Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

We define a self-similar set as the (unique) invariant set of an iterated function system of certain contracting affine functions. A topology on them is obtained (essentially) by inducing theC 1-topology of the function space. We prove that the measure function is upper semi-continuous and give examples of discontinuities. We also show that the dimension is not upper semicontinuous. We exhibit a class of examples of self-similar sets of positive measure containing an open set. IfC 1 andC 2 are two self-similar setsC 1 andC 2 such that the sum of their dimensionsd(C 1)+d(C 2) is greater than one, it is known that the measure of the intersection setC 2C 1 has positive measure for almost all self-similar sets. We prove that there are open sets of self-similar sets such thatC 2C 1 has arbitrarily small measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. J. Falconer,The Geometry of Fractal Sets, Cambridge University Press, 1985.

  2. M. J. Feigenbaum,Presentation Functions, Fixed Points, and a theory of Scaling Functions, J. Stat. Phys. Vol. 52, No 3-4, 527–569, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Hacon, N. C. Saldanha, J. J. P. Veerman,Some Remarks on Self-Affine Tilings, J. Exp. Math. Vol. 3, No. 4, 317–327, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. E. Hutchinson,Fractals and Self-Similarity, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 30, No 5, 713–747, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Kenyon,Self-Similar Tilings, Ph. D. Thesis, Princeton University, 1990.

  6. A. N. Kolmogorov, S. V. Fomin,Introductory Real Analysis, Dover, 1970.

  7. J. Lagarias, Y. Wang,Tiling the Line with One Tile, Preprint, Georgia, 1994.

  8. G. Moreira, Talk at the Conference of Dynamical Systems, held in Montevideo, april 1995.

  9. A. Manning, H. McCluskey,Hausdorff Dimension for Horseshoes, Erg. Th. and Dyn. Sys. 3, 251–261, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. M. Marstrand,Some Fundamental Properties of Plane Sets, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 4, 257–302, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. M. Odlyzko,Non-Negative Digit Sets in Positional Number Systems, Proc. London Math. Soc., 3rd series, 37, 213–229, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Palis, Talk at the Conference of Dynamical Systems, held in Montevideo, april 1995.

  13. J. Palis, F. Takens,Hyperbolicity and the Creation of Homoclinic Orbits, Ann. of Math. 82, 337–374, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Palis, F. Takens,Hyperbolicity and Sensitive Chaotic Dynamics at Homoclinic Bifurcations, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

  15. J. Palis, J. C. Yoccoz,Homoclinic Tangencies for Hyperbolic Sets of large Hausdorff Dimensions, To appear.

  16. A. Sannami,An Example of a Regular Cantor Set whose Difference is a Cantor Set with Positive Measure, Hokkaido Math. J. vol. 21, 7–24, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. SullivanDifferential Structures on Fractal like Sets determined by Intrinsic Scaling Functions on Dual Cantor Sets, Nonlinear Evolution and Chaotic Phenomena, pg 101–110, NATO ASI series, Plenum, 1988.

  18. F. Takens,Limit Capacity and Hausdorff Dimension of Dynamically Defined Sets, Lecture Notes in Math. 1331, 197–211, 211.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Veerman, J.J.P. Intersecting self-similar Cantor sets. Bol. Soc. Bras. Mat 26, 167–181 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236992

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236992

Keywords

Navigation