Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the effect of age on endometrial responsiveness to hormone replacement therapy: A histologic ultrasonographic, and tissue receptor analysis

  • Clinical Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Objective

Our objective was to characterize the endometria of women of various ages placed on similar estrogen/progesterone replacement regimens prior to attempted donor embryo transfer using histologic, ultrasonographic, and steroid receptor markers in order to determine if advancing age has a detrimental effect on uterine responsiveness to pharmacologic sex steroid replacement therapy.

Study Design

This was a prospective open clinical trial. Functionally agonadal women aged 25 to 60 years receiving hormone replacement therapy underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination of the uterus followed by a timed endometrial biopsy on artificial cycle day 21. Endometrial histology and estrogen and progesterone receptors were analyzed from biopsy material. Subjects were assigned to three groups according to age: Group I, aged 25 to 39 years (n =48); Group II, aged 40 to 49 years (n =61); and Group III, aged 50 to 60 years (n =13). Endometrial preparation was accomplished in all patients using the same sequential regimen consisting of oral micronized estradiol and intramuscular progesterone.

Results

Similar histologic, ultrasonographic, and steroid receptor characteristics were noted in all groups of patients regardless of age. A normal appearing midluteal secretory endometrium was demonstrated histologically in 85% of biopsies. However, 15% of biopsies exhibited intraluminal papillary excrescences within the glands and/or an increase in the normal gland-to-stroma ratio. Three patients, one from each group, did not initially respond to replacement therapy and required further treatment.

Conclusion

Functionally agonadal women exhibit normal or near-normal endometrial responses to sex steroid replacement therapy designed to imitate the natural cycle through the sixth decade of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Macaso TM, Francis MM, Lobo RA: Oocyte and preembryo donation to women with ovarian failure: an extended clinical trial. Fertil Steril 1991;55:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA: A preliminary report on oocyte donation extending reproductive potential to women over forty. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1157–1160

    Google Scholar 

  3. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams MA, Garris GJ, Guzman I, Sandler B, Grunfeld L: Poor oocyte quality rather than implantation failure as a cause of age related decline in female fertility. Lancet 1991;337:1375–1377

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenwaks Z: Donor eggs: Their application in modern reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 1987;47:895–909

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sauer MV, Stein A, Paulson RJ, Moyer D: Endometrial responses to various hormone replacement regimens in ovarian failure patients preparing for embryo donation. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991;35:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cassidenti DL, Miles RA, Vijod A, Press M, Paulson RJ, Sauer MV: Comparing responses to varying hormone replacement regimens prior to embryo donation: A histologic, serologic, and receptor analysis. Society for Gynecologic Investigation, 38th Annual Meeting, 1992, abstr 172

  7. Sakamoto C, Yoshimitsu K, Nakamura G, Ootsuka H, Yoshida K: Sonographic study of the endometrial responses to ovarian hormones in patients receiving ovarian stimulation. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1988;27:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  8. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J: Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril 1950;1:3–25

    Google Scholar 

  9. Press MF, Nousek-Goebl N, King WJ, Herbst AL, Greene G: Immunohistochemical assessment of estrogen receptor distribution in the human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. Lab Invest 1984;51:495–503

    Google Scholar 

  10. Press MF, Udove JA, Greene GL: Progesterone receptor distribution in the human endometrium. Am J Pathol 1988;131:112–124

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA: Embryo implantation following human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 1990;53:870–874

    Google Scholar 

  12. Check JH: Uterine receptivity in subjects with ovarian failure. Fertil Steril 1991;55:1208–1212

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holinka CF, Yueh-Chu T, Caleb ER: Reproductive ageing in C57B2/6J mice: Plasma progesterone, viable embryos and resorption frequency throughout pregnancy. Biol Reprod 1979;20:1201–1211

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA: Reversing the natural decline in human fertility: An extended clinical trial of oocyte donation to women of advanced reproductive age. JAMA 1992;268:1275–1279

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grunfeld L, Walker B, Bergh PA, Sandler B, Hofmann G, Navot D: High-resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium: A noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:200–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sauer, M.V., Miles, R.A., Dahmoush, L. et al. Evaluating the effect of age on endometrial responsiveness to hormone replacement therapy: A histologic ultrasonographic, and tissue receptor analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 10, 47–52 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204440

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204440

Key words

Navigation