References
Ben Rafael Z, Menashe Y, Mimon R, Lipitz S, Bider D, Zolti Z, Dan U, Pariente C, Shalev J, Dor J, Lev-Ran D, Mashiach S: Limitations in the use of combined gonadotropin releasing hormone analog and human menopausal gonadotropin for in vitro fertilization.In Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technologies, S Mashiach, Z Ben Rafael, N Laufer, JA Schenker (eds.). New York, London, Plenum Press, 1990, pp 17–29
Scott TR, Toner PJ, Muasher SJ, Oehninger S, Robinson SH, Rosenwaks Z: Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 are predictive of in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1989;51:651
Tanbo T, Dale PO, Lunde O, Norman N, Abyholm J: Prediction of response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: A comparison of basal and clomiphene citrate-stimulated follicle-stimulating hormone levels. Fertil Steril 1992;57:819
Navot D, Rosenwaks Z, Margalioth EJ: Prognostic assessment of female fecundity. Lancet 1987;2:645
Pellicer A, Lightman A, Diamond MP, Russell JB, de Cherney A: Outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with low response to ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 1987;47:812
Ben Rafael Z, Strauss JF, Mastroianni L, Flickinger GL: Differences in ovarian stimulation in human menopausal gonadotropin treated women may be related to FSH accumulation. Fertil Steril 1986;46:586
Benadiva CA, Ben Rafael Z, Strauss JF, Mastroianni L, Flickinger GL: Ovarian response of individuals to different doses of human menopausal gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 1988;49:997
Ben Rafael Z, Benadiva CA, Ausmanas M, Barber B, Blasco L, Flickinger GL, Mastroianni L: Dose of human menopausal gonadotropin influences the outcome of an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1987;48:964
Meldrum DR, Wisot A, Hamilton F, Gutlay AL, Kempton W, Huynn D: Routine pituitary suppression with leuprolide before ovarian stimulation for oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 1989;51:455
Droesch K, Muasher ST, Brzyski R, Jones SG, Simonetti S, Liu HCH, Rosenwaks Z: Value of suppression with a GnRH-a prior to gonadotropin stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1989;51:292
Serafini P, Stone B, Kerin J, Banrofin J, Quinn P, Marrs R: An alternate approach to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in “poor responders”: pretreatment with a gonadotropinreleasing hormone analog. Fertil Steril 1988;49:90
Padilla SL, Bayat J, Garcia J: Prognostic value of the early serum estradiol response to leuprolide acetate in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;53:288
Adashi EY, Resnick CE, Hernandez ER, Hurwitz A, Roberts CT, LeRioth D, Rosenfeld R: Insulin like growth factor I as an intra-ovarian regulator: basic and clinical implications. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991;626:161
Homburg R, Eshel A, Abdulla HI, Jacobs HS: Growth hormone facilitates ovulation induction by gonadotrophins. Clin Endocrinol 1988;29:113
Coukos G, Artini PG, Volpe A, Silferi M, Barreca A, Minuto F, Genazzani GR: Improvement of ovarian response to induction of superovulation with combined growth hormonegonadotropin treatment.In Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technologies, S Mashiach, Z Ben Rafael, N Laufer, JA Schenker (eds). New York, London, Plenum Press, 1990, p 389
Ibrahim ZHZ, Lieberman BA, Matson PL, Buck P: The use of biosynthetic growth hormone to augment ovulation induction with buserelin acetate/human menopausal gonadotrophin during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization in women with a poor ovarian response. Fertil Steril 1991;55:202
Owen EJ, West C, Mason BA, Jacobs HS: Co-treatment with growth hormone of sub-optimal responders in IVF-ET. Hum Reprod 1991;6:529
Feldberg D, Ashkenazi J, Shelef I, Voliovich I, Ben-Rafael Z: Minidose GnRH is the treatment of choice in poor responders with high FSH levels in an IVF program. 48th Annual Meeting of the American Fertility Society, New Orleans, LA, Oct 31–Nov 5, 1992, abstr
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ben-Rafael, Z., Feldberg, D. The poor-responder patient in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. J Assist Reprod Genet 10, 118–120 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207732
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207732