Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Landscape-level ecological regions: Linking state-level ecoregion frameworks with stream habitat classifications

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regionalization is a form of spatial classification, where boundaries are drawn around areas that are relatively homogeneous in landscape characteristics. The process of delineating ecological regions, or ecoregions, includes the analysis of ecosystem structure. To date, ecoregions have been developed at national and state scales for research and resource management. Stream classification is another method to order the variability of aquatic habitats that spans spatial scales from microhabitat to valley segment. In this study, landscape-level ecoregions are developed for the upper Grande Ronde River basin in northeastern Oregon, 3000 sq km in area. The ecoregion framework presented here is proposed to bridge the gap between stream habitat and state-level ecoregion classifications. Classification at this scale is meant to address issues of management at local scales: to aid in sampling design, in extrapolation of the results of site-specific studies, and in the development of best management practices that are more predictive of ecosystem response than current methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alabama Department of Environmental Management. 1995. Alabama/Mississippi pilot reference site project: 1990–1994. Alabama Department of Environmental Management, Montgomery, Alabama, 37 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, H. J., and R. W. Cowlin. 1936. Forest type map of Oregon: Northeast quadrant. Pacific Northwest Forest Experiment Station, US Forest Service, Portland, Oregon. Scale 1:253,440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. 1983. Delineation of ecosystem regions.Environmental Management 7:365–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. 1984. Testing an ecosystem regionalization.Journal of Environmental Management 19:239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G., P. E. Avers, T. King, and W. H. McNab (eds.). 1994. Ecoregions and subregions of the United States. Map 1:7,500,000 scale and supplemental table of map unit descriptions. US Forest Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. T., B. N. Bjornstad, A. J. Busacca, K. R. Fecht, E. P. Kiver, U. L. Moody, J. G. Rigby, D. F. Stradling, and A. M. Tallman. 1991. Quaternary geology of the Columbia Plateau. Pages 215–250in R. B. Morrison (ed.), The geology of North America, vol K-2, Quaternary nonglacial geology: Conterminous United States. The Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, E. M. 1976. Geology of Oregon. Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa, 170 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrash, W., J. G. Bond, J. D. Kauffman, and R. Venkatakrishnan. 1980. Geology of the La Grande area, Oregon. Special Paper 6. State of Oregon, Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Portland, Oregon, 47 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brussock, P. B., A. V. Brown, and J. C. Dixon. 1985. Channel form and stream ecosystem models.Water Resources Bulletin 21 (5):859–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. E., and S. Bryce. 1996. Hierarchical subdivisions of the Columbia Plateau and Blue Mountain Ecoregions, Oregon and Washington. General technical report PNW-GTR-XXX. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, in review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. E., D. White, and A. L. Schaedel. 1991. Oregon, USA, ecological regions and subregions for water quality management.Environmental Management 15(6):847–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupp, C. E. 1988. Valley segment type classification for forested lands of Washington. Timber, Fish and Wildlife Ambient Monitoring Program Report. Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington, 47 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, R. E., P. Hessburg, M. Jensen, and B. Bormann. 1993. Eastside forest ecosystem health assessment, vol I. Executive summary. USDA Forest Service, Forest Sciences Laboratory, Wenatchee, Washington, 57 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F., and C. T. Dyrness. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, 452 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A. 1993. Topology of extinction and endangerment of native fishes in the Pacific Northwest and California (U.S.A.)Conservation Biology 7(2):342–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren, and M. D. Hurley. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context.Environmental Management 10:199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, A. L., T. R. Whittier, D. P. Larsen, J. M. Omernik, and R. M. Hughes. 1989. Regionalization as a tool for managing environmental resources. EPA/600/3–89/060. US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. V., F.J. Swanson, W. A. McKee, and K. W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones.Bioscience 41(8):540–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, G. E., J. M. Omernik, C. M. Rohm, and S. M. Pierson. 1994a. Florida regionalization project. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, G. E., J. M. Omernik, T. F. Wilton, and S. M. Pierson. 1994b. Ecoregions and subregions of Iowa: A framework for water quality assessment and management.Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 101(1):5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, F. C. 1973. Plant communities of the Blue Mountains of eastern Oregon and southeastern Washington. R6 area guide 3-1. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon, 62 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, E. R., and S. G. Brown. 1964. Geology and groundwater resources of the upper Grande Ronde River basin, Union County, Oregon. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1597. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, text and 3 maps, 102 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. 1996. Ecosystem controls on climate.Ecological Applications (in press).

