Abstract
The general concept of a numerical study of the lunar motion is examined and a particular case is discussed in greater detail than was possible in an earlier paper. Particular emphasis is placed upon the distinction to be made between model inadequacies and numerical artifacts, since either type of problem may be present in a given study, but the sensitivity to one or the other depends on the methodology used.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clarke, V. C. Jr.: 1964,AIAA J. 2, 363.
Devine, C. J.: 1967, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Technical Report 32-1181.
Duncombe, R. L.: 1958,Astron. Papers Am. Ephem. 14, I, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington.
Garthwaite, K., Holdridge, D. B., and Mulholland, J. D.: 1970,Astron. J. 75, 1133.
Griffith, J. S.: 1971,Celest. Mech. 4, 54.
Melbourne, W. G., Mulholland, J. D., Sjogren, W. L., and Sturms, F. M. Jr.: 1968, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Technical Report 32-1306.
Melbourne, W. G. and O'Handley D. A.: 1968, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Space Programs Summary 37–51 (III), 4.
Mulholland, J. D.: 1967, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Space Programs Summary 37–45 (IV), 17.
Mulholland, J. D.: 1968,Astron. J. 73, S194.
Mulholland, J. D.: 1969,Nature 223, 247.
Mulholland, J. D. and Devine, C. J.: 1968,Science 160, 874.
Van Flandern, T. C. and Mulholland, J. D.: 1972,Comparison of Numerical and Numerical and Analytic Theories of the Motion of the Moon, in preparation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulholland, J.D. Numerical isolation of flaws in the lunar theory. Celestial Mechanics 6, 242–246 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01227786
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01227786