Skip to main content
Log in

Demand deposit contracts, suspension of convertibility, and optimal financial intermediation

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper establishes that an optical contract, combining features of the well-known Diamond and Dybvig (1983) and Townsend (1979, 1983) models, resembles banking. The contract and the associated allocations are derived from a social planner's problem which contains the Diamond and Dybvig and Townsend models as sub-problems. The analysis accomplishes the following. It unites the liquidity preference and cost minimization literatures in a simple way; resolves the demand deposit/demand equity problem in the Diamond and Dybvig model; introduces a notion of efficient bankruptcies into the liquidity preference literature; and raises some questions about the government regulation vs. laissez faire banking debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bryant J (1980) A model of reserves, bank runs, and deposit insurance. J Bank Finance 4: 335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris C, Kahn C (1988) The role of demandable debt in structuring optimal banking arrangements. University of Illinois, mimeo

  • Chari VV, Jagannathan R (1988) Banking panics, information and rational expectations equilibrium. J Finance 43: 749–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond D, Dybvig D (1983) Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. J Pol Econ 91: 401–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineering M (1989) Bank runs and the suspension of convertibility. J Mon Econ 24: 443–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama E (1980) Banking in the theory of finance. J Mon Econ 6: 39–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M, Schwartz A (1963) A monetary history of the united States: 1867–1960. Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorton G, Haubrich J (1987) Bank deregulation, credit markets and the control of capital. In: Brunner K, Meltzer A (eds) Bubbles and other essays. Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy, vol 26. North Holland, Amsterdam pp 289–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacklin C (1987) Demand deposits, trading restrictions, and risk sharing. In: Prescott E, Wallace N (eds) Contractual arrangements for intertemporal trade. Minnesota Studies in Macroeconomics, vol 1. University of Minnesota Press

  • Jacklin C, Bhattacharya S (1988) Distinguishing panics and information-based bank runs: welfare and policy implications. J Pol Econ 96: 568–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacker J, Weinberg J (1989) Optimal contracts under costly state falsification. J Pol Econ 97: 1345–1363

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookherjee D, Png I (1989) Optimal auditing, insurance and redistribution. Q J Econ 104: 399–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Postlewaite A, Vives X (1987) Bank runs as an equilibrium phenomenon. J Pol Econ 95: 485–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1984) Private information, deposit interest rates, and the ‘stability’ of the banking system. J Mon Econ 14: 293–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend R (1979) Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J Econ Theory 21: 265–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend R (1988) Private information and limited insurance: explaining consumption anomalies. J Mon Econ 21: 411–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Villamil A (1988) Price discriminating monetary policy: a non-uniform pricing approach. J Publ Econ 35: 385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Villamil A (1989) Liquidity preference, costly state verification and optimal financial intermediation. BEBR Faculty Working Paper No. 89-1593, University of Illinois

  • White M (1989) The corporate bankruptcy decision. J Econ Perspect 3: 129–151

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank John Boyd, Joseph Haubrich, Jeffrey Lacker, Ramon Marimon, Edward C. Prescott, two anonymous referees, and especially Neil Wallace for useful comments. I also wish to thank the National Science Foundation for financial support from grant number 89-09242.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villamil, A.P. Demand deposit contracts, suspension of convertibility, and optimal financial intermediation. Econ Theory 1, 277–288 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210565

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210565

Keywords

Navigation