Abstract
This contribution to design methodology reflects upon the barriers to effectiveness imposed by our tendency to gravitate towards the over-formal in human affairs. We see a correspondingly cleaned-up description of the process of design, a failure to consider its jagged elements and to take proper account of the non-formal in knowledge (e.g. tacit knowledge) and communication. Discipline in methodology is accordingly wrongly equated with formality. The failure of design to be effective is more likely for innovative design rather than routine design.
It is suggested by way of explanation that design methodology especially in the field of information technology is infused with the ghost of positivism, manifest in an unconditional belief in the value of rationality and an implied naive realist conviction about the fixed, singular and transparent nature of the environment for which design is undertaken.
We need to be able to work with uncertainty rather than try for its entire elimination. A breadth of approach in carrying out the activity of design is threatened by lack of attention to the variety of forms which knowledge and corresponding forms of discourse can take.
We undertake the disciplined reduction from the messy real work to metaphors tidy enough to work with, or models as they are usually misnamed.
The notion of “language of struggle” is invoked as a suitable metaphor for the non-formal discourse particularly relevant to innovative design. A complementary exploration is offered of socio-linguistic space which is the common context for design.
In view of the concern with social space necessary to effective design, it may be enlightening to consider the designer as applied anthropologist.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avison DE and Fitzgerald G (1988).Information Systems Development. Blackwell.
Bateson G (1989)Computer Discipline and Design Practice. Edinburgh University Press, Edingurgh.
Brookes WM et al. (1980).Mathematics and Language. Association of Teachers of Mathematics, Derby, UK.
Bruner JS (1966). (Ed). Towards a Theory of Instruction. In:Studies of Cognitive Growth: 10–11.
Chandrasekaran B (1988). Generic tasks as building blocks for knowledge-based systems: the diagnosis and routine design examples. In:The Knowledge Engineering Review. 3 (3).
Checkland P (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley, Chichester.
Eco U (1984).Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. MacMillan, UK.
Delaney K (1978). In:ATM Supplement 18. Derby, UK. Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
Dreyfus HL and Dreyfus SE (1986).Mind over Machine. Blackwell, Oxford.
Graves R (1975).Collected Poems 1975, Cassell.
Habermas J (1988).On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Polity Press.
Harrison A (1978).Making and Thinking: A Study of Intelligent Activities. Harvester Press.
Heath C and Luff P (1990). Disembodied conduct: task coordination in London Underground control rooms. In: Bannon, Robinson, Schmidt (Eds). Proceedings of theSecond European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Working (EC-CSCW'91), September. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Amsterdam.
Holy L and Stuchlik M (1983).Actions, Norms and Representations. Cambridge University Press.
Hunter LAC (1993). AI and Representation: A study of a rhetorical context for legitimacy.AI & Society 7 (3).
Ikuta K (1991) The Role of “Craft Language” in Learning “Waza”.AI & Society 4 (2).
Keats J (1817). Letter to G and T Keats, 13 December 1817. Kennedy N (1989)The Industrialisation of Intelligence. Unwin, London.
Kerman J (1985).Musicology. Fontana/Collins. London.
Maddison RN (Ed) (1983).Information System Methodologies. Wiley.
Moore SF (1975). Epilogue: uncertainties in situations. Indeterminacy in culture. In: Moore SF and Myerhoff G (eds).Symbols and Politics in Commural Ideology. Cornell University Press. Ithaca.
Potter N (1980).What is a Designer: Things, Places, Message. Hyphen Press.
Perkins RL (1969).Søren Kierkegaard. Lutterworth Press, UK.
Polanyi M (1983).Personal Knowledge. RKP, UK.
Qvortrup L (1991).Hi-Tech Network Organisations as Self-Referential Systems — New Paradigms in Organisational Communication Theory. Odense University, Denmark.
Robinson M, Bannon M (1991). Questioning Representations.Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work., Kluwer Academic Publications. Dordrecht.
Sällstron P (1991). The Essence of Dialogue. In: Goranzon and Florin (Eds)Dtalogue and Technology: Art and Knowledge. Springer, London.
Senker J (1993). The Contribution of Tacit Knowledge to Innovation.AI & Society 7 (3).
Trankell A (1972).Reliability and Evidence. Rotobeckman AB, Stockholm.
Thorpe J (1991).Computer Supported Knowledge Acquisition for a Participatory Regional Planning Method. MSc Dissertation. Kingston Polytechnic.
Whitley EA (1991). Two Approaches to Developing Expert Systems: A Consideration of Formal and Semiformal Domains.AI & Society, 5 (2).
Wittgenstein L (1953).Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thorpe, J. Innovative design and the language of struggle. AI & Soc 9, 258–272 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210608
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210608