Skip to main content
Log in

Combined use of atomic spectrometric methods in the analysis of rocks

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Microchimica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standard reference materials of limestone, granite and argillite were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XFS), flame and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (F-AAS and G-AAS), and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). The major elements Al, Ca, Fe, Si and Ti were determined by XFS and ICP-AES. The relative standard deviations (RSD) of the concentrations of the corresponding oxides obtained by XFS and ICP-AES were (1.36±0.51)% (n=18) and (1.30±0.70)% (n=17), respectively, on the average. The relative deviations (RD) from the certified values were (1.29±3.01)% (n=18) and (−0.69±5.48)% (n=14), respectively, on the average. The numbers in parentheses are the numbers of the single RSD- and RD-values used for the calculation of the averages and the relative standard deviations. Some minor and trace elements of the standard reference materials were determined by G-AAS and ICP-AES. The precision (RSD) was markedly better in the case of ICP-AES. On the other hand, the accuracy (RD) of both methods was about the same (7%). Apparently, the precision and the accuracy are primarily determined by the measuring technique and the sample pretreatment procedure, respectively. The analytical power of the combined use of atomic spectrometric methods is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. P. Fabbi, Geology, in:X-Ray Spectrometry, 1st Ed. (H. K. Herglotz, L. S. Birks, eds.), Dekker, New York, 1978, p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Magyar,Guide-Lines to Planning Atomic Spectrometric Analysis, Akadémia Kiadò, Budapest, and Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982, p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Magyar,CRC Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1987,17, 145.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Thompson, S. J. Wood, Atomic Absorption Methods in Applied Geochemistry, in:Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (J. E. Cantle, ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982, p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. W. J. M. Boumans, Line Selection and Spectral Interferences, in:Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopy, Part I: Methodology, Instrumentation and Performance, Wiley, New York, 1987, p. 392.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Atomic Absorption Methods Manual, Vol. 1 (1978) andVol. 2 (1976) (R. F. Laza, ed.), Instrumentation Laboratory, Wilmington, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Nygaard,Methods Manual, Inductively Coupled Plasma, Allied Analytical Systems, Andover, USA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Magyar, P. Lienemann, H. Vonmont,Spectrochim. Acta 1986,41B, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Magyar, B. Wampfler, J. Zihlmann,GIT Fachz. Lab. 1984,28, 301.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. A. Brownlee,Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and Engineering, Wiley, New York, Chapt. 11.

  11. J. C. Miller, J. N. Miller,Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1984, Chapt. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nomenclature, Symbols, and Units and Their Usage in Spectrochemical Analysis-II: Data Interpretation,Pure Appl. Chem. 1976,45, 99;Spectrochim. Acta 1978,33B, 241.

  13. B. Magyar, F. Aeschbach, H. Vonmont,Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem. 1978,291, 193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magyar, B., Takacs, K. Combined use of atomic spectrometric methods in the analysis of rocks. Mikrochim Acta 96, 183–195 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236103

Key words

Navigation