Skip to main content
Log in

Methodologic dependence of electroretinogram oscillatory potential amplitudes

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) protocol for eliciting oscillatory potentials uses a considerably lower flash intensity and a different preconditioning stimulus than the only oscillatory potential protocol used to predict progression of diabetic retinopathy. To determine if the ISCEV protocol will be useful in predicting progression of diabetic retinopathy, summed oscillatory potential amplitudes were measured by both protocols in a population of diabetics. Summed oscillatory potential amplitudes measured by the ISCEV protocol, although smaller, are highly correlated with the summed oscillatory potential amplitudes measured with the higher-intensity flash. Thus, summed oscillatory potential amplitudes measured with the ISCEV protocol should be useful in predicting outcome in diabetic retinopathy. Different signal processing filters used to extract oscillatory potentials from the electroretinogram waveform have a small, but significant, effect on summed oscillatory potential amplitude. Use of the caliper-square method or the summed peak-to-trough method for measuring oscillatory potential heights had an insignificant effect on measured oscillatory potential amplitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FIR:

finite impulse response

References

  1. Cobb WA, Morton HB. A new component of the human electroretinogram. J Physiol 1954; 123: 36P-7P.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Speros P, Price J. Oscillatory potentials: History, techniques, and potential use in the evaluation of disturbances of retinal circulation. Surv Ophthalmol 1981; 25: 237–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ogden TE. The oscillatory waves of the primate electroretinogram. Vision Res 1973; 13: 1059–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yonemura D, Aoki T, Tsuzuki K. Electroretinogram in diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1962; 68: 19–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simonsen SE. Prognostic value of ERG (oscillatory potential) in juvenile diabetics. Acta Ophthalmol 1975; 123 (suppl): 223–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bresnick GH, Korth K, Groo A, et al. Electroretinographic oscillatory potentials predict progression of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 1307–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bresnick GH, Palta M. Predicting progression to severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 810–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bresnick GH, Palta M. Oscillatory potential amplitudes: Relation to severity of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 929–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marmor MF, Arden GB, Nilsson S-EG, Zrenner E. Standard for clinical electroretinography. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 816–19. Reprinted in Doc Ophthalmol 1989; 73 (4): 303–311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wachtmeister L. Oscillatory potential recording. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, eds. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. St Louis, MI: Mosby Year-Book, 1991: 322–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Massof R, Drum B, Breton M. Ophthalmic electrophysiology with a microcomputer-based system. In: Mize RR ed. The microcomputer in cell and neurobiology research. New York: Elsevier, 1985: 448–66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 210–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghausi MS, Laker JR. Modern filter design. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice Hall, 1981: 389–98.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Algevere P, Wachtmeister L. On the oscillatory potentials of the human electroretinogram in light and dark adaptation, II: Effect of adaptation to background light and subsequent recovery in the dark. A Fourier analysis. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1972; 50: 837–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Severns, M.L., Johnson, M.A. & Bresnick, G.H. Methodologic dependence of electroretinogram oscillatory potential amplitudes. Doc Ophthalmol 86, 23–31 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01224625

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01224625

Key words

Navigation