Skip to main content
Log in

The Box-Cox transformation-of-variables in regression

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The application of the Box-Cox transformation to the dependent and independent variables is discussed. Maximum likelihood and iterative GLS estimators are used and bootstrapping is carried out to compare the bootstrap sample variability with the finite sample variability (RMSE) and improve RMSE estimation. The biases of parameter estimators were shown to be substantial in small samples. The standard errors obtained from the Hessian matrix were a poor measure of the finite sample variability. Thet-ratios of the linear parameter estimators may not be normally distributed in small samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bard Y (1974) Nonlinear parameter estimation. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bickel PJ, Doksum SA (1981) An analysis of transformations revisited. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76:296–311

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackley P, Follain JR Jr, Ondrich, J (1984) Box-Cox estimation of hedonic models: how serious is the iterative OLS variance bias?. The Review of Economics and Statistics 66:348–352

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blaylock JR, Smallwood DM (1985) Box-Cox transformation and a heteroskedastic error variance: import demand equation revisited. International Statistical Review 53:91–97

    Google Scholar 

  5. Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformation. Journal of Royal Statistical Society 26 (ser B):211–243

    Google Scholar 

  6. Box GEP, Cox DR (1982) An analysis of transformations revisited, rebutted. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77:209–210

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boylan TA, Cuddy MP, O'Muircheartaigh IG (1982) Import demand equations: an application of a generalized Box-Cox methodology. International Statistical Review 50:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boylan TA, O'Muircheartaigh IG (1981) The functional form of the U.K. demand for money: a critique of a paper by Mills. Applied Statistics 30:296–299

    Google Scholar 

  9. Calzolari G, Panattoni L (1988) Alternative estimators of FIML covariance matrix: a Monte Carlo study. Econometrica 56:701–714

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dagenais MG (1978) The computation of FIML estimates in linear and nonlinear simultaneous equations models. Econometrica 46:1351–1362

    Google Scholar 

  11. Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics 7:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freedman DA, Peters SC (1984a) Bootstrapping a regression equation: some empirical results. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  13. Freedman DA, Peters SC (1984b) Bootstrapping an econometric model: some empirical results. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2:150–158

    Google Scholar 

  14. Granger CWJ, Newbold P (1976) Forecasting transformed series. Journal of Royal Statistical Society 38(ser B):189–203

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guerrero VM (1987) A note on the estimation of Atkinson's index of inequality. Economics Letters 25:379–384

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hinkley DV (1975) On power transformations to symmetry. Biometrika 62:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hinkley DV, Runger G (1984) The analysis of transformed data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79:302–320

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hopwood WS, McKeown JC, Newbold P (1984) Time series forecasting models involving power transformations. Journal of Forecasting 3:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hwang HS (1981) Demand for money: tests of functional forms and stability. Applied Economics 13:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  20. Judge GG, Griffiths WE, Hill RC, Lütkepohl H, Lee TC (1985) The theory and practice of econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Khan MS, Ross KZ (1977) The functional form of the aggregate import demand equation. Journal of International Economics 7:149–160

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim M (1991) Iterative generalized least squares estimation of the Box-Cox model. Working Paper, SAS Institute Inc.

  23. Megbolugbe IF (1986) Econometric analysis of housing trait prices in a third world city. Journal of Regional Science 26:533–547

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mills TC (1978) The functional form of the U.K. demand for money. Aplied Statistics 27: 52–57

    Google Scholar 

  25. Montmarquette C, Blais A (1987) A survey measures of risk aversion. Economics Letters 25:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  26. Poirier DJ (1978) The use of the Box-Cox transformation in limited dependent variable models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73:284–287

    Google Scholar 

  27. Smyth DJ, Dua P (1986) Inflation, unemployment and the median voter. Economics Letters 22:181–186

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spitzer JJ (1976) The demand for money, the liquidity trap, and functional forms. International Economicic Review 17:220–227

    Google Scholar 

  29. Spitzer JJ (1978) A Monte Carlo investigation of the Box-Cox transformation in small samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73:488–495

    Google Scholar 

  30. Spitzer JJ (1982) A primer on Box-Cox estimation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 64:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  31. White KJ (1972) Estimation of the liquidity trap with a generalized functional form. Econometrica 40:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wu CJ (1986) Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis. Annals of Statistics 14:1261–1295

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zarembka P (1968) Functional form in the demand for money. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63:502–511

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zarembka P (1974) Transformation of variables in econometrics, in: P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York): 81–104

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors acknowledge the helpful comments of two referees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, M., Hill, R.C. The Box-Cox transformation-of-variables in regression. Empirical Economics 18, 307–319 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205405

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205405

JEL Classification System-Numbers

Navigation