Skip to main content
Log in

Miscellanea from the history of celestial mechanics

  • Published:
Celestial mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The KS-transformation introduced by P. Kustaanheimo and E. Stiefel into celestial mechanics is derived straight from the ‘Kepler Formulas’. There follow the treatment of the inverse Newton problem comprising the derivation of the differential equations of mechanics by J. Hermann and L. Euler and also remarks concerning the fundamental papers by Euler about the planet problem and then-body problem. The conclusion is a simple example given by A. Voss and H. Liebmann, for the differential equations of mechanics with non-holonomic condition, which is of ‘pseudoplanetary’ quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper originated from several stays at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich; Seminar of Professor E. Stiefel in 1973/74.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volk, O. Miscellanea from the history of celestial mechanics. Celestial Mechanics 14, 365–382 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01228523

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01228523

Keywords

Navigation