Abstract
This paper develops a simple general-equilibrium model of a closed economy. The economy under consideration produces two final goods, one private and one public, which are both produced with labor and an intermediate good under constant returns to scale. The intermediate good is produced by labor alone, and its production is subject to output-generated variable returns to scale. The public good can be interpreted as government spending on environmental quality, police protection, cultural activities, and publicly funded health care. The model is used to examine the impact of an exogenous change in labor supply on the size of the government, relative prices, and welfare. Within the context of the present study, an increase in labor supply can be attributed to either exogenous immigration or population growth. The model is also used to examine the relationship between the size of the country and the pattern of trade.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe, K. (1990): “Public Input as a Determinant of Trade”.Canadian Journal of Economics 23: 400–407.
Altenburg, L. (1992): “Some Trade Theorems with a Public Intermediate Good”.Canadian Journal of Economics 25: 310–318.
Anwar, S. (1992): “Government Spending on Industries and the Pattern of Trade between Underemployed Economies”.Journal of Economic Integration 7: 174–180.
— (1995): “An Impure Public Input as a Determinant of Trade”.Finnish Economic Papers 8: 91–95.
Anwar, S. (1996): “International Trade in the Presence of Public Goods and Variable Returns”. Paper presented to the 1996 meeting of the Canadian Economics Association, May 31 through June 02, 1996, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ont., Canada.
Clarida, R., and Findlay, R. (1992): “Government, Trade, and Comparative Advantage”.American Economic Review 82: 122–127.
Faini, R. (1984): “Increasing Returns, Non-traded Inputs and Regional Development”.Economic Journal 94: 308–323.
Feehan, J. (1996): “The Terms of Trade and Public Goods”.Journal of Economic Integration 12: 114–129.
Kemp, M., and Ohyama, M. (1978): “On the Sharing of Trade Gains by Resource-poor and Resource-rich Countries”.Journal of International Economics 8: 93–115.
Khan, M. A. (1983): “Public Inputs and the Pure Theory of International Trade”.Journal of Economics/Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 43: 131–156.
Manning, R., and McMillan, J. (1979): “Public Inputs, Production Possibilities, and International Trade”.Canadian Journal of Economics 12: 243–257.
Markusen, J., and Melvin, J. (1981): “Trade, Factor Prices, and Gains from Trade with Increasing Returns to Scale”.Canadian Journal of Economics 14: 450–469.
Okamoto, H. (1985): “Production Possibilities and International Trade with a Public Intermediate Good: a Generalization”.Economic Studies Quarterly 36: 35–45.
Quibria, M. (1993): “International Migration, Increasing Returns, and Real Wages”.Canadian Journal of Economics 26: 457–468.
Tawada, M., and Abe, K. (1984): “Production Possibilities and International Trade with a Public Intermediate Good”.Canadian Journal of Economics 17: 232–248.
Tawada, M., and Okamoto, H. (1983): “International Trade with a Public Input”.Journal of International Economics 14: 101–115.
Wong, K. (1995):International Trade in Goods and Factor Mobility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anwar, S. Public consumer goods, output-generated variable returns, and labor supply. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 65, 201–215 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01226935
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01226935