Advertisement

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Energy deposition by protons and alpha particles in spherical sites of nanometer to micrometer diameter

  • P. Olko
  • J. Booz
Article

Summary

Monte Carlo simulated proton- and alpha-particle tracks in water vapor were used to develop an analytical function for calculating number distributions of ionizations induced in spherical sites. For charged particles crossing the site, Fermi-like functions were used to approximate the ionization distributions. Ionization event distributions due to particles passing outside the site were approximated with an exponentially decreasing function. The function parameters were calculated for protons and alpha particles in the energy range 0.3–5.0 MeV/ amu and for site diameters of 1 to 1000 nm. The quality of fit obtained is very good for the particles, energy range and site diameters considered.

Keywords

Water Vapor Analytical Function Charged Particle Energy Range Function Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Feinendegen LE, Booz J, Bond VP, Sondhaus CA (1985) Microdosimetric approach to the analysis of cell responses at the low dose and dose rate. Radiat Protect Dosim 13 (No. 14):259–265Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Booz J, Feinendegen LE (1987) Applications of microdosimetry. In: Fielden EM, Fowler JF, Hendry JH, Scott D (eds) Proceedings of the 8th ICRR, vol 2. Taylor & Francis, London New York Philadelphia, pp 331–337Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson WE, Paretzke HG (1980) Calculation of ionization frequency in small sites. Radiat Res 81:326–335Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson WE, Paretzke HG (1981) Calculation of distributions for energy imparted and ionization by fast protons in nanometer sites. Radiat Res 87:521–527Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamm RN, Turner JE, Ritchie RH (1984) Calculated ionization distributions in small volumes in liquid water irradiated by protons. Radiat Res 97:16–24Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamm RN, Turner JE, Ritchie RH, Wright HA (1985) Calculation of heavy-ion tracks in liquid water. Radiat Res [Suppl] 8:104, S-20–S-26Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zaider M, Brenner DJ, Wilson WE (1983) The applications of track calculations to radiobiology. 1. Monte Carlo simulations of protons tracks. Radiat Res 95:231–247Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guenter K, Schultz W (1983) Biophysical theory of radiation action - a treatise on relative biological effectiveness. Akademie-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson WE, Miller JH, Paretzke HG (1988) Microdosimetric aspects of 0.3 to 20 MeV proton tracks. I. Crossers. Radiat Res 115:389Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Microdosimetry (1983) ICRU Report 36 (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kellerer AM (1971) An assessment of wall effects in microdosimetric measurements. Radiat Res 47:377–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rossi HH (1968) Microscopic energy distributions in irradiated matter. In: Attix FH, Roesch WC, Tochilin E (eds) Radiation dosimetry, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 43–92Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eisberg R, Resnick R (1974) Quantum physics of atoms, molecules, solids, nuclei and particles. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kellerer AM (1968) Mikrodosimetrie. Grundlagen einer Theorie der Strahlenqualität. GSF-Report B-1, November 1968Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    NL2SOL (1983) Programmpaket zur Behandlung nichtlinearer least squares Probleme. Kurz-information. KFA-ZAM-0022-MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paretzke HG (1987) Radiation track structure theory. In: Freeman GR (ed) Kinetics of nonhomogeneous processes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chmelevsky D, Kellerer AM (1977) Computations of microdosimetric distributions for small sites. Radiat Environ Biophys 14:123–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kellerer AM, Chmelevsky D (1975) Concepts of microdosimetry. II. Probability distributions of the microdosimetrie variables. Radiat Environ Biophys 12:321–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baum JW (1969) Comparison of distance- and energy restricted linear energy transfer for heavy particles with 0.25 to 1000 MeV/amu. In: Ebert HG (ed) Microdosimetry. Proceedings of 2nd Symposium on Microdosimetry. Euratom, Brussels, pp 653–666Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wingate CL, Baum JW (1976) Measured radial distributions of dose and LET for alpha and proton beam in hydrogen and tissue-equivalent gas. Radiat Res 95:231–247Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hamm RN, Turner JE, Wright HA (1985) Statistical fluctuations in heavy charged particle tracks. Radiat Protect Dosim 13:83–86Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Olko
    • 1
  • J. Booz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für MedizinJülich;Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations