Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 185–193 | Cite as

A method to assess the allocation suitability of recreational activities: An economic approach

  • Hsiao-Lin Wang
Profile

Abstract

Most existing methods of planning focus on development of a recreational area; less consideration is placed on the allocation of recreational activities within a recreational area. Most existing research emphasizes the economic benefits of developing a recreational area; few authors assessed the allocation suitability of recreational activities from an economic point of view. The purpose of this work was to develop a model to assess the allocation suitability of recreational activities according to the application of a concept of analysis of cost and benefit under a premise of ecological concern. The model was verified with a case study of Taiwan. We suggest that the proposed model should form a critical part of recreational planning.

Key words

Land suitability analysis Cost-benefit analysis Allocation Recreational activity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Binkley, C. S., and R. O. Mendelsohn. 1987. Recreation user fees. II. An economic analysis.Journal of Forestry 85:31–35.Google Scholar
  2. Economic Development Board. 1983. A study on the Recreation System of Taiwan. A government report. Taipei, p. 136.Google Scholar
  3. FitzGerald, E. V. K. 1978. Public sector investment planning for developing countries. MacMillan, London, pp. 107–108.Google Scholar
  4. Harris, C. C., and B. L. Driver. 1987. Recreation user fees: I. pros and cons.Journal of Forestry 85:25–29.Google Scholar
  5. Hof, J. G. and D. H. Rosenthal. 1987. Valuing the opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models: An application to aggregate data.Journal of Leisure Research 19(3):159–173.Google Scholar
  6. Hopkins, L. D. 1977. Methods for generating land suitability maps: A comparative evaluation.Journal of the American Institute of Planners 43:386–400.Google Scholar
  7. Loomis, J. B. 1989. Estimating the economic activity and value from public parks and outdoor recreation areas in California.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 7(2):56–65.Google Scholar
  8. McHarg, I. 1969. Design with nature. American Museum of Natural History, New York, pp. 7–17.Google Scholar
  9. Pearce, D. W. 1971. Cost-benefit Analysis. MacMillan, London, pp. 34–38.Google Scholar
  10. Shaw, Y. Z. 1985. Cost-benefit analysis. Kao-chang Publishing, Taipei, p. 16.Google Scholar
  11. Wang, H. L. 1994. A landscape ecological method for evaluating allocation suitability of hillside recreation activities.Journal of Outdoor Recreation Study 7(1):49–79.Google Scholar
  12. Wang, H. L. 1996. A systematic approach to natural recreational resource management.Journal of Socio-Economic Planning Science, (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hsiao-Lin Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Landscape ArchitectureTunghai UniversityTaichungROC

Personalised recommendations