Skip to main content
Log in

More potential entrants may lead to less competition

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arvan, L. (1988): “Symmetric Equilibrium with Random Entry.”Mathematical Social Sciences, forthcoming.

  • Bain, J. S. (1949): “A Note on Pricing in Monopoly and Oligopoly.”American Economic Review 39: 448–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D. (1984): “Strategic Deterrence of Sequential Entry into an Industry.”Rand Journal of Economics 15: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damme, E. van (1983):Refinements of the Nash Equilibrium Concept. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. (1980): “The Role of Investment in Entry Deterrence.”Economic Journal 90: 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1982): “Recent Developments in Oligopoly Theory.”American Economic Review Proceedings 72: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., and Shapiro, C. (1986): “Entry Dynamics and Mixed Strategies.” InEconomics of Strategic Planning, edited by L. G. Thomas. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. (1987): “Cheap Talk, Coordination, and Entry.”Rand Journal of Economics 18: 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. W. (1979): “On Entry Preventing Behavior and Limit Price Models of Entry.” InApplied Game Theory, edited by S. J. Brams, A. Schotter, and G. Schwödiauer, Würzburg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1983):Oligopoly Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1973): “Games with Randomly Disturbed Payoffs: A New Rationale for Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium Points.”International Journal of Game Theory 2: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C., and Selten, R. (1980): “A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games.” Working Papers Nos. 91, 92, and 105. Institute of Mathematical Economics, University of Bielefeld.

  • Kalish, L.; Cassidy, H. J.; and Hartzog, J. (1978): “Potential Competition: The Probability of Entry with Mutually Aware Potential Entrants.”Southern Economic Journal 44: 542–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. I., and Schwartz, N. L. (1982):Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., and Wilson, R. (1982): “Sequential Equilibrium.”Econometrica 50: 863–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J. (1982): “Limit Pricing and Entry Under Incomplete Information: An Equilibrium Analysis.”Econometrica 50: 443–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nti, K. O., and Shubik, M. (1981a): “Noncooperative Oligopoly With Entry.”Journal of Economic Theory 24: 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1981b): “Duopoly With Differentiated Products and Entry Barriers.”Southern Economic Journal 48: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, E. C., and Visscher, M. (1977): “Sequential Location Among Firms with Perfect Foresight.”Bell Journal of Economics 8: 378–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1960):The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Second Edition, 1980.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten R. (1975): “Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games.”International Journal of Game Theory 4: 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R., and Willett, D. (1967): “Potential Entrants Discourage Entry.”Journal of Political Economy 75: 400–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. M. (1977): “Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing.”Bell Journal of Economics 8: 534–544.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank Kalyan Chatterjee, Joseph Harrington, and Gary Lilien for their comments or suggestions. The paper has also benefitted from the suggestions of the managing editor and the referees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nti, K.O. More potential entrants may lead to less competition. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 49, 47–70 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01227872

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01227872

Keywords

Navigation