Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective study of echographic endometrial characteristics and pregnancy rates during hormonal replacement cycles

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.


  1. Gonen Y, Casper R: Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1990;7:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  2. Welker BG, Gembruch V, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S, Krebs D: Transvaginal sonography of the endometrium during ovum pick-up in stimulated cycles for in vitro fertilization. J Ultrasound Med 1989;8:549–553

    Google Scholar 

  3. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams M, Garrisi GJ, Guzman I, Sandler B, Fox J, Schreiner-Engel P, Hofmann GE, Grunfeld L: An insight into early reproductive processes through the in vivo model of ovum donation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;72:408–414

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li Tin-Chiu, Nuttall L, Klentzeris L, Cooke ID: How well does ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness predict the results of histological dating? Hum Reprod 1992;7:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grunfeld L, Walker B, Bergh PA, Sandler B, Hofmann G, Navot D: High-resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium: A noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:200

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grunfeld L, Walker B, Bergh P, Guzman I, Albano C, Navot D: Endometrial thickness and echogenic pattern varies between natural and estrogen supplemented cycles. 48th Annual Meeting of the American Fertility Society, New Orleans, Nov 2–5, 1992, p 130

  7. Balmaceda JP, Gastaldi C, Remohi J, Borrero C, Ord T, Asch RH: Tubal embryo transfer as a treatment for infertility due to male factor. Fertil Steril 1988;50:476–479

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cassidenti DL, Miles RA, Vijod A, Press M, Paulson RJ, Sauer MV: Comparing responses to varying hormone replacement regimens prior to embryo donation: A histologic, serologic and receptor analysis. 39th Annual Meeting, Society for Gynecologic Investigation, San Antonio, Apr 1992, Abstr 172

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bridges E, Hughes GRV, Khamashta MA, Greenstein BD: Concomitant disappearance of rat neocortical cytosolic oestrogen receptors and apparent loss of oestrogen receptor affinity with rise in free fraction of serum oestradiol. 183rd Meeting of the Society for Endocrinology, London, Nov 25–27, 1992

  10. Steer CV, Campell S, Pampiglione JS, Kingsland CR, Mason BA, Collins WP: Transvaginal colour flow imaging of the uterine arteries during the ovarian and menstrual cycles. Hum Reprod 1990;5:391–395

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waite LR, Ford SP, Young DF, Conley AJ: Use of ultrasonic Doppler waveforms to estimate changes in uterine artery blood flow and vessel compliance. J Anim Sci 1990;68:2450–2458

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alam, V., Bernardini, L., Gonzales, J. et al. A prospective study of echographic endometrial characteristics and pregnancy rates during hormonal replacement cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 10, 215–219 (1993).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: