Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of second-step mutations of class II and class III CHOaprt heterozygotes: Chromosomal differences in deletion frequencies

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

We have determined the nucleotide sequence surrounding a BclI restriction fragment length variation near theaprt gene of CHO cells. By BclI digestion of the PCR-amplified DNA from a variety of APRT-deficient mutants derived from CHO cells, we were able to infer the following. First, all three heterozygotes of class II, which are known to undergo the second mutational step via a large deletion event occurring at high frequency, are mutant at the chromosome Z4-linked allele, and wild type at the Z7 allele. Second, both class-III heterozygotes, which mutate to the APRT phenotype at low frequency, are mutant at the Z7 allele, wild type at the Z4 allele. A total of 12 class-I lines, defined as having already undergone a deletion event and yielding fully APRT mutants at low frequency were all found to have lost the Z7-linked allele. We conclude that the Z7-linked allele is substantially more susceptible to mutation by the large deletion event than is the Z4-linked allele. This supports a hypothesis we advanced earlier to explain the existence of the class-III heterozygotes but does not support previous work suggesting that a chromosomal inversion break-point junction near the Z4-linkedaprt allele is responsible for the high frequency deletion event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Jones, G.E., and Sargent, P.A. (1974).Cell 243–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meuth, M., and Arrand, J.E. (1982).Mol. Cell. Biol. 21459–1462.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson, L.H., Fong, S., and Brookman, K. (1980).Mutat. Res. 7421–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley, W.E.C., and Letovanec, D. (1982).Somat. Cell Genet. 851–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon, A.E., Taylor, M.W., and Bradley, W.E.C. (1983).Mol. Cell. Biol. 31703–1710.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adair, G.M., Stallings, R.L., Nairn, R.S., and Siciliano, M.J. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 805961–5964.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowy, I., Pellicer, A., Jackson, J.F., Sim, G., Silverstein, S., and Axel, R. (1980).Cell 22817–823.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon, A.E., and Taylor, M.W. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80810–814.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simon, A.E., Taylor, M.W., Bradley, W.E.C., and Thompson, L.H. (1982).Mol. Cell. Biol. 21126–1133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dewyse, P., and Bradley, W.E.C. (1989).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 1519–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Worton, R.G., Ho, C.C., and Duff, C. (1977).Somat. Cell Genet. 327–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siciliano, M.J., Stallings, R.L., and Adair, G.M. (1985). InMolecular Cell Genetics, (ed.) Gottesman, M.M. (Wiley, New York), pp. 95–135.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adair, G.M., Siciliano, M.J., Brotherman, K.A., and Nairn, R.S. (1989).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 15271–277.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adair, G.M., Nairn, R.S., Brotherman, K.A., and Siciliano, M.J. (1989).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 15535–544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dewyse, P., and Bradley, W.E.C. (1990).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 16225–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lea, D.E., and Coulson, C.A. (1949).J. Genet. 49264.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sanger, F., Miklen, S., and Coulson, A.R. (1977).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 745463–5467.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. (1989).Molecular Cloning Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ward, M.A., Yu, M., Glickman, B.W., and Grosovsky, A.J. (1990).Carcinogenesis 111485–1490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yandell, D.W., Dryja, T.P., and Little, J.B. (1986).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 12255–268.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belouchi, A., Bradley, W.E.C. Analysis of second-step mutations of class II and class III CHOaprt heterozygotes: Chromosomal differences in deletion frequencies. Somat Cell Mol Genet 17, 277–286 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01232822

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01232822

Keywords

Navigation