Skip to main content
Log in

Cacotheline as an oxidimetric reagent. Determination of Sn(II), Cu(I), Ti(III), Fe(II), V(II) and V(III)

Kakothelin als oxydimetriscbes Reagens. Bestimmung von Sn(II), Cu(I), Ti(III), Fe(II), V(II) und V(III)

  • Published:
Microchimica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Sn(II), Ti(III), Cu(I), Fe(II), V(III) and V(II) can be titrated potentiometrically with cacotheline in 1–4M hydrochloric acid, 0.5–2M hydrochloric acid, 0.5–1.5M sulphuric acid in presence of 4 ml of 10% EDTA solution in a total volume of 50 ml, 9–10M phosphoric acid, 4–8M acetic acid and 3–8M acetic acid respectively. Cacotheline can be used for the assay of tin plate and solder. The cacotheline undergoes a 2-electron reduction reaction. A cacotheline solution (0.005M) in 0.02M hydrochloric acid is fairly stable for several months. The conditional redox potentials of cacotheline have been determined in sulphuric, phosphoric and acetic acid medium.

Zusammenfassung

In 1–4M Salzsäure, in 0,5–2M Salzsäure, 0,5–1,5M Schwefelsäure in Gegenwart von 4 ml 10%iger EDTA-Lösung in einem Gesamtvolumen von 50 ml, in 9–10M Phosphorsäure, in 4–8M Essigsäure bzw. in 3–8M Essigsäure kann man die genannten Kationen potentiometrisch mit Kakothelin titrieren. Dieses eignet sich auch für die Untersuchung von Lötzinn. Kakothelin erleidet dabei eine 2-Elektronen-Reduktions-Reaktion. Seine 0,005M Lösung in 0,02M Salzsäure ist einige Monate beständig. Sein Redoxpotential in Schwefelsäure, Phosphorsäure bzw. Essigsäure wurde bestimmt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Szarvas and J. Lantos, Talanta10, 477 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. N. Rao, D. Sc. Thesis, Andhra University (1957).

  3. G. G. Rao, N. K. Murty, and V. N. Rao, Talanta12, 243 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. K. Murty and Y. P. Rao, Analyt. Chim. Acta97, 199 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. M. Kolthoff and R. Belcher, Volumetric Analysis, Vol. III, New York: Interscience. 1957. p. 622.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. E. Breit, J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chemists30, 504 (1947);31, 573 (1948);32, 589 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Birnbaum and S. M. Edmonds, Ind. Eng. Chem., Analyt. Ed.32, 589 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. F. Hatch and R. R. Estes, Ind. Eng. Chem., Analyt. Ed.18, 136 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. G. Rao and L. S. A. Dikshitulu, Talanta10, 295 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. G. Rao and P. K. Rao, Talanta13, 1335 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Matrka and Z. Ságner, Chem. Listy51, 68 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. M. Ellis and A. I. Vogel, Analyst81, 693 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murty, K.N., Rao, P.Y. & Chalam, K.G. Cacotheline as an oxidimetric reagent. Determination of Sn(II), Cu(I), Ti(III), Fe(II), V(II) and V(III). Mikrochim Acta 78, 21–28 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206687

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206687

Keywords

Navigation