Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction between the short-wavelength cone and rod systems in the electroretinogram of the cynomolgus monkey

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We recorded electroretinograms from anesthetized cynomolgus monkeys by means of three monochromatic (435, 524 or 579 nm) full-field stimuli presented with a monochromatic background light. The color of the background light was changed with 29 interference filters (400–700 nm). Waveforms were analyzed by means of principal component analysis to investigate interaction between the short-wavelength cone and other systems. With the same test lights, responses were also recorded during dark adaptation after 20,000-lux full bleach. The shape of the short-wavelength cone electroretinogram changed as a function of the wavelength of monochromatic background light. The change was clearer around 500-nm background light, to which the rod system is highly sensitive. Further, short-wavelength cone responses developed during the first 15 min in the dark; however, they became smaller with the recovery of the rod system. These findings suggest that there is interaction between the shortwavelength cone and rod systems. In addition, the results of waveform analysis confirmed the interaction between the long-wavelength and middle-wavelength cone systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PCA:

principal component analysis

References

  1. Kasuga T, Ozaki H. Three cone systems under white background in the electroretinogram of the cynomolgus monkey. Doc Ophthalmol 1994; 86: 335–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kasuga T, Ozaki H. Long wavelength-middle wavelength cone interaction under no background in the electroretinogram of the cynomolgus monkey. Doc Ophthalmol 1995; 90: 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donchin E, A multivariate approach to the analysis of average evoked potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1966; 13: 131–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donchin E, Heffley EF. Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review. In Otto D, ed. Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research. Washington, DC: S Government Printing Office, 1978: 555–72.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pugh EN Jr. Rhodopsin flash photolysis in man. J Physiol 1975; 248: 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowmaker JK, Dartnall HJA, Lythgoe JN, Mallon JD. The visual pigments of rods and cones in the rhesus monkey, Macaca mulatta. J Physiol 1978; 274: 329–48.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baylor DA. Photoreceptor signals and vision: Proctor lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sokol S, Riggs LA. Electrical and psychophysical responses of the human visual system to periodic variation of luminance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1971; 10: 171–80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg SH, Frumkes TE, Nygaard RW. Inhibitory influence of unstimulated rods in the human retina. Science 1983; 221: 180–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander KR, Fishman GA. Rod-cone interaction in flicker perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 1984; 68: 303–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frumkes TE, Lange G, Denny N, Beczkawska I. Influence of rod adaptation upon cone responses to light offset in humans, I: results in normal observers. Vis Neurosci 1992; 8: 83–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lange G, Frumkes TE. Influence of rod adaptation upon cone responses to light offset in humans, II: results in an observer with exaggerated suppressive rod-cone interaction. Vis Neurosci 1992; 8: 91–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arden GB, Frumkes TE. Stimulation of rods can increase cone flicker ERGs in man. Vision Res 1986; 26: 711–21.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mariani AP. Bipolar cells in monkey retina selective for the cones likely to be bluesensitive. Nature 1984; 308: 184–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kouyama N, Marshak DW. Bipolar cells specific for blue cones in the macaque retina. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 1233–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wässle H, Grünert U, Martin PR, Boycott BB. Immunocytochemical characterization and spatial distribution of midget bipolar cells in the macaque monkey retina. Vision Res 1994; 34: 561–79.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sawusch M, Pokorny J, Smith VC. Clinical electroretinography for short wavelength sensitive cones. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 966–74.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yagasaki K, Miyake Y. Clinical application of the responses of blue cone system studied with electroretinogram (ERG): analysis of recording conditions and responses in normal subjects. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn 1983; 87: 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kalloniatis M, Harwerth RS. Spectral sensitivity and adaptation characteristics of cone mechanisms under white-light adaptation. J Opt Soc Am A 1990; 7: 1912–28.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kolb H, Zhang L, Dekorver L. Differential staining of neurons in the human retina with antibodies to protein kinase C isozymes. Vis Neurosci 1993; 10: 341–51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frumkes TE, Wu SM. Independent influences of rod adaptation on cone-mediated responses to light onset and offset in distal retinal neurons. J Neurophysiol 1990; 64: 1043–54.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ingling CR Jr, Drum BA. Why the blue arcs of the retina are blue. Vision Res 1977; 17: 498–500.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ingling CR Jr. The spectral sensitivity of the opponent-color channels. Vision Res 1977; 17: 1083–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kasuga, T., Ozaki, H. Interaction between the short-wavelength cone and rod systems in the electroretinogram of the cynomolgus monkey. Doc Ophthalmol 91, 117–127 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203691

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203691

Key words

Navigation