Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prairie dog poisoning in northern Great Plains: An analysis of programs and policies

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the programs and policies regarding prairie dog control in the northern Great Plains states of Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming. The poisoning programs of federal and state agencies are described, along with the statutes and legal mandates that shape agency management of prairie dogs. Current policies on National Grasslands and other federal lands typically limit prairie dogs to small percentages of available potential habitat, to the detriment of prairie dogs and associated species. State programs to assist landowners in prairie dog control differ greatly, employing cost-share incentives (Wyoming) and regulatory fines (South Dakota) to encourage the poisoning of prairie dogs. Prairie dog control is not actively funded or practiced by state or county agencies in Montana. We document federal and state involvement in more than 1 million acres of prairie dog poisoning in the study area during 1978–1992. In combination with undocumented poisoning by private landowners, plague, and shooting, prairie dogs may be experiencing net regional declines, contributing to the disintegration of the prairie dog ecosystem. We recommend that Animal Damage Control operations concerning prairie dogs be terminated, on the basis that they duplicate state programs and are at cross purposes with federal wildlife management programs that seek to perpetuate and/or recover wildlife species that depend on the prairie dog ecosystem. We further recommend that federal range improvement funds be offered as subsidies for the integration of prairie dogs in range management, as opposed to funding prairie dog eradication programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • AFSEEE. 1993. Frontlines: Feds fail to oust outdated agency from public lands.Inner Voice 5(1):4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, W., D.W. Uresk, and R. M. Hansen. 1986. Flora and fauna associated with prairie dog colonies and adjacent ungrazed mixed-grass prairie in western South Dakota.Journal of Range Management 39:135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. A., S. C. Forrest, T. W. Clark, and L. Richardson. 1986. Paleobiology, biogeography, and systematics of the black-footed ferret,Mustela nigripes (Audubon and Bachman), 1851.Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 8:11–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. R. 1921. Death to the rodents. US Department of Agriculture Yearbook 1920, pp. 421–438.

  • Cables, H. S. 1993. Acting Director, US NPS. Letter of 19 May, 1993 to David Roemer, Washington, DC.

  • Campbell, T. M., III. 1989. Prairie dog colony location surveys and black-footed ferret searches in Montana. Pages 1–6in The prairie dog ecosystem: Managing for biological diversity, Montana BLM Wildlife Tech. Bull. No. 2.

  • Campbell, T. M., III, and T. W. Clark. 1981. Colony characteristics and vertebrate associations of white-tailed and blacktailed prairie dogs in Wyoming.American Midland Naturalist 105:269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W. 1977. Ecology and ethology of the white-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys leucurus). Milwaukee Public Museum Publ. No. 3, 97 pp.

  • Clark, T. W., S. C. Forrest, L. Richardson, D. Casey, and T. M. Campbell III. 1986. A description and history of the Meeteetse black-footed ferret environment.Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 8:72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, W. H. 1993. Director, Operational Support Staff, APHIS ADC. Letter of 17 March, 1993 to David Roemer, Hyattsville, Maryland.

  • Connell, J. E. 1993. Area Manager, Phillips Resource Area BLM. Letter of 17 March, 1993 to David Holley.

  • Cully, J. F., Jr. 1991. Response of raptors to reduction of a Gunnison's prairie dog population by plague.American Midland Naturalist 125(1):140–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, T. R. 1988. Saving America's wildlife. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 222 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FaunaWest. 1993. Draft prairie dog management plans for the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation and Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation. Unpublished report.

  • Flath, D. L., and T. W. Clark. 1986. Historic status of black-footed ferret habitat in Montana.Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 8:63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garret, M. G., J. L. Hoogland, and W. L. Franklin. 1982. Demographic differences between an old and a new colony of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus).American Midland Naturalist 108:51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handegard, L. 1993. Director, Montana ADC Program. Personal communication with D. Roemer, 12 April, 1993.

  • Hanson, R. 1988. A chronology of prairie dog control operations and related developments in South Dakota. Pages 121–122in Eighth Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control workshop proceedings, 28–30 April, 1987. Rapid City, South Dakota. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-154.

  • Heiser, D. A. 1993. District Ranger, Douglas Ranger District. Letter of 31 March, 1993 to David Holley, Douglas, Wyoming.

