Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term results of low vision rehabilitation in age-related macular degeneration

  • Letter to the editor
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One to five years after successful low vision rehabilitation, 199 patients with agerelated macular degeneration were asked by means of a questionnaire whether they still used their low vision aids and whether they were satisfied with the low vision counceling. We received feedback from 66% of the patients. 20 patients had already passed away. 74% of the 112 answering patients still use a low vision aid today. Three-quarters of them still use the originally prescribed low vision aid. Interestingly enough, the daily reading time was rather short, only 16% of the patients read more than 1 hour per day, 42% read somewhat more and 13% somewhat less than 10 minutes per day. Retrospectively, 81% of all responding patients found their low vision counceling at least a little, more of them quite or very helpful. These numbers suggest, that the initial labor of patiently examining and training older, visually handicapped patients is worthwhile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Schwartzenberg T, Merin S, Nawratzki I, Yanko L. Low-vision aids in Stargardt's disease. Ann Ophthalmol 1988; 20: 428–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Argon Laser Photocoagulation for Neovascular Maculopathy. Five-Year Results from Randomized Clinical Trials. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 1109–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Laser Photocoagulation of Subfoveal Neovascular Lesions in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 1220–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Subfoveal Neovascular Lesions in Age-Related Macular Degeneration - Guidelines for Evaluation and Treatment in the Macular Photocoagulation Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 1242–57.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yanuzzi LA, Slakter JS, Sorenson JA, Guyer DR, Orlock DA. Digital Indocyanine Green Videoangiography and Choroidal Neovascularization. Retina 1992; 12: 191–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bischoff P, Zogg M, Speiser P. Wem hilft eine Low-Vision-Beratung? Spektrum Augenheilkd 1990; 4: 151–53.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faye EE. Low vision aids.In: Duane TD (ed) Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 1, ch. 46. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1990: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fonda G. Eye pathology and low vision aids. Ann Ophthalmol 1984; 16: 438–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsson UL, Nilsson SE. Rehabilitation of the visually handicapped with advanced macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol 1986; 62: 345–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Rens GHMB, Chmielowski RJM, Lemmens WAJG. Results obtained with low vision aids. Doc Ophthalmol 1991; 78: 205–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bischoff P. Langzeitresultate der Low-Vision Beratung. Spektrum Augenheilkd 1994; in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bischoff, P. Long-term results of low vision rehabilitation in age-related macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol 89, 305–311 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203706

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203706

Key words

Navigation