Abstract
We revisit an improtant and challenging class of minimum weight structural plasticity problems, the feature of which is the presence of complementarity constraints. Such relations mathematically express the perpendicularity of two sign-constrained vectors and mechanically describe an inherent property of plasticity. The optimization problem in point is referred to in the mathematical programming literature as a Mathematical Program with Equilibrium Constraints (MPEC). Due to its intrinsic complexity, MPECs are computationally very hard to solve. In this paper, we adopt recent ideas, proposed by mathematical programmers, on smoothing to develop a simple scheme for reformulating and solving our minimum weight problem as a standard nonlinear program. Simple examples concerning truss-like structures are also presented for illustrative purposes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brooke, A.; Kendrick, D.; Meeraus, A. 1992:GAMS: a user's guide, release 2.25. Massachusetts: Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company
Chang, K.J. 1992: Optimality criteria methods using K−S functions.Struct. Optim. 4, 213–217
Cinquini, C.; Contro, R. 1984: Optimization of elastic-hardening structures in presence of displacement constraints.ASME J. Mech., Trans., Auto. Des. 106, 179–182
Corradi, L. 1978: On compatible finite element models for elastic plastic analysis.Meccanica 13, 133–150
Cottle, R.W.; Pang, J.S.; Stone, R.E. 1992:The linear complementarity problem. San Diego: Academic Press.
Dirkse, S.P.; Ferris, M.C. 1995: The PATH solver: a non-monotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems.Optim. Meth. Software 5, 123–156
Drud, A. 1994: CONOPT — a large-scale GRG code.ORSA J. Computing 6, 207–216
Facchinei, F.; Jiang, H.; Qi, L. 1996: A smoothing method for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints.Applied Mathematics Report AMR96/15, School of Mathematics, University of New South Wales
Ferris, M.C.; Tin-Loi, F. 1998: Nonlinear programming approach for a class of inverse problems in elastoplasticity.Struct. Eng. Mech. (to appear)
Fukushima, M.; Luo, Z.Q.; Pang, J.S. 1996: A globally convergent sequential quadratic programming algorithm for mathematical programs with linear complementarity constraints.Technical Report 960006, Department of Mathematics and Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University
Jiang, H.; Ralph, D. 1997: Smooth SQP methods for mathematical programs with nonlinear complementarity constraints.Technical Report, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne.
Kaneko, I. 1982: On some recent engineering applications of complementarity problems.Math. Prog. Study 17, 111–125
Kaneko, I; Maier, G. 1981: Optimum design of plastic structures under displacement constraints.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 27, 369–391
Kanzow, C. 1996: Some noninterior continuation methods for linear complementarity problems.SIAM J. Matrix Analysis & Appl. 17, 851–868
Luo, Z.Q.; Pang, J.S.; Ralph, D. 1996:Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Maier, G. 1970: A matrix theory of piecewise linear elastoplasticity with interacting yield planes.Meccanica 5, 54–66
Maier, G.; Lloyd Smith, D. 1986: Update to “Mathematical programming applications to engineering plastic analysis”.ASME Appl. Mech. Update, 377–383
Maier, G.; Munro, J. 1982: Mathematical programming applications to engineering plastic analysis.App. Mech. Rev. 35, 1631–1643
Rozvany, G.I.N.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1992: New optimality criteria methods: forcing uniqueness of adjoint strains by corner-rounding at constraint intersections.Struct. Optim. 4, 244–246
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1992: A technique for locating function roots and for satisfying equality constraints in optimization.Struct. Optim. 4, 241–243
Tin-Loi, F. 1998: On the numerical solution of a class of unilateral contact structural optimization problems.Struct. Optim. 17, 155–161
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tin-Loi, F. A smoothing scheme for a minimum weight problem in structural plasticity. Structural Optimization 17, 279–285 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207004
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207004