Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental assessment of packaging: The consumer point of view

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When marketing environmentally responsible packaged products, the producer is confronted with consumer beliefs concerning the environmental friendliness of packaging materials. When making environmentally conscious packaging decisions, these consumer beliefs should be taken into account alongside the technical guidelines. Dutch consumer perceptions of the environmental friendliness of packaged products are reported and compared with the results of a life-cycle analysis assessment. It is shown that consumers judge environmental friendliness mainly from material and returnability. Furthermore, the consumer perception of the environmental friendliness of packaging material is based on the postconsumption waste, whereas the environmental effects of production are ignored. From the consumer beliefs concerning environmental friendliness implications are deduced for packaging policy and for environmental policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bethlehem, D. W. 1990. Attitudes, social attitudes, and widespread beliefs. Pages 65–78in G. Gaskel and C. Fraser (eds.), The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, M. R., and E. Karni. 1973. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud.Journal of Law and Economics 16:67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, R. 1990. Social representations as widespread beliefs. Pages 47–64in G. Gaskell and C. Fraser (eds.), The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, M. 1991. Voeding voor een goed milieu. Swokatern 17, SWOKA, 's Gravenhage [Food for a good environment. In Dutch].

  • Hoyer, W. D. 1984. An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product.Journal of Consumer Research 11(12):822–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, A. 1991. What does it mean to be green?Harvard Business Review 69:38–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman, J. M. 1993. Environmental assessment of packaging: Sense and sensibility.Environmental Management 17:575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tils, Ch. 1991. Het kopen van milieu(on)vriendelijke verpakkingen. Unpublished thesis. Agricultural University Wageningen [The buying of environmentally (un)friendly packaging. In Dutch].

  • van Dam, Y. K. 1994. Verpakt gemak: Gemak en ongemak van verpakte voedings-middelen. Pages 149–161in Y. K. van Dam, C. de Hoog, and J. A. C. van Ophem (eds.), Eten in de jaren negentig: Reflecties op gemaksvoeding. SELM 3, LU, Wageningen/Eburon, Delft [Packed convenience: Convenience and inconvenience of packaged food products. In Dutch].

  • van Dam, Y. K., and H. C. M. van Trijp. 1993. Consumer perceptions of and preferences for product packaging. Pages 1469–1484.in J. Chías and J. Sureda (eds.), Marketing for the new Europe: Dealing with complexity. Proceedings of 22nd EMAC conference, Barcelona.

  • van Dam, Y. K., and H. C. M. van Trijp. 1994. Consumer perceptions of and preferences for beverage containers.Food Quality and Preference 5(4):253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Dam, Y.K. Environmental assessment of packaging: The consumer point of view. Environmental Management 20, 607–614 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204134

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204134

Key words

Navigation