Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perspectives of non-phytoseiid predators for the biological control of plant pests

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-phytoseiid mites of potential importance in the biocontrol of plant pests include a dozen families. The host plant constitutes the universe in which pests and predators interact; thus plant growth pattern, leaf structure and various available nutrients may affect the control potential of the mites. The role of infochemicals in prey finding by non-phytoseiids probably differs among the various families. Prey size may be important in control success when predaceous mites feed on insect pests. Interactions between phytoseiids and members of other families may hinder or complement pest control. Little is known of the effects of plant-protection chemicals on non-phytoseiid predators, but they appear to be quite variable. Current research onHemisarcoptes, a parasite of armored scale insects, is reviewed, including a successful introduction into New Zealand. Active mite slicing into host shields and deutonymph interactions with its vector-beetle are important aspects of the predator's effectiveness. Further research should include: collecting (with emphasis on the tropics and subtropics), describing and testing additional mite species against more pests; assaying pesticide effects; studying interactions between predators of different families, especially on uncultivated plants; and trying more predaceous mites against nematodes, plant diseases and weeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, R.E., 1973. Biology of the predaceous mite,Pergamasus quisquiliarum, on the garden symphylan,Scutigerella immaculata, in the laboratory. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 66:1354–1356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brust, G.E. and House, G.J., 1988. A study ofTyrophagus putrescentiae (Acari: Acaridae) as a facultative predator of southern corn rootworm eggs. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 4:335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, H.C., 1970. Effects of manure applications and mite predation on corn rootworm populations in Minnesota. J. Econ. Entomol., 63:934–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D.R. and Harmsen, R., 1990. Predatory behavior and prey-stage preferences of stigmaeid and phytoseiid mites and their potential compatibility in biological control. Can. Entomol., 122:321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D.R. and Harmsen, R., 1992. Stigmaeid-phytoseiid interactions and the impact of natural enemy complexes on plant-inhabiting mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 14:327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A., 1990. Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides. J. Wiley, New York, NY, 723 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curl, E.A., 1988. The role of soil microfauna in plant-disease suppression. CRC Critical Rev. Plant. Sci., 175–196.

  • De Leon, D., 1967. Some Mites of the Caribbean Area. Allen Press, Kansas, 68 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Moraes, G.J. and McMurtry, J.A., 1987. Physiological effects of the host plant on the suitability ofTetranychus urticae as prey forPhytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga, 32:35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Moraes, G.J., Neto, R.S. and Pinto, H.C.S., 1989. Morphology biology and pesticide tolerance ofCheletogenes ornatus (Acari: Cheyletidae). Entomophaga, 34:477–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, M. and Sabelis, M.W., 1988. How plants obtain predatory mites as body guards. Neth. J. Zool., 38:148–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, M., Sabelis, M.W., Takabayashi, J., Bruin, J. and Posthumus, M.A., 1990. Plant strategies of manipulating predatory-prey interactions through allelochemicals: prospects for application in pest control. J. Chem. Ecol., 16:3091–3118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, U., 1991. Arthropod root pests. In: Y. Waisal, A. Eshel and U. Kafkafi (Editors), Plant Roots, the Hidden Half, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp. 807–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, U. and Smiley, R.L., 1990. Acarine Biocontrol Agents, An Illustrated Key and Manual. Chapman and Hall, London, 174 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, U., OConnor, B.M. and Houck, M.A., 1990. Acari. In: D. Rosen (Editor), Armored Scale Insects, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagley, E.A.C. and Biggs, A.R., 1989. Effects of three fungicides on populations of a phytophagous and several predacious mites (Acarina) on apple. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 6:253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S.A. (and 21 co-authors), 1991. Results of the fifth joint pesticide programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group “Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms”. Entomophaga, 36:55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck, M.A. and OConnor, B.M., 1990. Ontogeny and life history ofHemisarcoptes cooremani (Acari: Hemisarcoptidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 83:869–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck, M.A. and OConnor, B.M., 1991. Ecological and evolutionary significance of phoresy in the Astigmata. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 36:611–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbutt, H.W., 1963. The genusAsca Heyden (Acarina: Mesostigmata) in North America, Hawaii and Europe. Acarologia, 5:480–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karg, W., 1987. Zur Kenntnis der Raubmilbenarten der GattungGamasiphis Berlese, 1904 (Acarina, Parasitiformes). Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 62:301–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keesing, V.F., 1990. The toxicity of four insecticides to the miteHemisarcoptes coccophagus and its host scaleHemiberlesia lataniae. Proc. 43rd N.Z. Weed Pest Cont. Conf. New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Society, pp. 247–251.

  • Lange, A.B., Drozdovskii, E.M. and Gushkovskaya, L.M., 1974. The anystis mite—an effective predator of small phytophages. Zashch. Rast. Moscow, 1974:26–28 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, P.K.C., 1986. Present status of biological control of mite pests in Taiwan. Plant Prot. Bull. (Taiwan), 28:31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muma, M.H., 1975. Mites associated with citrus in Florida. Univ. Florida Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull., 640A, 92 pp.

  • O'Dowd, D.J. and Willson, M.F., 1991. Associations between mites and leaf domatia. TREE, 6:179–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, R.W. and Turner, C.E., 1989. Occurrence of predatory and fungivorous mites in leaf domatia. Am. J. Bot., 76:105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack, G. and Rilling, G., 1978. Über das Vorkommen der Modermilbe,Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) in Blattgallen der Reblaus,Dactylosphaera vitifolii Shimer. Vitis, 17:54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M.A., 1991. Searching behavior and associational response ofZetzellia mali (Acarina: Stigmaeidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 11:81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schicha, E., 1987. Phytoseiidae of Australia and Neighboring Areas. Indira Publishing House, Oak Park, MI, 187 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, R.F.W., 1982. Effect of infestation withCoccipolipus epilachnae Smiley (Acarina: Podapolipidae) on fecundity and longevity of the Mexican bean beetle. Int. J. Acarol., 8:81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, J.T., Kinn, D.N. and Doutt, R.L., 1983. Biological observations onBdella longicornis: a predatory mite in California vinyards (Acari: Bdellidae). Entomography, 2:297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiling, P., 1990. Calculating the establishment rates of parasitoids in classical biological control. Am. Entomol., 36:225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, W.A. and Heathcote, G.D., 1987. Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) populations and the incidence of virus yellows on insecticide-free sugarbeet in south-eastern England in 1978–1981. Bull Entomol. Res., 77:617–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M.M.H., 1974. An attempt to extend the biological control ofSminthurus viridis (Collembola) to new areas in Australia by introducing a predatory mite,Neomolgus capillatus (Bdellidae). Aust. J. Zool., 22:519–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, D.E. and Kaplan, D.T., 1990. A guild of thelytokous mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) associated with citrus roots in Florida. Environ. Entomol., 19:1338–1343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witz, B.W., 1990. Antipredator mechanisms in arthropods: a twenty year literature survey. Fla. Entomol., 73:71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z.-Q., 1991. Parasitism ofAcyrthosiphon pisum byAllothrombium pulvinum (Acariformes: Thrombidiidae): host attachment site, host site selection, superparasitism and effect on host. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 11:137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z.-Q. and Xin, J.-L., 1989. Biology ofAllothrombium pulvinum (Acariformes: Trombidiidae), a potential biological control agent of aphids in China. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 6:101–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 76-100, Rehovot, Israel

    Uri Gerson

Authors
  1. Uri Gerson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerson, U. Perspectives of non-phytoseiid predators for the biological control of plant pests. Exp Appl Acarol 14, 383–391 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200575

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200575

Keywords

Search

Navigation