  • Henderson, F. R., P. F. Springer, and R. Adrian. 1969. The black-footed ferret in South Dakota. South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks Tech. Bull. 4, pp 1–37.

  • Johnson, L. 1993. South Dakota Department of Agriculture, Division of Plant Industry. Personal communication with D. Calkin, 11 March, 1993.

  • Knowles, C. J. 1993. Personal communication with D. Roemer, 6 April 1993.

  • Knowles, C. J., and P. R. Knowles. 1994. A review of blacktailed prairie dog literature in relation to rangelands administered by the Custer National Forest. Unpublished report to Custer National Forest, 61 pp.

  • Knowles, C. J., C. J. Stoner, and S. D. Gieb. 1982. Selective use of black-tailed prairie dog towns by mountain plovers.Condor 84:71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, C. J., P. R. Knowles, and W. Haglan. 1994. An evaluation of 0.5% Permethrin dust for control of fleas in blacktailed prairie dog burrows on the UL Bend National Wildlife Refuge. Paper presented at the 1994 annual meeting of the Northwest Section of the Wildlife Society.

  • Krsnak, J. 1993. South Dakota Department of Agriculture, Division of Plant Industry. Letter of 15 April, 1993 to David Calkin.

  • Merriam, C. H. 1902. The prairie dog of the Great Plains. Pages 257–270in USDA Yearbook of Agriculture 910 pp.

  • Miller, A. L. 1988. An overview of the South Dakota Animal Damage Control Program. Pages 8–11in Eighth Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control workshop proceedings, 28–30 April, 1987, Rapid City, South Dakota. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-154.

  • Miller, A. L. 1993. South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks, Animal Damage Control supervisor. Letter of 9 March, 1993 to David Calkin.

  • Miller, B., C. Wemmer, D. Biggins, and R. Reading. 1990. A proposal to conserve black-footed ferrets and the prairie dog ecosystem.Environmental Management 14(6):763–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. M., G. Ceballos, and R. Reading. 1994. The prairie dog and biotic diversity.Conservation Biology 8:677–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • MT DSL (Montana Department of State Lands). 1991. Northeastern Land Office. Letter of 13 September, 1991 to DSL lessees. Lewistown, Montana.

  • Nelson, E. W. 1919. Annual report of Chief of Bureau of Biological Survey. Pages 275–298in USDA annual report for year ended June 1919.

  • Packhim, J. 1993. Director, Pocatello Supply Depot, APHIS ADC. Personal communication with D. Roemer, 16 March, 1993.

  • Reading R. P. 1993. Toward an endangered species reintroduction paradigm: A case study of the black-footed ferret. PhD thesis. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 558 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, R. 1993. Converse County Weed and Pest Control District Supervisor. Personal communication with D. Holley, 26 March, 1993.

  • Seton, E. T. 1929. Lives of game animals, Vol 4, Pt. 1. Doubleday, Doran Co., Garden City, New York, pp. 275–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharps, J. C. 1988. Politics, prairie dogs, and the sportsman. Pages 117–118in Eighth Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control workshop proceedings, 28–30 April, 1987. Rapid City, South Dakota. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-154.

  • Sharps, J. C., and D. W. Uresk. 1990. Ecological review of blacktailed prairie dogs and associated species in western South Dakota.Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 50:339–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society for Conservation Biology. 1994. Resolution of the Society for Conservation Biology: Conservation of prairie dog ecosystems. May 1994,Society for Conservation Biology Newsletter 1:7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschetter, B. J. 1988. Estimates of South Dakota prairie dog acreages, 1987. Report No. 88.01 (unpublished). Department of Game, Fish, and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uresk, D. W., and J. C. Sharps. 1986. Denning habitat and diet of swift fox in western South Dakota.Great Basin Naturalist 46:249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • US APHIS ADC (US Animal, Plant, and Health Inspection Service; Division of Animal Damage Control). 1988. Memo to state director concerning a prairie dog control project on BLM administered lands in Crook County, Wyoming, 6 pp.

  • US APHIS ADC (US Animal, Plant, and Health Inspection Service; Division of Animal Damage Control). 1990. Annual report, Hyattsville, Maryland.

