Purpose
This study derives from the observation that a correlation exists between failed first attempts (FFA) at embryo transfer caused by one or more embryos remaining in the catheter and reduced pregnancy rates (20.3 vs 3.0%). The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between failed first attempts at transfer and contamination of the transfer set; the related aspects of cervix dilatation and late embryo transfer were also investigated.
Results
The following observations were made. Retention of embryos in the transfer sets significantly reduced the pregnancy rate (P =0.015); catheters contaminated with blood and cervical mucus indirectly contributed to this effect by increasing the incidence of failed first transfer attempts. Even though cervical dilatations, if indicated by uterus sounding, were done 2 days before embryo transfer, no pregnancies were effected in these 18 cases (P =0.0001). Late transfers of embryos, due to delayed fertilization or slow cleavage rates, yielded a pregnancy rate of 10.5%.
Conclusion
The approach of immediately retransferring retained embryos does not solve the problem of reduced pregnancy rates in FFA cases. It is suggested that ET should be repeated 1 day later in FFA cases in an attempt to improve pregnancy rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garcia JE: Conceptus transfer.In In Vitro Fertilization, HW Jones, GS Jones, GD Hodgen, Z Rosenwaks (eds). Baltimore, Williams & Williams, 1986, pp 215–220
Mitchell JD, Wardle PG, Foster Penelope A, Hull MGR: Effect of bladder filling on embryo transfer. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1989;6:263–265
Gonen Y, Dirnfeld M, Goldman S, Koifman M, Abramovici H: Does the choice of catheter for embryo transfer influence the success rate of in-vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod 1991;6:1092–1094
Kerrin JFP, Jeffrey R, Warnes GM, Cox LW, Broom TJ: A simple technique for human embryo transfer into the uterus. Lancet 1981;10:726
Englert Y, Puissant F, Camus M, Van Hoeck J, Leroy F: Clinical study on embryo transfer after human in vitro fertilization. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986;3:243–246
Schulman JD: Delayed expulsion of transfer fluid after IVF/ET. Lancet 1986;1:44
Parsons JH, Bolton VN, Wilson L, Campbell S: Pregnancies following in vitro fertilization and ultrasound-directed surgical embryo transfer by perurethral and transvaginal techniques. Fertil Steril 1987;48:691–693
Diedrich K, Van der Ven H, Al-Hasani S, Krebs D: Establishment of pregnancy related to embryo transfer techniques after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1989;4(Suppl):111–114
Strickler RC, Christianson C, Crane JP, Curato A, Knight AB, Yang V: Ultrasound guidance for human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1985;43:54–61
Meldrum DR, Steingold KA, De Ziegler D, Hamilton F, Randle D: Effect of loading method on embryo implantation rate using the Tomcat catheter. Fourth World Conference on in Vitro Fertilization, Melbourne, Australia. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986;3:145
Van der Merwe JV, Truter P, Sevenster C: Phase II of a successful university based in vitro fertilization programme. S Afr Med J 1987;71:223–226
Jones HW, Acosta AA, Garcia JE, Sansow BA, Veeck L: On the transfer of conceptuses from oocytes fertilized in vitro. Fertil Steril 1983;39:241–243
Leeton J, Trounson A, Jessup D, Wood C: The technique for human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1982;38:156–161
Lenz S, Leeton J, Rogers P, Trounson A: Transfundal transfer of embryos using ultrasound. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1987;4:13–17
Craft I, McLeod F, Edmonds K: Human embryo transfer technique. Lancet 1981;11:1104–1105
Bongso A, Ng S, Fong C, Ratnam S: Cocultures: A new lead in embryo quality improvement for assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1991;56:179–191
Wood C, McMaster R, Rennie G, Trounson A, Leeton J: Factors influencing pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1985;43:245–250
Egan DM, Gosden B, Barbar D, King Bridgewood EA, Robinson J, Ross CF, Barlow DH: Difficult embryo transfer: Influence on in vitro fertilization. Abstracts of the joint ESCO-ESHRE meeting, Milan. Hum Reprod 1990;5:84
Wisanto A, Janssens R, Deschacht J, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC: Performance of different embryo catheters in a human in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1989;52:79–84
Trounson AO, Mohr LR, Wood C, Leeton JF: Effect of delayed insemination on in-vitro fertilization, culture and transfer of human embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1982;64:285–294
Edwards RG, Fisher SB, Cohen J, Fehilly CB, Purdy JM, Slater JM, Steptoe PC, Webster JM: Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1984;1:3–23
Findley W, Gibbons W, Thompson J, Poindexter A, Rossavik I, Dodson M, Young R, Eaton S, Gitlin S: Improving transfer success with the use of a catheter with hydrolic continuity. Fourth World Conference on in Vitro Fertilization, Melbourne, Australia. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986;3:145
Yovich JL, Yovich JM, Edirisinghe WR: The relative chance of pregnancy following tubal or uterine transfer procedures. Fertil Steril 1988;49:858–864
Caspi E, Ron-El R, Golan A, Herman A, Nachum H: Early, late, and sequential embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization program: A preliminary report. Fertil Steril 1989;52:146–148
Kennedy TG, Squires PM, Yee GM: Mediators involved in decidualization.In Blastocyst Implantation, Serono Symposia, USA, K Yoshinaga (ed). Boston, MA, Adams, 1989, pp 135–143
Lewin A, Laufer N, Yanay N, Simon A, Zohav E, Berger M, Schenker JG: Double transfer of embryos in in vitro fertilization, or is there a delayed receptivity of the endometrium? J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1989;6:139–141
Navot D, Scott RT, Droesch K, Veeck LL, Liu H, Rosenwaks Z: The window of embryo transfer and the efficiency of human conception in vitro. Fertil Steril 1991;55:114–118
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Visser, D.S., Fourie, F.L.R. & Kruger, H.F. Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: Effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J Assist Reprod Genet 10, 37–43 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204438
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204438