius (distance to the vortex axis for maximum tangential velocity)

C 1 :

lift coefficient

c max :

maximum chord

Cp :

pressure coefficient at the vortex axis

Cp min :

minimum pressure coefficient at the vortex axis

d e :

diameter of the ejection port

m :

ejection flow rate

P :

reference pressure

P v :

vapor pressure

V :

free stream velocity

V a :

axial velocity

V t :

tangential velocity

v r :

radial component of the velocity resulting from jet swelling

x :

downstream distance from the tip of the foil

y, r :

distance to the vortex axis

α :

angle of attack

Δr :

difference between the swollen jet and the ejection port radii

δ :

boundary layer thickness

Γ:

tip vortex intensity

σ d (σ de ):

desinent cavitation number (with ejection)

σ i (σ ie ):

inception cavitation number (with ejection)

σ ii :

normal stresses

μ :

viscosity

v :

kinematic viscosity

p :

specific mass

References

  1. McCormick BW (1962) On cavitation produced by a vortex trailing from a lifting surface. J Basic Eng 84:369–379

    Google Scholar 

  2. Souders WG, Platzer GP (1981) Tip vortex cavitation characteristics and delay on a three-dimensional hydrofoil. DTNSRDC Report 81/007, David Taylor Res. Center, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stinebring DR, Farrell KJ, Billet ML (1991) The structure of a three-dimensional tip vortex at high Reynolds numbers. J Fluids Eng 113:496–503

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoerner SF (1965) Fluid-dynamic drag. Hoerner, New York, pp 5–12

    Google Scholar 

  5. Platzer GP, Souders WG (1981) Tip vortex cavitation characteristics and delay on a three-dimensional hydrofoil. 19th ATTC Meeting, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, pp 989–1022

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aflalo SS (1987) Inhibition de la cavitation de tourbillon marginal. Thesis, University of Paris VI

  7. Green SI, Acosta AJ, Akbar R (1988) The influence of tip geometry on trailing vortex roll-up and cavitation. Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, FED vol 64. ASME, New York, pp 76–80

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fruman DH, Aflalo SS (1989) Tip vortex cavitation inhibition by drag-reducing polymer solution. J Fluid Eng 111:211–216

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chahine GL, Frederick GF, Bateman RD (1993) Propeller tip vortex suppression using selective polymer ejection. J Fluid Eng 115:497–503

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fruman DH, Dugué C, Cerrutti P (1991) Tip vortex roll-up and cavitation. Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, FED vol 109. ASME, New York, pp 43–48

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fruman DH, Dugué C, Pauchet A, Cerrutti P, Briançon-Marjollet L (1992) Tip vortex roll-up and cavitation. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, National Academy, Washington, D.C., pp 633–651

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maines BH, Arndt REA (1993) Bubble dynamics of cavitation inception in a wing tip vortex. Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, FED vol 153. ASME, New York, pp 93–97

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arndt REA, Maines BH (1994) Further studies of tip vortex cavitation. In: Kato H (ed) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Cavitation. The Research Council of Japan, Tokyo, pp 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fruman DH, Cerrutti P, Pichon T, Dupont P (1993) Effect of hydrofoil planform on tip vortex roll-up and cavitation. International Symposium on Cavitation Inception, FED vol 177. ASME, New York, pp 113–124 and (1995) J Fluids Eng 117:162–169

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fruman DH (1984) Tip vortex cavitation inhibition by polymer additives. Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, FED vol 9. ASME, New York, pp 73–76

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fruman DH, Perrot P, Boughechal J (1984) On the swelling of submerged jets of dilute and semi-dilute polymer solutions. Chem Eng Commun 27:101–118

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ouibrahim A, Galivel P, Barigah M, Fruman DH (1980) Anomalous jet effects during thin-slit drag-reducing polymer solutions. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Flow Visualization. Hemisphere, Washington, pp 567–571

  18. Pauchet A, Briançon-Marjollet L, Fruman DH (1993) Recent results on the effect of cross section on hydrofoil tip vortex cavitation occurrence at high Reynolds numbers. Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, FED vol 153. ASME, New York, pp 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schlichting H (1979) Boundary layer theory. 6th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 598–599

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fruman DH, Castro F, Pauchet A, Pichon T (1994) On tip vortex turbulence, wandering and cavitation occurrence. In: Kato H (ed) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Cavitation. The Research Council of Japan, Tokyo, pp 151–157

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fruman DH, Galivel P (1980) Near-field viscoelastic effects during thin-slit drag-reducing polymer ejection. J Rheol 24: 627–646

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chahine GL, Fruman DH (1979) Dilute polymer solution effects on bubble growth and colapse. Phys Fluid 22:1406–1407

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Fruman, D.H., Pichon, T. & Cerrutti, P. Effect of a drag-reducing polymer solution ejection on tip vortex cavitation. J Mar Sci Technol 1, 13–23 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240009

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240009

Keywords

Navigation