Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 175–184 | Cite as

Socially cooperative choices: An approach to achieving resource sustainability in the coastal zone

  • Colin Crance
  • Dianne Draper
Forum

Abstract

Achieving resource sustainability, particularly in the coastal zone, is complicated by a variety of interdependencies and trade-offs between economic, social, and ecological variables. Although trade-offs between each of these variables are important, this paper emphasizes the social components of resource management. In this regard a distinction is made between individual and cooperative choices. Individual choices frequently are made from a shortterm, self-interested perspective, whereas cooperative choices are made from a long-term, community and resource-sustainability perspective. Typically, when presented with a spectrum of resource management decisions, individuals have a tendency to act in a self-interested manner. Thus, cooperative benefits, such as reduced conflict and improved resource certainty, are not realized. An overview of selected aspects of social dilemma theory suggests that socially cooperative choice outcomes are attainable in coastal zone management by integrating structural and behavioral solutions in resource use decision making. Three barriers to successful integration of structural and behavioral solutions are identified as self-interest, mistrust, and variable perceptions of resource amenities. Examples from coastal zone management indicate that these barriers may be overcome using approaches such as scopereduction, co-management, community education, and local participation. The paper also provides comment on the potential benefits of integrating structural and behavioral solutions in international coastal zone management efforts.

Key words

Behavioral solutions Cooperation Integration Mistrust Self-interest Social dilemmas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literated Cited

  1. Berkes, F. 1989. Co-management and the James Bay Agreement. Pages 189–208in E Pinkerton (ed.), Co-operative management of local fisheries. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  2. Berkes, F., and D. Feeny. 1990. Paradigms lost: Changing views on the use of common property resources.Alternatives 17:48–55.Google Scholar
  3. Berkes, F., D. Feeny, B. J. McCay, and J. M. Acheson. 1989. The benefits of the commons.Nature 340:91–93.Google Scholar
  4. Brunson, M. 1992. Professional bias and public perspectives.Consortium for the Social Values of Natural Resources Newsletter Winter:8–9.Google Scholar
  5. Center for the Study of Marine Policy. 1992. The Rio Declaration on environment and development.The Earth Summit and the Oceans Report No. 4, pp 3–5.Google Scholar
  6. Coastal Resources Center. 1991. Agenda 21 text on integrated management and substainable development of coastal areas.Intercoast Network 16:4–7.Google Scholar
  7. Daoutopoulos, G. A., and M. Pyrovetsi. 1990. Comparison of conservation attitudes among fishermen in three protected lakes in Greece.Journal of Environmental Management 31:83–92.Google Scholar
  8. Day, J. C., and D. B. Gamble. 1990. Coastal zone management in British Columbia: An institutional comparison with Washington, Oregon and California.Coastal Management 18:115–141.Google Scholar
  9. Draper, D., and A. Driscoll. 1991. Development dilemmas: enhancing sustainable tourism through cooperative choices.Publication de l'AIEST 33:157–173.Google Scholar
  10. Edney, J. J. 1980. The commons problem—alternative perspectives.American Psychologist 35:131–150.Google Scholar
  11. Gale, R. J. P. 1991. Environment and development: attitudinal impediments to policy integrationEnvironmental Conservation 18:228–236.Google Scholar
  12. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons.Science 162:1243–1248.Google Scholar
  13. Hennessey, T. M. 1994. Governance and adaptive management for estuarine ecosystems: The case of Chesapeake Bay.Coastal Management 22:119–145.Google Scholar
  14. Kartez, J. D. 1991. Planning for cooperation in environmental dilemmas.Journal of Planning Literature 5:226–237.Google Scholar
  15. Kenchington, R. A. 1990. Managing marine environments. Taylor and Francis, New York, 248 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Messick, M., and K. Brewer. 1983. Solving social dilemmas: A review.Review of Personality and Social Psychology 4:10–43.Google Scholar
  17. M'Gonigle, M. 1989. Sustainability and local government: the case of the British Columbia Islands Trust.Canadian Public Administration 32:524–544.Google Scholar
  18. Nelson, J. G. 1992. Sustainable development: A heritage and human ecological perspective.The Operational Geographer 10:6–8.Google Scholar
  19. Wiener, J. L., and T. A. Doescher. 1991. A framework for promoting cooperation.Journal of Marketing 55:38–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin Crance
    • 1
  • Dianne Draper
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Department of GeographyThe University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations