Skip to main content
Log in

A decomposition theorem for convexity spaces

  • Published:
Journal of Geometry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We utilize the unifying framework of families of convexity spaces for the treatment of various notions of planar convexity and the associated convex hulls. Our major goal is to prove the refinement and decomposition theorems for families of convexity spaces. These general theorems are then applied to two examples: restricted-oriented convex sets andNESW-convex sets. The applications demonstrate the usefulness of these general theorems, since they give rise to simple algorithms for the computation of the associated convex hulls of polygons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruckner, C.K., and Bruckner, J.B.; “On Ln-Sets, the Hausdorff Metric, and Connectedness,”Proc. Amer. Math Soc.,13, 765–767, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohn, P. M.;Universal Algebra, Harper & Row, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dwinger, Ph.; “On the Lattice of the Closure Operators of a Complete Lattice,”Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde,VI, 112–117, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edelsbrunner, H.; “Intersection Problems in Computational Geometry,” Technical University of Graz and Austrian Computer Society, Graz, Austria, Institute für Informationsverarbeitung, Report F 93, 1982.

  5. Güting, R. H.; “Stabbing C-Oriented Polygons,”Information Processing Letters,16, 35–40, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grätzer, G.;General Lattice Theory, Birkhäuser, 1978.

  7. Jamison-Waldner, R. E.; “A Perspective on Abstract Convexity: Classifying Alignments by Varieties,”Convexity and Related Combinatorial Geometry, Proceedings of the 2nd University of Oklahoma Conference, (Kay, D. C. and Breen, M., eds.). Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics,76, 113–150, 1982. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York and Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kay, D. C. and Womble, E. W.; “Axiomatic Convexity Theory and Relationships between the Caratheódory, Helly and Radon Numbers,”Pacific Journal of Mathematics,38, 471–485, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klee, V.; “What is a Convex Set?,”American Mathematical Monthly,78, 616–631, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Levi, F. W. “On Helly's Theorem and The Axioms of Convexity,”Journal of the Indian Mathematical Society,15, 65–76, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lipski, W. and Papadimitriou, C. H.; “A Fast Algorithm for Testing for Safety and Detecting Deadlocks in Locked Transaction Systems,” Technical Report MIT/LCS/TM-181, Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT, 1980.

  12. Ottmann, Th., Soisalon-Soininen, E. and Wood, D.; “On The Definition and Computation of Rectilinear Convex Hulls,”Information Sciences,33, 157–171, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Preparata, F. P. and Shamos, M.I.;Computational Geometry, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rawlins, G. J. E. and Wood, D.; “Optimal Computation of Finitely Oriented Convex Hulls,”Information and Computation,72, 150–166, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rawlins, G. J. E. and Wood, D.; “Restricted-Oriented Convex Sets,”Information Sciences, 1989, to appear.

  16. Rawlins, G. J. E. and Wood, D.; “Orthoconvexity,”Computational Morphology, (Toussaint, G.T., ed.), 137–152. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sack, J.-R.; “Rectilinear Computational Geometry,” Doctoral Dissertation, Carleton University, School of Computer Science, 1984.

  18. Shamos, M. L; “Problems in Computational Geometry,” Doctoral Dissertation, Yale University, Computer Science Department, 1978.

  19. Sierksma, G.; “Extending a Convexity Space to an Aligned Space,”Indagationes Mathematicae,46, 429–435, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Soisalon-Soininen, E. and Wood, D.; “Optimal Algorithms to Compute the Closure of a Set of Iso-Rectangles,”Journal of Algorithms,5, 199–214, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Toussaint, G. T.; “Pattern Recognition and Geometrical Complexity,”Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition,2, 1324–1347, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toussaint, G. T. and Sack, J.-R.; “Some New Results on Moving Polygons in the Plane,”Proceedings of the Robotic Intelligence and Productivity Conference, 158–164, 1983.

  23. Valentine, F.A.; “Local Convexity andL n -Sets,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,16, 1305–1310, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Widmayer, P., Wu, Y. F. and Wong, C. K.; “Distance Problems in Computational Geometry for Fixed Orientations,”Proceedings of the 1st Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, 186–195, 1985.

  25. Widmayer, P., Wu, Y. F., Schlag, M. D. F. and Wong, C. K.; “On Some Union and Intersection Problems for Polygons with Fixed Orientations,”Computing,36, 183–197, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wood, D.; “An Isothetic View of Computational Geometry,”Computational Geometry, (Toussaint, G., ed.), 429–459. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yannakakis, M., Papadimitriou, C. H. and Kung, H. T.; “Locking Policies: Safety and Freedom from Deadlock,”Proceedings of the 20thAnnual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 286–297, 1979.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rawlins, G.J.E., Wood, D. A decomposition theorem for convexity spaces. J Geom 36, 143–159 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231029

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231029

Keywords

Navigation