Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 263–274 | Cite as

Wetland loss and substitution by the Section 404 permit program in southern California, USA

  • Aaron O. Allen
  • Johannes J. Feddema
Environmental Auditing

Abstract

To test the effectiveness of the 404 permit program in preventing a net loss of wetland resources, 75 Section 404 projects permitted in the years 1987–1989 and located in a portion of southern California were evaluated. From this group of projects, 80.47 ha of wetlands were affected by Section 404 permits and the Army Corps of Engineers required 111.62 ha of wetland mitigation. To verify the successful completion of each mitigation project, all 75 project sites were visited and evaluated based on the amount of dead vegetation, growth and coverage, and the number of invasive species. Based on the field verification results, the actual amount of completed mitigation area was 77.33 ha, resulting in a net loss of 3.14 ha of wetland resources in the years 1987–1989. By comparing the types of wetlands lost to the types of wetlands mitigated, it is apparent that, in particular, freshwater wetlands are experiencing a disproportionately greater loss of area and that riparian woodland wetlands are most often used in mitigation efforts. The net result of these accumulated actions is an overall substitution of wetland types throughout the region. Results also indicate that, typically, large-scale mitigation projects are more successful compared to smaller projects and that successful compliance efforts are not evenly distributed throughout the region. We recommend that better monitoring, mitigation in-kind, mitigation banking, and planning on a regional or watershed scale could greatly improve the effectiveness of the Section 404 permitting program.

Key words

Wetlands Clean Water Act Southern California Wetland mitigation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Abernethy, Y., and R. E. Turner. 1987. US forested wetlands: 1940–1980.BioScience 37(10):721–727.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, A. 1993. Impact of the Section 404 permit program on wetland resources in southern California. MA thesis. University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  3. Brinson, M. 1988. Strategies for assessing the cumulative effects of wetland alteration on water quality.Environmental Management 12(5):655–662.Google Scholar
  4. Fenner, T. 1991. Cumulative impacts to San Diego County wetlands under federal and state regulatory programs 1985–1989. MA thesis. San Diego State University.Google Scholar
  5. Hardisky, M., and V. Klemas. 1983. Tidal wetlands natural and human-made changes from 1973–1979 in Delaware: Mapping techniques and results.Environmental Management 12(5):675–693.Google Scholar
  6. Holland, C., and M. E. Kentula. 1992. Impacts of Section 404 permits requiring compensatory mitigation on wetlands in California (USA).Wetlands Ecology and Management 2(3):157–169.Google Scholar
  7. Holland, R. F. 1986. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  8. Holloway, M. 1994. Nurturing nature.Scientific American 270(4):98–108.Google Scholar
  9. Josselyn, M., J. Zedler, and T. Griswold. 1989. Wetland mitigation along the Pacific coast of the United States. Pages 3–36in J. Kusler and M. Kentula (eds.), Wetland creation and restoration: The status of the science. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Kentula, M., J. C. Sifneos, J. W. Good, M. Rylko, and K. Kunz. 1992. Trends and patterns in Section 404 permitting requiring compensatory mitigation in Oregon and Washington, USA.Environmental Management 16(1):95–108.Google Scholar
  11. Kentula, M., R. P. Brooks, S. E. Gwin, C. C. Holland, A. D. Sherman, and J. C. Sifneos. 1993. An approach to improving decision making in wetland restoration and creation. C. K. Smoley Inc.; Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  12. Kusler J., and M. Kentula. 1989. Wetland creation and restoration: The status of the science. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Mager, A., and R. Ruebsamen. 1988. National Marine Fisheries Service habitat conservation efforts in the coastal southeastern United States for 1987.Marine Fisheries Review 50(3):43–50.Google Scholar
  14. Mager, A., and G. W. Thayer. 1986. National Marine Fisheries Service habitat conservation efforts in the southeast region of the United States from 1981 through 1985.Marine Fisheries Review 48(3):1–8.Google Scholar
  15. Mitsch, W. J., and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Orme, A. R. 1990. Wetland morphology, hydrodynamics and sedimentation. Pages 42–94in M. Williams (ed.), Wetlands: A threatened landscape. Basil Blackwell Ltd., Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Owen, C., and J. Harvey. 1992. Wetland protection as landuse planning: The impact of Section 404 in Wisconsin, USA.Environmental Management 16(3):345–353.Google Scholar
  18. Race, M. 1985. Critique of present wetlands mitigation policies in the United States based on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay.Environmental Management 14(6):799–807.Google Scholar
  19. Sifneos, J. C., P. Price, and M. E. Kentula. 1992a. Effects of Section 404 permitting on freshwater wetlands in Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi.Wetlands 12(1):28–36.Google Scholar
  20. Sifneos, J. C., M. E. Kentula, and P. Price. 1992b. Impacts of Section 404 permits requiring compensatory mitigation of freshwater wetlands in Texas and Arkansas.The Texas Journal of Science 44(4):475–485.Google Scholar
  21. Stein, E. 1995. Assessment of the cumulative impacts of Section 404 Clean Water Act permitting on the ecology of the Santa Margarita, California watershed. PhD dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  22. USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers). 1986. Federal Register, Department of the Army, regulatory programs; final rule, 13 November 1986.Google Scholar
  23. USACE (United States Army Corp of Engineers). 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineating manual. Department of the Army Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, January 1987.Google Scholar
  24. US Department of the Interior. 1994. The impact of federal programs on wetlands, vol. II, a report to Congress by the Secretary of the Interior, Washington DC, March 1994.Google Scholar
  25. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1991. Mitigation banking guidance. US Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  26. USHR (United States House of Representatives). 1988. Hearing before the committee on public works and transportation: Administration of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. One Hundredth Congress, 14 September 1988.Google Scholar
  27. Warner, R. E., and K. M. Hendrix. 1985. Riparian resources of the Central Valley and the California Desert. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  28. World Resources Institute. 1994. World resources. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Zedler, J. 1985. Salt marsh restoration: A guidebook for southern California. California Sea Grant Report No. T-CSGCP-009.Google Scholar
  30. Zedler, J., and R. Langis. 1990. A manual for assessing restored and natural wetlands: With examples from southern California. Pacific Estuarine Research Laboratory, Biology Department, San Diego State University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aaron O. Allen
    • 1
  • Johannes J. Feddema
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations