Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of vector cutting on its recombination with the chromosomal immunoglobulin gene in hybridoma cells

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

We have analyzed the effects of linearizing vector DNA on the frequency and pathway of its recombination with the homologous chromosomal gene. The pSV2neo vector bearing a 4.3-kb fragment encoding the mouse immunoglobulin μ heavy chain constant (Cμ) region was cut either at sites within the Cμ segment or outside Cμ and then transferred to hybridoma cells bearing a mutant μ gene. The frequency of recombinant cells producing normal μ was then measured. For most cut sites, whether in regions of homology or of nonhomology, linearization of the transferred DNA enhanced the recombination frequency between the vector and chromosomal μ genes. When the vector was either uncut or cut at SacI in the region of homology, G418-resistant μ m+ recombinants were found to have integrated the vector by a single reciprocal homologous crossover; the enzyme site (SacI) used for cutting was present in the recombinants. By contrast, when the vector had been linearized at Pvul or SfiI in the region of nonhomology, vector integration involved nonhomologous crossovers, either between transferred DNA molecules or between transferred and chromosomal DNA, and the vector cut sites were absent in these recombinants. Some recombinants were found to have an unaltered as well as recombinant μ gene, suggesting that the nonhomologous recombination process might have involved sister chromatids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Capecchi, M.R. (1989).Science 2441288–1292.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Orr-Weaver, T.L., Szostak, J.W., and Rothstein, R.J. (1981).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 786354–6358.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Song, K., Chekuri, L., Rauth, S., Ehrlich, S., and Kucherlapati, R. (1985).Mol. Cell. Biol. 53331–3336.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jasin, M., and Berg, P. (1988).Genes Dev. 21353–1363.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shulman, M.J., Heusser, C., Filkin, C., and Kohler, G. (1982).Mol. Cell. Biol. 21033–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, M.D., Pennell, N., Bosnoyan, L., and Shulman, M.J. (1988).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 856432–6436.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shulman, M.J., Nissen, L., and Collins, C. (1990).Mol. Cell. Biol. 104466–4472.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gross-Bellard, M., Dudet, P., and Chambon, P. (1973).Eur. J. Biochem. 3632–38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Southern, E.M. (1975).J. Mol. Biol. 98503–517.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vindelov, L.L., Christensen, I.J., and Nissen, N.I. (1982).Cytometry 3323–327.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berger, S.L., and Kimmel, A.R. (eds.). (1987).Methods in Enzymology: Guide to Molocular Cloning Techniques. (Academic Press, New York), p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson, J.H., Berget, P.B., and Pipas, J.M. (1982).Mol. Cell. Biol. 21258–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wabl, M.R., and Burrows, P.D. (1984).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 812452–2455.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aguilera, R.J., Thomas, J.H., and Sakano, H. (1985).EMBO J. 43689–3693.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas, K.R., Folger, K.R., and Capecchi, M.R. (1986).Cell 44419–428.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Szostak, J.W., Orr-Weaver, T.L. Rothstein, R.J., and Stahl, F.W. (1983).Cell 3325–35.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baker, M.D., and Shulman, M.J. (1988).Mol. Cell. Biol. 84041–4047.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smithies, O., Ronald, G.G., Boggs, S.S., Koralewski, M.A., and Kucherlapati, R.S. (1985).Nature 317230–234.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Adair, G.M., Nairn, R.S., Wilson, J.H., Seidman, M.M., Brotherman, K.A., Mackinnon, C., and Scheerer, J.B. (1989).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 864574–4578.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ellis, J., and Bernstein, A. (1989).Mol. Cell. Biol. 91621–1627.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fell, H.P., Yarnold, S., Hellstrom, I., Hellstrom, K.E., and Folger, K.R. (1989).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 868507–8511.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, Y., Shulman, M.J. Effects of vector cutting on its recombination with the chromosomal immunoglobulin gene in hybridoma cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 17, 525–536 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01233617

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01233617

Keywords

Navigation