Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 303–314 | Cite as

The relationship between sensitivity to 60-Hz electric fields and induced transmembrane potentials in plants root cells

  • M. Inoue
  • M. W. Miller
  • E. L. Carstensen
  • A. A. Brayman


Growth rates and cell diameters were determined from 12 species of plant roots exposed to a 60-Hertz (Hz) electric field of 360 Volts per meter (V/m) in an aqueous inorganic nutrient medium [conductivity: 0.07–0.09 Siemens per meter (S/m)]. The degree of growth depression ranged from zero to nearly 100 percent of control. Cell diameters ranged from 13.5 to 31.8 µm as an averaged value for procambial, cortical, and meristem cells. Sensitivity to the electric field as determined by root growth rate reduction increased with increasing cell size. Sensitivity also increased with increase in 60 Hz induced transmembrane potentials; the transmembrane potential threshold for growth reduction was about 6.0 mV and the potential for near-complete cessation of growth was about 10–11 mV.

Two different hypothetical mechanisms of action by which applied electric fields induce biological effects at the cellular level were tested. The two mechanisms pertain to different possible modes of action of applied electric fields: one mechanism postulates the involvement of the transmembrane field, the other mechanism postulates the tangential electric field as the important factor for inducing biological effects. The data support the transmembrane and not the tangential field mechanism. It is concluded that the effects observed are consistent with a membrane related mechanism and that there is a narrow range (a few mV) between threshold and debilitating induced membrane potentials.


Applied Electric Field Inorganic Nutrient Meristem Cell Cell Diameter Growth Rate Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cox C, Davis H, Miller MW, Robertson D (1980) Statistical analysis of root growth rate determination. Environ Exp Bot 20:389–396Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fröhlich H (1968) Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems. Int J Quantum Chem II:641–649Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inoue M, Miller MW, Cox C, Carstensen EL (in press) Growth rate and mitotic index inVicia faba roots exposed to 60-Hz electric fields. BioelectromagneticsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inoue M, Miller MW, Cox C, Brayman AA (1985) Absence of an electrolytic contaminant effect from a 60-Hz electric field exposure sufficient to reduce root growth rate ofPisum sativum L. Environ Exp Bot 25:89–97Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jaffe L, Nuccitelli R (1977) Electrical controls of development. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 6:445–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luther PW, Peng HB, Lin J J-C (1983) Changes in cell shape and actin distribution induced by constant electric fields. Nature 303(5912):61–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller MW, Carstensen EL, Kaufman GE, Robertson D (1979) 60-Hz electric field parameters associated with the perturbation of a eukaryotic system. In: Phillips RD, Gillis MF, Kaune WT, Nahlum DD (eds) Biological effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. (Proc. 18th Ann. Hanford Life Science Symp., October 1978, Richland, Wash). DOE Symposium Series 50. Technical Information Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, pp 109–116Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller MW, Carstensen EL, Robertson D, Child SZ (1980) 60 Hz electric field parameters associated with the perturbation of a eukaryotic cell system. Radiat Environ Biophys 18:280–300Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller MW, Economou P, Cox C, Robertson D (1982) Micronucleic formation inPisum sativum L. root meristem cells exposed to an electric field orγ-rays. Environ Exp Bot 22:271–275Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller MW, Dooley DA, Cox C, Carstensen EL (1983) On the mechanism of 60-Hz electric field induced effects inPisum sativum L. roots: vertical field exposure. Radiat Environ Biophys 22:293–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poo M (1981) In situ electrophoresis of membrane components. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 10:245–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robertson D, Miller MW, Cox C, Davis HT (1981) Inhibition and recovery of growth processes in root ofPisum sativum L. exposed to 60-Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2:329–340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robertson D, Miller MW, Carstensen EL (1981) Relationship of 60-Hz electric-field parameters to the inhibition of growth ofPisum sativum roots. Radiat Environ Biophys 19:227–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Voth PD, Hamner N (1943) Effects of nutrient solution concentration on the growth ofMarchantia polymorpha. Bot Gaz 104:591–601Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Inoue
    • 1
  • M. W. Miller
    • 2
  • E. L. Carstensen
    • 3
  • A. A. Brayman
    • 2
  1. 1.Radiation Center of Osaka PrefectureShinke, Sakai, OsakaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Radiation Biology and Biophysics, School of Medicine and DentistryThe University of RochesterRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringThe University of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations