Skip to main content
Log in

Shape sensitivity analysis using low- and high-order finite elements

  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general procedure to perform the sensitivity analysis for the shape optimal design of elastic structures is proposed. The method is based on the implicit differentiation of the discretized equilibrium equations used in the finite element method (FEM). The so-called semianalytical approach is followed, that is, finite differences are used to differentiate the finite element matrices. The technique takes advantage of the geometric modeling concepts typical of the computer-aided design (CAD) technology used in the creation of a compact design model. This procedure is largely independent of the types of finite elements used in the analysis and has been implemented in ah-version andp-version finite element program. Very accurate and stable shape sensitivity derivatives were obtained from both programs over a wide range of finite difference step sizes. It is shown that the method is computationally efficient, general, and relatively easy to implement. Some classical shape optimal design problems have been solved using the CONLIN optimizer supplied with these gradients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett, J.; Botkin, M. (Eds.) (1986) The Optimum Shape: Automated Structural Design. New York: Plenum

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braibant, V.; Fleury, C. (1984) Shape optimal design using B-splines. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 44, 247–267

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braibant, V.; Fleury, C. (1986) Shape optimal design—A C.A.D. oriented formulation. Engineering with Computers. 1, 193–204

    Google Scholar 

  4. Izadpanah, K. (1985) Computation of stress components in thep-version of the finite element method. DSc. dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO

    Google Scholar 

  5. Izadpanah, K. (1986) Evaluation of thep-version of the finite element method. MSC/NASTRAN Users Conference, March

  6. Mortenson, M.E. (1985) Geometric Modeling. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bohm, W.; Farin G.; Kahmann, J. (1984) A survey of curve and surface methods in CAGD. Comput Aided Geom. Des. 1, 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dhatt, G.; Touzot, G. (1984) The Finite Element Method Displayed. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fleury, C.; Liefooghe, D. (1986) Shape optimal design on an engineering workstation. Paper presented at the MSC/NASTRAN Users Conference, Universal City, CA March 20–21

  10. Liefooghe, D. (1986) An interactive graphics capability for shape optimal design, Master of Science Thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.

  11. Shyy, Y.K.; Fleury, C.; Izadpanah, K. (1987) Shape optimal design using high order elements. Paper presented at the 1987 MSC World Users Conference, Universal City, CA March 11–13

  12. Fleury C. (1986) Shape optimal design by the convex linearization method. In: The Optimum Shape: Automated Structural Design (Eds. J. Bennett; M. Botkins). New York: Plenum

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fleury, C.; Braibant, V. (1986) Structural optimization—A new dual method using mixed variables. Int. Numer. Meth. Eng. 23, 409–429

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liefooghe, D., Shyy, Y.K. & Fleury, C. Shape sensitivity analysis using low- and high-order finite elements. Engineering with Computers 4, 213–228 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213983

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213983

Keywords

Navigation