  • Henjum, M. G., J. R. Karr, D. L. Bottom, D. A. Perry, J. C. Bednarz, S. G. Wright, S. A. Beckwitt, and E. Beckwitt. 1994. Interim protection for late-successional forests, fisheries, and watersheds: National forests east of the Cascade crest, Oregon and Washington. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 245 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., E. Rexstad, and C. E. Bond. 1987. The relationship of aquatic ecoregions, river basins, and physiographic provinces to the ichthyogeographic regions of Oregon.Copeia 1987:423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., T. R. Whittier, C. M. Rohm, and D. P. Larsen. 1990. A regional framework for establishing recovery criteria.Environmental Management 14(5):673–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., S. A. Heiskary, W. J. Matthews, and C. O. Yoder. 1994. Use of ecoregions in biological monitoring. Pages 125–151in S. L. Loeb and A. Spacie (eds.), Biological monitoring of aquatic systems. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. G., and R. R. Clausnitzer. 1992. Plant associations of the Blue and Ochoco Mountains. R6-ERW-TP-036-92. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Portland, Oregon, 164 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., and S. Caicco. 1992. Manual of Oregon actual vegetation. Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Idaho, Boise, Idaho, text and map supplement, 186 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajina, V. J. 1965. Biogeoclimatic zones and classification of British Columbia.Ecology of Western North Amerca 1:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchler, S. W. 1970. Potential natural vegetation map. Scale 1:7,500,000. Pages 89–91in The national atlas of the United States of America. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, D. P., J. M. Omernik, R. M. Hughes, C. M. Rohm, T. R. Whittier, A. J. Kinney, A. L. Gallant, and D. R. Dudley. 1986. Correspondence between spatial patterns in fish assemblages in Ohio streams and aquatic ecoregions.Environmental Management 10(6):815–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotspeich, F. B., and W. S. Platts. 1982. An integrated landaquatic classification system.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2:138–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. E. 1979. Gaia: A new look at life on Earth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, B. A., J. R. Sedell, J. E. Smith, R. C. Wissmar, S. E. Clarke, G. H. Reeves, and L. A. Brown. 1994. Management history of eastside ecosystems: Changes in fish habitat over 50 years, 1935–1992. General technical report PNW-GTR-321. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, 55 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W. 1988. Stream ecosystem theory: A global perspective.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7(4):263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. R., and J. M. Buffington. 1993. Channel classification, prediction of channel response, and assessment of channel condition. State of Washington Timber Fish and Wildlife Publication, TFW-SH10-93-002, Olympia, Washington, 84 pp.

  • Nehlsen, W., J. E. Williams, and J. A. Lichatowich. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: Stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington.Fisheries 16(2):4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77(1):118–125 text and map supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. 1995a. Ecoregions: A framework for managing ecosystems.The George Wright Forum 12(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. 1995b. Ecoregions: A spatial framework for environmental management. Pages 49–62in W. S. Davis and T. P. Simon (eds.), Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning and decision making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M., and G. E. Griffith. 1991. Ecological regions versus hydrologic units: Frameworks for managing water quality.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 46:334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S. 1974. Geomorphic and aquatic conditions influencing salmonids and stream classification—with application to ecosystem classification. US Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Boise, Idaho, 200 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S. 1980. A plea for fishery habitat classification.Fisheries 5:2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, W. G., and D. W. Wolf, 1994. Landscape and the intermontane northwest: An environmental history. General technical report PNW-GTR-319. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohm, C. M., J. W. Giese, and C. C. Bennett. 1987. Evaluation of an aquatic ecoregion classification of streams in Arkansas.Journal of Freshwater Ecology 4(1):127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers.Catena 22:169–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. S., and J. W. Sheard. 1981. Ecological land classification: A survey approach.Environmental Management 5(5):451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovlin, J. M. 1991. Fifty years of research progress: An historical document on the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range. General technical report PNW-GTR-266. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, 58 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, S. A., and J. M. Omernik. 1993. Subregions of the Columbia Plateau ecoregion. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, 19 pp and two map sheets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, S. A., C. Kiilsgaard, and J. M. Omernik. 1992. The subdivision of the Coast Range Ecoregion of Oregon and Washington. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, 39 pp and three map sheets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W., and M. G. Raphael (eds.). 1993. Forest ecosystem management: An ecological, economic and social assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team. US Forest Service, US Department of Commerce, US Department of the Interior, and the Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 977 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service). 1957. Plot procedure and forest type classification. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon, text and maps, 35 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service). 1985. Soil survey of Union County area, Oregon. USDA-SCS, La Grande, Oregon, 194 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency. 1991. Report of the Ecoregions Subcommittee of the Ecological Processes and Effects Committee: Evaluation of the ecoregions concept. EPA-SAB-EPEC-91-003, EPA, Science Advisory Board. Washington DC, 25 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. W. 1973. Reconnaissance geologic map of the Pendleton Quadrangle, Oregon and Washington. United States Geological Survey, Denver, Colarado. Scale 1:250,000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. W. 1979. Reconnaissance geologic map of the Grangeville Quadrangle, Baker, Union, Umatilla and Wallowa counties, Oregon. US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, Scale 1:250,000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. W., and N. S. MacLeod. 1991. Geologic map of Oregon. US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado. 1:500,000 scale, 2 sheets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. E. 1979. Toward classification and rationale for watershed management and stream protection. EPA-600/3-79-059, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, 143 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, W. A., and J. F. Arnold. 1972. Land systems inventory. US Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, Utah, 12 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • White Horse Associates. 1992. Classification and inventory of riverine/riparian habitat: Five Mile Creek Basin. US Forest Service, Umatilla National Forest, Pendleton, Oregon, 169 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittier, T. R., R. M. Hughes, and D. P. Larsen. 1988. Correspondence between ecoregions and spatial patterns in stream ecosystems in Oregon.Canadain Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45(7):1264–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiken, E. 1986. Terrestrial ecozones of Canada. Ecological land classification series No. 19. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 26 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., J. E. Johnson, D. A. Hendrickson, S. Contreras-Balderas, J. D. Williams, M. Navarro-Mendoza, D. E. McAllister, and J. E. Bacon. 1989. Fishes of North America endangered, threatened and of special concern.Fisheries 14(6):2–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dynamac International, Inc., US EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, 200 S.W. 35th St., 97333, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

    Sandra A. Bryce

  2. Department of Forest Science Forest Sciences Laboratory, Oregon State University, 97331, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

    Sharon E. Clarke

Authors
  1. Sandra A. Bryce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sharon E. Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bryce, S.A., Clarke, S.E. Landscape-level ecological regions: Linking state-level ecoregion frameworks with stream habitat classifications. Environmental Management 20, 297–311 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203839

Key words

Search

Navigation