Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of modified atmosphere and vacuum packaging on the growth of spoilage and inoculated pathogenic bacteria on fresh poultry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fresh chicken breast meats inoculated withYersinia enterocolitica andAeromonas hydrophila were packaged in glass jars either containing different compositions of modified atmospheres (MA) (100% CO2; 80% CO2/20% N2), or in vacuo or containing air, and were stored at 3±1°C and 8±1°C. The changes in gas composition as well asY. enterocolitica, A. hydrophila, total aerobic bacterial, total psychrotrophic, Lactobacilli and Enterobacteriaceae counts were determined after 0,1,3,7,9,11 and 14 days of storage. The results show that while the growth ofY. enterocolitica andA. hydrophila were retarded following MA storage, the pathogens were capable of growth in MA and vacuum storage at both temperatures, for the inoculation levels studied. For total aerobic bacterial counts, there were no differences between the values for chicken breast meats kept in different atmospheres. Being packaged in CO2 had the greatest inhibitory effect on the growth of psychrotrophic aerobic bacteria during the first 3 days. Lactic acid bacteria levels of samples stored in MA conditions and in vacuo increased rapidly when compared to those levels of samples stored in air. It was also found that the effect of MA storage increased at 3±1°C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker RC, Hotchkiss JH, Qureshi RA (1985) Poultry Sci 64: 328–332

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker RC, Qureshi RA, Hotchkiss JH (1985) Poultry Sci 65: 729–737

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brody AL (1989) Modified atmosphere/vacuum packaging of meat. In: Brody AL (ed) Controlled/modified atmosphere/ vacuum packaging of foods. Food and Nutrition Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farber JM (1991) J Food Protect 54: 58–70

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bjerklie S (1993) Meat Poultry 39: 20–24, 84

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy NR, Armstrong DJ, Rhodehamel EJ, Kautter DA (1992) J Food Saf 12: 87–118

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aytaç SA, Gorris LGM (1994) World J Microbiol Biotechnol 10: 670–672

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas YO, Kraft AA, Rust RE, Hotchkiss DK (1984) J Food Sci 49: 1367–1371

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeitoun AAM, Debevere JM (1992) Fleischwirtschaft 72: 1686–1689

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anonymous (1992) Guidelines for the good manufacturing and handling of modified atmosphere packed food products. Campden Food and Drink Research Association, UK. Technical Manual No. 34, pp 6–47

  11. Seman DL, Dren KR, Littlejohn RP (1989) J Food Prot 52: 886–893

    Google Scholar 

  12. Genogeorgis C (1985) Int J Food Microbiol 1: 237–251

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hotchkiss JH (1989) Modified atmosphere packaging of poultry and related products. In: Brody AL (ed) controlled/modified atmosphere/vacuum packaging of foods. Food and Nutrition Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brody AL (1989) Microbiological safety of modified/controlled atmosphere/vacuum packaged foods. In: Brody AL (ed) Controlled/ modified atmosphere/vacuum packaging of foods. Food and Nutrition Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grau PH, Tomlins RI, Gray RJH (1985) J Food Sci 50: 482–485

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hotchkiss JH, Baker RC, Qureshi RA (1985) Poultry Sci 64: 333–340

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elliot PH, Tomlins RI, Gray RJH (1985) J Food Sci 50: 1360–1363

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bohnsack U, Knippel G, Hopke HU (1988) Fleischwirtschaft 68: 1553–1557

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gill CO, Harrison JCL, Penny N (1990) Int J Food Microbiol 11: 151–157

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marshall DL, Wiese-Leigh PL, Weels JH, Farr AAJ (1991) J Food Prot 54: 841–843, 851

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gill CO, Reichel MP (1989) Food Microbiol 6: 223–230

    Google Scholar 

  22. Buchanan RL, Stahl HG, Whiting RC (1989) J Food Prot 52: 884–851

    Google Scholar 

  23. Buchanan RL, Phillips JG (1990) J Food Prot 53: 370–376

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ingham SC, Escude JM, Mc Cown P (1990) J Food Prot 53: 289–291

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hudson JA, Mott SJ, Penney N (1994) J Food Prot 57: 204–208

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gill CO, Penney N (1988) Meat Sci 22: 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zeitoun AAM, Debevere JV (1991) Int J Food Microbiol 14: 161–170

    Google Scholar 

  28. Penney N, Hagyard CJ, Bell RG (1993) Int J Food Sci Technol 28: 181–191

    Google Scholar 

  29. Varnam AH, Evans MG (1991) Foodborne pathogens. Wolfe, UK

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harrigan WF, McCance ME (1976) Laboratory methods in food and dairy microbiology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zeitoun AAM, Debevere M, Mossel DAA (1994) Food Microbiol 11: 169–176

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ingham SC, Potter NN (1988) J Food Prot 51: 966–970

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ingham SC (1990) J Food Prot 53: 665–667

    Google Scholar 

  34. Daniels JA, Krisnamurti R, Rizvi SSH (1985) J Food Prot 48: 532–537

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hintlian CB, Hotchkiss JH (1987) J Food Prot 50: 218–223

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ahmad HA, Marchello JA (1989) J Food Sci 54: 274–276, 310

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özbaş, Z.Y., Vural, H. & Aytaç, S.A. Effects of modified atmosphere and vacuum packaging on the growth of spoilage and inoculated pathogenic bacteria on fresh poultry. Z Lebensm Unters Forch 203, 326–332 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231070

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231070

Key words

Navigation