Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of flanking base sequences on 5-bromodeoxyuridine mutagenesis in mammalian cells

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms of incorporation-dependent, 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-induced mutagenesis were analyzed in murine A9 cells that possess a single copy of theEscherchia coli gpt gene integrated into the chromosomal DNA as part of a shuttle vector. Four independently derived GPT mutants with single base changes within the integratedgpt gene were utilized in BrdU-induced reversion analyses to test the relative mutability of guanine residues in four different settings: the 5′ and 3′ guanine residues of a GG doublet, the 3′ guanine residue of a GGGG quartet, and the middle guanine residue of a GGG triplet. Two of the mutant lines possessed GG doublet sequences in which a GC→AT transition at either guanine residue of the doublet leads to restoration of GPT enzyme activity without restoring wild-type DNA sequence. Both lines were shown to be effectively reverted by BrdU incorporation-dependent mutagenesis, and sequencing of thegpt genes from numerous independently derived revertants of both lines demonstrated that greater than 90% of the revertants arose due to GC→AT transitions at the 3′ guanine residue of the doublet. BrdU-induced reversion of two additional GPT mutant lines demonstrated that the 3′ guanine residue of a GGGG quartet is efficiently mutated, while the middle guanine residue of a GGG triplet sequence is at least 10-fold less mutable by BrdU incorporation-dependent mutagenesis than the 3′ guanine residue of a GG doublet or GGGG quartet. All four mutant lines tested were equally revertible by treatment with the alkylating agent ethyl methane sulfonate. The results from this study define a sequence-specific mechanism for BrdU-induced, incorporation-dependent mutagenesis and demonstrate the use of reversion analysis for the determination of sequence specific effects at precise sites within a gene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Calos, M.P., Lebkowski, J.S., and Botchan, M.R. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 803015–3019.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashman, C.R., Jagadeeswaran, P., and Davidson, R.L. (1986).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 833356–3360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hauser, J., Seidman, M.M., Sidur, K., and Dixon, K. (1986).Mol. Cell. Biol. 6277–285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lebkowski, J.S., Miller, J.H., and Calos, M.P. (1986).Mol. Cell. Biol. 61838–1842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashman, C.R., and Davidson, R.L. (1987).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 843354–3358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson, R.L., and Ashman, C.R. (1987).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 13415–417.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashman, C.R., and Davidson, R.L. (1987).Somat Cell Mol. Genet. 13563–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson, R.L., Broeker, P., and Ashman, C.R. (1988).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 854406–4410.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cepko, C.L., Roberts, B.E., and Mulligan, R.C. (1984).Cell 371053–1062.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelbert, L.M., and Davidson, R.L. (1988).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 859143–9147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenspan, J.A., Xu, F., and Davidson, R.L. (1988).Mol. Cell. Biol. 84185–4189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gelbert, L.M., Wilson, M.M., and Davidson, R.L. (1990).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 16173–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, F., Greenspan, J.A., and Davidson, R.L. (1990).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 16477–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freese, E. (1959).J. Mol. Biol. 187–105.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Terzaghi, B.E., Streisinger, G., and Stahl, F.W. (1962).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 481519–1524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Skopek, T.R., and Hutchinson, F. (1982).J. Mol. Biol. 15919–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huberman, E., and Heidelberger, C. (1972).Mutat. Res. 14130–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaufman, E.R., and Davidson, R.L. (1978).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 754982–4986.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaufman, E.R. (1985).Mol. Cell. Biol. 53092–3096.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davidson, R.L., and Kaufman, E.R. (1978).Nature (London) 276722–723.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ashman, C.R., and Davidson, R.L. (1981).Mol. Cell. Biol. 1254–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lasken, R.S., and Goodman, M.F. (1984).J. Biol. Chem. 25911491–11495.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lasken, R.S., and Goodman, M.F. (1985).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 821301–1305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saiki, R.K., Gelfand, D.H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S.J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G.T., Mullis, K.B., and Erlich, H.A. (1988).Science 239487–491.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F., and Sambrook, J. (1982).Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weinstein, I.B., Jeffery, A.M., Jennette, K.W., Blobstein, S.H., Harvey, R.G., Harris, C., Autrup, H., Kasai, H., and Nakanishi, K. (1976).Science 193592–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lobanenkov, V.V., Plumb, M., Goodwin, G.H., and Grover, P.L. (1986).Carcinogenesis 71689–1695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Henderson, E., Hardin, C.C., Walk, S.K., Tinoco, I., Jr., and Blackburn, E.H. (1987).Cell 51899–908.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kresnak, M.T., Davidson, R.L. Effects of flanking base sequences on 5-bromodeoxyuridine mutagenesis in mammalian cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 17, 399–410 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01233065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01233065

Keywords

Navigation