Economic Theory

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 505–530 | Cite as

Why are credit card rates sticky?

  • Loretta J. Mester
Research Articles


This paper investigates credit card rate stickiness using a screening model of consumer credit markets. In recent years, while the cost of funds has fallen, credit card rates have remained stubbornly high, spurring legislators to consider imposing interest rate ceilings on credit card rates. The model incorporates asymmetric information between consumers and banks, regarding consumers' future incomes. The unique equilibrium is one of two types: separating (in which low-risk consumers select a collateralized loan and high-risk consumers select a credit card loan), or pooling (in which both types of consumers choose credit card loans). I show that a change in the banks' cost of funds can have an ambiguous effect on the credit card rate, so that the credit card rate need not fall when the cost of funds does. Usury ceilings on credit card rates are detrimental to consumer welfare, so would be counter to their legislative intent.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ausubel, L.M.: The failure of competition in the credit card market. Amer. Econ. Rev.81, 50–81 (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berlin, M., Mester, L.J.: Credit card rates and consumer search. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 88-1/R, July 1992Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Besanko, D., Thakor, A.V.: Competitive equilibrium in the credit market under asymmetric information. J. Econ. Theory42, 167–182 (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Besanko, D., Thakor, A.V.: Collateral and rationing: sorting equilibria in monopolistic and competitive credit markets. Int. Econ. Rev.28, 671–689 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calem, P.S.: The strange behavior of the credit card market. Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 3–14, Jan/Feb 1992Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Card issuers face threat of legislation over interest rates. Banking Policy Report10, 2–3 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan, Y.S., Thakor, A.V.: Collateral and competitive equilibria with moral hazard and private information. J. Finance42, 345–364 (1987)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi, S.W.: Collateral and credit rationing under adverse selection, in Three papers on credit rationing under adverse selection. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1991Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gale, W.G.: Collateral, rationing, and government intervention in credit markets. In: Hubbard, R.G. (ed.) Asymmetric information, corporate finance, and investment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klemperer, P.: Markets with consumer switching costs. Quart. J. Econ.102, 375–394 (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milde, H., Riley, J.G.: Signaling in credit markets. Quart. J. Econ.103, 101–129 (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morgan, B.W.: Credit card interest rates: perceptions, politics and realities. Banking Policy Report11, 1 and 8–12 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peers, A.: Secured credit cards draw a better class of borrower. Wall Street J., p. 29 (1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riley, J.G.: Informational equilibrium. Econometrica47, 331–360 (1979)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.E.: Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quart. J. Econ.90, 629–649 (1976)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stiglitz, J.E., Weiss, A.: Credit rationing and collateral. In: Edwards, J. et al. (eds.) Recent developments in corporate finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stiglitz, J.E., Weiss, A.: Macro-economic equilibrium and credit rationing. Bell Communications Research, mimeo, 1987Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilson, C.A.: A model of insurance markets with incomplete information. J. Econ. Theory16, 167–207 (1977)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Loretta J. Mester
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Research DepartmentFederal Reserve Bank of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations