Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome aberration induction in Chinese hamster ovary cells by restriction enzymes with different methylation sensitivity

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

The isoschizomer pair MspI and HpaII were used to investigate whether the putative specificity of restriction endonucleases would be maintained when they were introduced into mammalian cells. Although both enzymes recognize the sequence CCGG, HpaII will cut only if the internal cytosine is unmethylated, whereas MspI will cut regardless of the methylation status. Cleavage results in a cohesive-end DNA double-strand break, which can lead to the formation of chromosome aberrations. Since mammalian DNA is heavily methylated, one would expect MspI to be much more effective than HpaII at inducing chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells. In fact, during G1, MspI induced a >90-fold higher number of aberrations than did HpaII. Cell cycle studies indicated that during early S there was a 30-fold increase in HpaII-induced aberrations. This increase may be due to increased accessibility of replicating hypomethylated DNA. Cells that were treated with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (AzdC) displayed only a moderate increase in HpaII-induced aberrations during G1. This observation, together with the results of restriction enzyme analysis of genomic DNA, indicated that demethylation was incomplete. The effects of AzdC on the induction of aberrations by MspI suggested that AzdC increases chromatin accessibility. Our results were consistent with the expected specificity of MspI and HpaII. Thus, it appears that restriction endonucleases can play a useful role in determining the biological consequences of DNA double-strand breaks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Morgan, W.F., Fero, M.L., Land, M.C., and Winegar, R.A. (1988).Mol. Cell. Biol. 84204–4211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Winegar, R.A., Phillips, J.W., Youngblom, J.H., and Morgan, W.F. (1989).Mutat. Res. 22549–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan, W.F., Chung, H.W., Phillips, J.W., and Winegar, R.A. (1989).Mutat. Res. 226203–209.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan, W.F., and Winegar, R.A. (1990). InChromosomal Aberrations: Basic and Applied Aspects, (Eds.) G. Obe and A.T. Natarajan (Springer Verlag, Berlin) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, D.N. (1983).Hum. Genet. 64315–333.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho, L., Bohr, V.A., and Hanawalt, P.C. (1989).Mol. Cell. Biol. 91594–1603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murnane, J.P. (1986).Mol. Cell. Biol. 6549–558.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan, W.F., Ager, D., Chung, H.W., Ortiz, T., Phillips, J.W., and Winegar, R.A. (1989). InMetabolism, Testing Methods and Chromosomes, (ed.) Mendelsohn, M.L. (Alan R. Liss, New York) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, O.J., Schnedl, W., Allen, J., and Erlanger, B.F. (1974).Nature 251636–637.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Christman, J.K., Schneiderman, N., and Acs, G. (1985).J. Biol. Chem. 2604059–4068.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winegar, R.A., Phillips, J.W., Lutze, L.H. et al. Chromosome aberration induction in Chinese hamster ovary cells by restriction enzymes with different methylation sensitivity. Somat Cell Mol Genet 16, 251–256 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01233361

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01233361

Keywords

Navigation