Skip to main content
Log in

Insurance market games: Scale effects and public policy

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a game-theoretic model to study various effects of scale in an insurance market. After reviewing a simple static model of insurer solvency (in which all customers have inelastic demand), we present a one-period game in which both the buyers and sellers of insurance make strategic bids to determine market price and quantity. For the case in which both buyers and sellers are characterized by constant absolute risk aversion, we show that a unique market equilibrium exists under certain conditions. For the special case of risk-neutral insurers, we then consider how both the price and quantity of insurance, as well as other quantities of interest to public-policy decision makers, are affected by the number of insurance firms, the number of customers, and the total amount of capital provided by investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appel, D., Worrall, J. D., and Butler, R. J. (1985): “Survivorship and the Size Distribution of the Property-Liability Insurance Industry.”Journal of Risk and Insurance 52: 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baton, B., and Lemaire, J. (1981a): “The Core of a Reinsurance Market.”Astin Bulletin 12: 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1981b): “The Bargaining Set of a Reinsurance Market.”Astin Bulletin 12: 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch, K. (1962a): “Equilibrium in a Reinsurance Market.”Econometrica 30: 424–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1962b): “Application of Game Theory to Some Problems in Automobile Insurance.”Astin Bulletin 2: 208–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, P. L. (1983): “On the Misuse of the Central Limit Theorem in Some Risk Calculations.”Journal of Risk and Insurance 50: 727–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. D., and VanDerhei, J. (1979): “A Note on the Relative Efficiency of Property-Liability Insurance Distribution Systems.”Bell Journal of Economics 10: 709–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. D., and Weiss, M. A. (1993): “Measuring Cost Efficiency in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry.”Journal of Banking and Finance 17: 463–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, P., and Shubik, M. (1978): “A Theory of Money and Financial Institutions. 28. The Non-Cooperative Equilibria of a Closed Trading Economy with Market Supply and Bidding Strategies.”Journal of Economic Theory 17: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, M. P. (1984): “An Appraisal of Property and Casualty Post-Assessment Guaranty Funds.”Journal of Insurance Regulation 2: 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J., Melander, E., and Shilling, N. (1971): “Economies of Scale in the Property and Liability Insurance Industry.”Journal of Risk and Insurance 38: 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, R. J. (1962): “Scale Economies in Financial Enterprises.”Journal of Political Economy 66: 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. L. (1973): “Cartels, Competition, and Regulation in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry.”Bell Journal of Economics 4: 375–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, R. E., and Roth, A. E. (1982): “Risk Aversion and the Negotiation of Insurance Contracts.”Journal of Risk and Insurance 59: 372–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H., and Pauly, M. V. (1985): “Market Equilibrium with Private Knowledge: an Insurance Example.”Journal of Public Economics 26: 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. G. (1989):Economies of Scale and Economies of Scope for Direct Writers in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Risk and Insurance, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-H. (1994):A Linear Programming Approach to Efficiency Measurement in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry. Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Risk Management and Insurance, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Insurance Commissioners (1993):Report on Profitability by Line by State, 1993. Kansas City, MO: National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, M. R. (1995): “A Theory of Risk, Return, and Solvency.”Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 17: 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, M. R., and Shubik, M. (1997): “On the Tradeoff between the Law of Large Numbers and Oligopoly in Insurance.” Working Paper, School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, M. R., Shubik, M., and Yao, S. T. (1994): “Insurance Market Games: Scale Effects and Public Policy.” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper no. 1076, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirin, D. G., Halpern, P. J., Kalymon, B. A., Mathewson, G. F., and Walters, W. R. (1974):Competition, Economic Efficiency, and Profitability in the Canadian Property and Casualty Insurance Industry. Toronto: Insurance Bureau of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, H. (1984): “Two-Person Insurance Negotiation.”Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 3: 147–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, S. (1989): “Pooling Intensifies Joint Failure Risk.” Working Paper 89-01, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. (1984):A Game-Theoretic Approach to Political Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., and Kane, S. A. (1994): “The Law of Large Numbers and the Strength of Insurance.” InInsurance, Risk Management, and Public Policy, edited by S. Gustavson and S. Harrington. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Powers, M.R., Shubik, M. & Yao, S.T. Insurance market games: Scale effects and public policy. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 67, 109–134 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236065

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation