Skip to main content
Log in

Aquatic biodiversity and the electric utility industry

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results from a 1995 survey of utility company biologists indicate that aquatic biodiversity is an emerging and poorly understood issue. As a result, there is some confusion about what aquatic biodiversity actually is, and how we can best conserve it. Only one fourth (24%) of the respondents said their company has a stated environmental policy that addresses biodiversity. Many respondents indicate that over the years they have not specifically managed for biodiversity, but have been doing that through their efforts to assure balanced indigenous populations. While regulations are still the major driver for biological work, an increasing number of companies are involved in voluntary partnerships in managing water resources. Of these voluntary partnerships, 70% have biodiversity as a goal. Biodiversity is becoming an increasingly common subject of study, and a vast majority (75%) of the respondents suggested it should be a goal for utility resource management. Conservation of aquatic biodiversity is a complex task, and to date most aquatic efforts have been directed toward fish and macroinvertebrates. Ecological research and technological development performed by the utility industry have resulted in a number of successful biopreservation and biorestoration success stories. A common theme to preserving or enhancing aquatic biodiversity is preserving aquatic habitat. Increasingly, ecosystem management is touted as the most likely approach to achieve success in preserving aquatic biodiversity. Several utilities are conducting progressive work in implementing ecosystem management. This paper presents the potential interactions between power plants and biodiversity, an overview of aquatic biodiversity preservation efforts within the electric utility industry, more detail on the results of the survey, and recent initiatives in ecosystem management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alm, A. 1991. Washington watch: New directions for EPA.BioScience 41:451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. D., and A. S. Flecker. 1993. Biodiversity conservation in running waters: Identifying the major factors that threaten destruction of riverine species and ecosystems.BioScience 43:32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanz, R. E., C. E. Hoffman, R. V. Kilambi, and C. R. Liston. 1969. Benthic macroinvertebrates in cold tailwaters and natural streams in the state of Arkansas. Pages 281–292in Proceedings of 23rd annual conference, Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies.

  • Breece, G. A., and B. J. Ward. 1996. Utility terrestrial biodiversity issues.Environmental Management. 20:799–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ERPI (Electric Power Research Institute). 1994. Research update on fish protection technologies for water intakes. EPRI TR104122.

  • Gilliland, E. R. 1992. Experimental stocking of Florida largemouth bass into small Oklahoma reservoirs. Pages 487–494 in Proceedings of the 46th annual conference, Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies.

  • Hauser, G. E. and D. I. Morris. 1995. High-performance aerating weirs for dissolved oxygen improvement. Pages 1696–1705in J. J. Cassidy (ed.), Waterpower '95: Proceedings of the international conference on hydropower, 25–28 July 1995. San Francisco, California, 1914 pp.

  • Hildebrand, S. G., M. C. Bell, E. P. Richey, J. J. Anderson, and B. E. Parkhurst. 1980. Analysis of environmental issues related to small-scale hydroelectric development II: Design and consideration for passing fish upstream around dams. ORNL/TM-73b, Environmental Services Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 10980, 78 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, C. C., J. J. Ney, and W. E. Kelso. 1986. Filling the void: Establishment of a pelagic fishery and its consequences to littoral fishes in a Virginia mainstream reservoir. Pages 166–177in G. E. Hall and M. J. Van Den Avyle (eds.), Reservoir fisheries management: Strategies for the 80’s. Reservoir Committee, Southern Division American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 327 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Master, L. 1990. The imperiled status of North American aquatic animals.Biodiversity Network News 3:5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves, R. J. 1992. The status and conservation of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Conservation Biology, 30 June 1992. Blacksburg, Virginia.

  • Olmsted, L. L., and W. D. Adair. 1981. Protection offish larvae at two southeastern power plants using skimmer walls. Pages 290–295in P. B. Dorn and J. T. Johnson (eds.), Advanced intake technology for power plant cooling water systems. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, 307 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, L. L., D. J. Degan, J. S. Carter, and P. M. Cumbie. 1986. Ash basin effluents as a concern to fisheries managers: A case history and perspective. Pages 261–269in G. E. Hall and M. J. Van Den Avyle (eds.), Reservoir fisheries management: Strategies for the 80’s. Reservoir Committee, Southern Division American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 327 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, E. P., F. C. Winchell, A. W. Plizga, E. M. Paolini, and C. W. Sullivan. 1995. Development and evaluation of the modular inclined screen (MIS). Pages 1742–1751in J. J. Cassidy (ed.), Waterpower '95: Proceedings of the international conference on hydropower, 25–28 July 1995. San Francisco, California, 1914 pp.

  • Shane, R. M., J. L. Davis, J. A. Niznik, and W. M. Seawell. 1982. Flow regulation weirs: An inexpensive way to meet instream flow requirements.Hydro-review Fall 6–8.

  • Williams, J. E., J. E. Johnson, D. A. Hendrickson, S. Contreras-Balders, J. D. Williams, M. Navarro-Mendoza, D. E. McAllister, and J. E. Deacon. 1989. Fishes of North America endangered, threatened, or of special concern.Fisheries 14:2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. 1996. E. O. Wilson to the defense.National Wildlife December/January:l0–17.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olmsted, L.L., Bolin, J.W. Aquatic biodiversity and the electric utility industry. Environmental Management 20, 805–814 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205960

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205960

Key words

Navigation