  • US APHIS ADC (US Animal, Plant, and Health Inspection Service; Division of Animal Damage Control). 1991. Annual report, Hyattsville, Maryland.

  • US APHIS ADC (US Animal, Plant, and Health Inspection Service; Division of Animal Damage Control). 1994. Animal damage control program final environmental impact statement. Washington, DC.

  • US BIA (US Bureau of Indian Affairs). 1991. Prairie dog control program, Cheyenne River and Rosebud Indian reservations environmental assessment. Aberdeen, South Dakota.

  • US BIA (US Bureau of Indian Affairs). 1992a. Prairie management plan for the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation. Aberdeen, South Dakota, 32 pp.

  • US BIA (US Bureau of Indian Affairs). 1992b. Intent to prepare environmental impact statements (EIS) for the livestock grazing and prairie dog management programs for the Cheyenne River and Rosebud Sioux Indian reservations, South Dakota; notice. Federal Register 57 (223). 18 November, 1992.

  • US BLM (US Bureau of Land Management). 1983. State director guidance for resource management planning in Montana and the Dakotas. Billings, Montana.

  • US BLM (US Bureau of Land Management). 1986. Prairie dog ecosystem habitat management plan, Cody Resource Area, Worland District, Wyoming. 225 pp.

  • US BLM (US Bureau of Land Management). 1992a. Judith, Valley, Phillips resource management plan and final environmental impact statement. Lewistown, Montana, 436 pp.

  • US BLM (US Bureau of Land Management). 1992b. Pesticide use proposal 92-MT-020-0001. South Dakota Resource Area, Miles City District, Montana. 2 pp.

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1994. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 90-day finding on a petition to list the swift fox as endangered. 50 Federal Register 28328, 1 June, 1994.

  • US Forest Service (Medicine Bow National Forest). 1981. Thunder Basin prairie dog management environmental assessment. Douglas, Wyoming. 169 pp.

  • US Forest Service (Nebraska National Forest). 1989. Decision notice and finding of no significant impact. Chadron, Nebraska, 21 pp.

  • US Forest Service, 1991a. Animal damage management. Chapter 2650in Forest Service Manual. Washington, DC.

  • US Forest Service, 1991b. Memorandum of understanding between the Animal, Plant and Health Inspection Service and the Forest Service USDA. Chapter 1543.14in Forest Service Manual. Washington, DC.

  • US Forest Service (Nebraska National Forest). 1992. Annual ranger district prairie dog control project summaries, 1978–1992. Chadron, Nebraska.

  • US Forest Service (Custer National Forest). 1993. Ashland, Grand River, McKenzie and Medora Ranger District pesticide use proposals and planning documents, 1981–1993. Billings, Montana.

  • US GAO (US General Accounting Office). 1990. Rangeland management: BLM efforts to prevent unauthorized livestock grazing need strengthening. GAO/RCED-91-17. 16 pp.

  • US NPS (US National Park Service). 1988. Management policies. Natural resource management.

  • US NPS (US National Park Service). 1992. Pesticide use logs, case incident reports, and miscellaneous documents 1982–1992. FOIA request to D. Roemer, 1993.

  • Whicker, A. D. and J. K. Detling. 1993. Control of grassland ecosystem processes by prairie dogs. Pates 18–27in J. Oldemeyer and others (eds.) Management of prairie dog complexes for the reintroduction of the black-footed ferret. Biol. Rpt. 13. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. F., and H. M. Anderson, 1985. Land and Resource Planning in the National Forests.Oregon Law Review 64:170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. 1990. Wildlife Biologist, Forestry Division, Department of State Lands. Letter of 9 October, 1990 to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Studies, University of Montana, 59812, Missoula, Montana, USA

    David M. Roemer

  2. Biota Research and Consulting, Inc., Box 8578, 83001-8578, Jackson, Wyoming, USA

    Steven C. Forrest

Authors
  1. David M. Roemer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven C. Forrest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roemer, D.M., Forrest, S.C. Prairie dog poisoning in northern Great Plains: An analysis of programs and policies. Environmental Management 20, 349–359 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203843

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203843

Key words

Search

Navigation