Skip to main content
Log in

Activity of cathepsin D as affected by chemical and physical dry-curing parameters

Der Einfluß von chemischen und physikalischen Parametern bei der Trockenpökelung auf die Aktivität von Kathepsin D

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Wirkung von Pökelhilfsstoffen (Nitrat, Glucose, Ascorbinsäure und Chlorid) und physikalischen Parametern (Temperatur, Wasseraktivität und Druck) auf Kathepsin D aus Schweinemuskeln wurde untersucht. Chlorid zeigte einen starken Hemmeffekt. Nitrat und hohe Konzentrationen von Ascorbinsäure (von 4 bis 8 g/L) hemmen Kathepsin D in geringem Maße. Die Zugabe von Glucose (bis 4 g/L) erhöhte hingegen dessen Aktivität. Die Kathepsin-d-Aktivität war am höchsten bei Incubationstemperaturen von 33 bis 53 °C; sie wurde beeinflußt durch eine Abnahme der Wasseraktivität und war unbeeinflußt durch Druck.

Summary

The effect of curing agents (nitrate, glucose, ascorbic acid and chloride) and physical parameters (temperature, water activity and pressure) on porcine muscle cathepsin D has been studied. Chloride (in the assayed range 0 to 75 g Cl-/L) showed a strong inhibitory effect. Nitrate (in the assayed range 0 to 800 mg/L) and high concentrations of ascorbic acid (4 to 8 g/L) slightly inhibited cathepsin D. However, its activity increased when glucose was added up to 4 g/L. Cathepsin D activity was maximal when incubated at 33 to 53° C, was affected by a decrease in water activity and unaffected by pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Goll DE, Otsuka Y, Nagainis PA, Shannon JD, Shridhar KS, Muguruma M (1983) J Food Biochem 7:137–177

    Google Scholar 

  2. Etherington DJ (1984) J Animal Sei 59:1644–1650

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zeece GM, Katoh K, Robson EM, Frederick CP (1986) J Food Sci 51:769–773

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asghar A, Bhatti AR (1987) Advances in food research, vol 31. In: Chichester CO, Mrak, EM, Schweigert BS (ed) Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp 343–451

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellati M, Dazzi G, Chizzolini R, Palmia F, Parolari G (1983) Ind Conserve 58:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flores J, Bermell S, Nieto P (1985) Rev Agroquim Tecnol Aliment 25(3):400–408

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCain CR, Blumer TN, Craig HB, Steel RG (1968) J Food Sci 33:142–145

    Google Scholar 

  8. Toldr'a F, Etherington DJ (1988) Meat Sci 23:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deng JC, Lillard DA (1973) J Food Sci 38:299–302

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sarraga C, Gil M, Arnau J, Monfort JM, Cusso R (1989) Meat Sci 25:241–249

    Google Scholar 

  11. Okitani A, Matsumoto T, Kitamura Y, Kato H (1981) Biochim Biophys Acta 662:202–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Etherington DJ, Wardale RJ (1982) J Cell Sci 58:139–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anson ML (1938) J Gen Physiol 22:79–89

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knight CG, Barret AJ (1976) Biochem J 155:117–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mednis A, Renold HG (1972) Anal Biochem 49:134–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leistner (1983) Fleischwirtschaft Español 1:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dalla Rosa M, Nicoli MC, Marino V (1987) Ind Aliment 22:879–885

    Google Scholar 

  18. Belitz HD, Grosch W (eds) (1986) Food chemistry. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 452

    Google Scholar 

  19. Flores J (1989) Viand Prod Carnes 10:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki A, Fujimaki M (1968) Agric Biol Chem 32:975–982

    Google Scholar 

  21. Acker LW (1969) Food Technol 23:1257–1270

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rico, E., Toldrá, F. & Flores, J. Activity of cathepsin D as affected by chemical and physical dry-curing parameters. Z Lebensm Unters Forch 191, 20–23 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202359

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202359

Keywords

Navigation